16世纪和17世纪中国画的画布、颜料和图案结构的比较效果

IF 1.5 3区 地球科学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY
Archaeometry Pub Date : 2025-04-02 DOI:10.1111/arcm.13079
Lingyu Zhao
{"title":"16世纪和17世纪中国画的画布、颜料和图案结构的比较效果","authors":"Lingyu Zhao","doi":"10.1111/arcm.13079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of <i>compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color</i>, <i>proficiency in painting techniques</i>, <i>color, and harmonic solution</i>) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"67 5","pages":"1230-1246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of techniques for examining the canvas, paint, and the pictorial structure of 16th- and 17th-century Chinese paintings\",\"authors\":\"Lingyu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/arcm.13079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of <i>compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color</i>, <i>proficiency in painting techniques</i>, <i>color, and harmonic solution</i>) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"1230-1246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文主要考察和比较了分析一幅画的颜料、画布和图案结构的技术的有效性,以确定其状况、年代和真实性。这项研究分四个阶段进行。在第一阶段,研究采用立体显微镜、UV-Vis-NIR反射光谱、x射线成像、x射线荧光和生化分析来检查画作样本。在第二阶段,对真迹和复制品的分析结果进行比较,以了解有助于确定作品真实性的独特特征。在第三阶段,对分配给这些绘画的测试结果和分数(就构图安排、使用颜色描绘形状、熟练掌握绘画技巧、颜色和调和解决方案而言)进行比较。第四阶段包括对专家进行调查,以获得他们对检查画布、颜料和图像结构的特殊程序和技术的意见。研究结果揭示了专家和绘画研究领域的首选分析方法,这些方法被证明是最有效的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative effectiveness of techniques for examining the canvas, paint, and the pictorial structure of 16th- and 17th-century Chinese paintings

The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color, proficiency in painting techniques, color, and harmonic solution) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archaeometry
Archaeometry 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
105
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance. The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信