{"title":"16世纪和17世纪中国画的画布、颜料和图案结构的比较效果","authors":"Lingyu Zhao","doi":"10.1111/arcm.13079","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of <i>compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color</i>, <i>proficiency in painting techniques</i>, <i>color, and harmonic solution</i>) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.</p>","PeriodicalId":8254,"journal":{"name":"Archaeometry","volume":"67 5","pages":"1230-1246"},"PeriodicalIF":1.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative effectiveness of techniques for examining the canvas, paint, and the pictorial structure of 16th- and 17th-century Chinese paintings\",\"authors\":\"Lingyu Zhao\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/arcm.13079\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of <i>compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color</i>, <i>proficiency in painting techniques</i>, <i>color, and harmonic solution</i>) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeometry\",\"volume\":\"67 5\",\"pages\":\"1230-1246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeometry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13079\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHAEOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeometry","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/arcm.13079","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Comparative effectiveness of techniques for examining the canvas, paint, and the pictorial structure of 16th- and 17th-century Chinese paintings
The paper primarily examines and compares the effectiveness of techniques for analyzing the paint, canvas, and pictorial structure of a painting to determine its condition, age, and authenticity. The study was conducted in four phases. In the first phase, the study employed a stereo microscope, UV–Vis–NIR reflectance spectroscopy, X-ray imaging, X-ray fluorescence, and biochemical analysis in order to examine a sample of paintings. During the second phase, the results of analyzing authentic paintings and reproductions were compared to understand the distinctive features that aid in determining a piece's authenticity. During the third phase, the test findings and scores (in terms of compositional arrangement, the depiction of shapes using color, proficiency in painting techniques, color, and harmonic solution) assigned to these paintings were compared. The fourth phase included a survey conducted among experts to obtain their opinions on special programs and technologies for examining the canvas, paints, and pictorial structure. Research findings revealed the analysis methods preferred by experts and the domains of painting research in which these methods prove to be most effective.
期刊介绍:
Archaeometry is an international research journal covering the application of the physical and biological sciences to archaeology, anthropology and art history. Topics covered include dating methods, artifact studies, mathematical methods, remote sensing techniques, conservation science, environmental reconstruction, biological anthropology and archaeological theory. Papers are expected to have a clear archaeological, anthropological or art historical context, be of the highest scientific standards, and to present data of international relevance.
The journal is published on behalf of the Research Laboratory for Archaeology and the History of Art, Oxford University, in association with Gesellschaft für Naturwissenschaftliche Archäologie, ARCHAEOMETRIE, the Society for Archaeological Sciences (SAS), and Associazione Italian di Archeometria.