欲望的欲望:黑格尔理性的本构模式(第四章)

IF 0.9 2区 哲学 0 PHILOSOPHY
Jensen Suther
{"title":"欲望的欲望:黑格尔理性的本构模式(第四章)","authors":"Jensen Suther","doi":"10.1111/ejop.13053","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>A longstanding interpretive issue concerning Chapter IV of the <i>Phenomenology of Spirit</i> is how to understand the singularly difficult discussion of the role of life in the development of self-consciousness. Some readers hold that self-consciousness consists in the recognition of one's independence from the demands of life, while others have argued that self-consciousness is both life and <i>more than</i> life at once. This paper rejects these readings and contributes to the ongoing discussion surrounding “additive” versus “transformative” models of rationality by arguing that Hegel develops a third way in Chapter IV, what I call the <i>constitutive</i> model of rationality (CMR). I argue that the master–slave dialectic in Chapter IV vindicates the CMR by attempting to deny it. On my reading, Hegel shows that organic desire in creatures like us cannot be satisfied <i>as such</i> in the absence of the reciprocal recognition of the <i>rationality</i> of desire.</p>","PeriodicalId":46958,"journal":{"name":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","volume":"33 3","pages":"989-1006"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Desire for Desire: Hegel's Constitutive Model of Rationality in Chapter IV\",\"authors\":\"Jensen Suther\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ejop.13053\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>A longstanding interpretive issue concerning Chapter IV of the <i>Phenomenology of Spirit</i> is how to understand the singularly difficult discussion of the role of life in the development of self-consciousness. Some readers hold that self-consciousness consists in the recognition of one's independence from the demands of life, while others have argued that self-consciousness is both life and <i>more than</i> life at once. This paper rejects these readings and contributes to the ongoing discussion surrounding “additive” versus “transformative” models of rationality by arguing that Hegel develops a third way in Chapter IV, what I call the <i>constitutive</i> model of rationality (CMR). I argue that the master–slave dialectic in Chapter IV vindicates the CMR by attempting to deny it. On my reading, Hegel shows that organic desire in creatures like us cannot be satisfied <i>as such</i> in the absence of the reciprocal recognition of the <i>rationality</i> of desire.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46958,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"volume\":\"33 3\",\"pages\":\"989-1006\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.13053\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"PHILOSOPHY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF PHILOSOPHY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ejop.13053","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"PHILOSOPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

关于《精神现象学》第四章,一个长期存在的解释性问题是,如何理解生命在自我意识发展中的作用这一异常困难的讨论。一些读者认为,自我意识包括承认一个人独立于生活的需要,而另一些人则认为,自我意识既是生活,又不仅仅是生活。本文拒绝这些解读,并通过论证黑格尔在第四章中发展了第三种方式,我称之为理性的本构模型(CMR),为围绕理性的“加法”与“变革”模型的持续讨论做出了贡献。我认为,第四章中的主从辩证法通过试图否定CMR来证明它是正确的。在我的阅读中,黑格尔表明,像我们这样的生物的有机欲望,在缺乏对欲望合理性的相互承认的情况下,是无法得到满足的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Desire for Desire: Hegel's Constitutive Model of Rationality in Chapter IV

A longstanding interpretive issue concerning Chapter IV of the Phenomenology of Spirit is how to understand the singularly difficult discussion of the role of life in the development of self-consciousness. Some readers hold that self-consciousness consists in the recognition of one's independence from the demands of life, while others have argued that self-consciousness is both life and more than life at once. This paper rejects these readings and contributes to the ongoing discussion surrounding “additive” versus “transformative” models of rationality by arguing that Hegel develops a third way in Chapter IV, what I call the constitutive model of rationality (CMR). I argue that the master–slave dialectic in Chapter IV vindicates the CMR by attempting to deny it. On my reading, Hegel shows that organic desire in creatures like us cannot be satisfied as such in the absence of the reciprocal recognition of the rationality of desire.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
11.10%
发文量
82
期刊介绍: ''Founded by Mark Sacks in 1993, the European Journal of Philosophy has come to occupy a distinctive and highly valued place amongst the philosophical journals. The aim of EJP has been to bring together the best work from those working within the "analytic" and "continental" traditions, and to encourage connections between them, without diluting their respective priorities and concerns. This has enabled EJP to publish a wide range of material of the highest standard from philosophers across the world, reflecting the best thinking from a variety of philosophical perspectives, in a way that is accessible to all of them.''
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信