{"title":"重新审视中国保护区在碳储存中的作用","authors":"Shuhan Wang, Jian Peng, Yifan Lin, Tao Hu","doi":"10.1029/2025EF006202","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>It is widely expected that conservation efforts within protected areas (PAs) can achieve multiple conservation objectives simultaneously. PAs established primarily for biodiversity conservation also contribute to increasing carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. However, there is a lack of quantitative studies on the role of China's existing PAs in carbon storage. We proposed an integrated approach to estimating the carbon density of terrestrial ecosystems in China, based on a modified Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model. Through a statistical matching method, we evaluated the conservation effectiveness of PAs in carbon storage during 2020–2050. Under the moderate emission scenario (SSP2-RCP4.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to 168.3 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, an increase of 14.2% compared to 2020. In contrast, under the low emission scenario (SSP1-RCP2.6) and high emission scenario (SSP5-RCP8.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to decrease by 4.8% and 4.6%, respectively. By 2050, approximately 45%–47% of PAs are expected to experience effective conservation in carbon storage, with about 80% of PAs maintaining their current effectiveness during 2020–2050. Additionally, in view of area proportion, 34.3%–36.2% of PAs will remain effective, while 1.8%–4.0% are projected to transition from ineffective to effective. PAs with conservation effectiveness in carbon storage were predominantly located in humid and mid-to-high-altitude regions. Given the spatial mismatch among existing PAs, priority areas for carbon storage conservation, and effective areas for carbon storage conservation, our findings underscore the necessity of expanding China's PAs to achieve the additional benefits of PAs in carbon storage conservation.</p>","PeriodicalId":48748,"journal":{"name":"Earths Future","volume":"13 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006202","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Revisiting the Role of China's Protected Areas in Carbon Storage\",\"authors\":\"Shuhan Wang, Jian Peng, Yifan Lin, Tao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1029/2025EF006202\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>It is widely expected that conservation efforts within protected areas (PAs) can achieve multiple conservation objectives simultaneously. PAs established primarily for biodiversity conservation also contribute to increasing carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. However, there is a lack of quantitative studies on the role of China's existing PAs in carbon storage. We proposed an integrated approach to estimating the carbon density of terrestrial ecosystems in China, based on a modified Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model. Through a statistical matching method, we evaluated the conservation effectiveness of PAs in carbon storage during 2020–2050. Under the moderate emission scenario (SSP2-RCP4.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to 168.3 Mg C ha<sup>−1</sup>, an increase of 14.2% compared to 2020. In contrast, under the low emission scenario (SSP1-RCP2.6) and high emission scenario (SSP5-RCP8.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to decrease by 4.8% and 4.6%, respectively. By 2050, approximately 45%–47% of PAs are expected to experience effective conservation in carbon storage, with about 80% of PAs maintaining their current effectiveness during 2020–2050. Additionally, in view of area proportion, 34.3%–36.2% of PAs will remain effective, while 1.8%–4.0% are projected to transition from ineffective to effective. PAs with conservation effectiveness in carbon storage were predominantly located in humid and mid-to-high-altitude regions. Given the spatial mismatch among existing PAs, priority areas for carbon storage conservation, and effective areas for carbon storage conservation, our findings underscore the necessity of expanding China's PAs to achieve the additional benefits of PAs in carbon storage conservation.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48748,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Earths Future\",\"volume\":\"13 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1029/2025EF006202\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Earths Future\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006202\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Earths Future","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1029/2025EF006202","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
人们普遍期望保护区内的保护工作可以同时实现多个保护目标。主要为保护生物多样性而建立的保护区也有助于增加陆地生态系统的碳储量。然而,对于中国现有保护区在碳储存中的作用,目前还缺乏定量研究。基于改进的生态系统服务与权衡综合评估模型,提出了一种估算中国陆地生态系统碳密度的综合方法。通过统计匹配方法,对2020-2050年森林保护区的碳储量保护效果进行了评价。在中等排放情景下(SSP2-RCP4.5),预估PAs的平均碳密度为168.3 Mg C ha−1,比2020年增加14.2%。低排放情景(SSP1-RCP2.6)和高排放情景(SSP5-RCP8.5)下,pa的平均碳密度分别下降4.8%和4.6%。到2050年,预计约45%-47%的保护区将实现有效的碳储存保护,约80%的保护区将在2020-2050年期间保持目前的有效性。此外,考虑到面积比例,34.3%-36.2%的保护区将保持有效,1.8%-4.0%的保护区将由无效向有效过渡。具有碳储量保护作用的保护区主要分布在湿润和中高海拔地区。鉴于现有保护区、碳储存优先区和有效区在空间上的不匹配,我们的研究结果强调了扩大中国保护区的必要性,以实现保护区在碳储存方面的额外效益。
Revisiting the Role of China's Protected Areas in Carbon Storage
It is widely expected that conservation efforts within protected areas (PAs) can achieve multiple conservation objectives simultaneously. PAs established primarily for biodiversity conservation also contribute to increasing carbon storage in terrestrial ecosystems. However, there is a lack of quantitative studies on the role of China's existing PAs in carbon storage. We proposed an integrated approach to estimating the carbon density of terrestrial ecosystems in China, based on a modified Integrated Valuation of Ecosystem Services and Trade-offs model. Through a statistical matching method, we evaluated the conservation effectiveness of PAs in carbon storage during 2020–2050. Under the moderate emission scenario (SSP2-RCP4.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to 168.3 Mg C ha−1, an increase of 14.2% compared to 2020. In contrast, under the low emission scenario (SSP1-RCP2.6) and high emission scenario (SSP5-RCP8.5), the average carbon density of PAs is projected to decrease by 4.8% and 4.6%, respectively. By 2050, approximately 45%–47% of PAs are expected to experience effective conservation in carbon storage, with about 80% of PAs maintaining their current effectiveness during 2020–2050. Additionally, in view of area proportion, 34.3%–36.2% of PAs will remain effective, while 1.8%–4.0% are projected to transition from ineffective to effective. PAs with conservation effectiveness in carbon storage were predominantly located in humid and mid-to-high-altitude regions. Given the spatial mismatch among existing PAs, priority areas for carbon storage conservation, and effective areas for carbon storage conservation, our findings underscore the necessity of expanding China's PAs to achieve the additional benefits of PAs in carbon storage conservation.
期刊介绍:
Earth’s Future: A transdisciplinary open access journal, Earth’s Future focuses on the state of the Earth and the prediction of the planet’s future. By publishing peer-reviewed articles as well as editorials, essays, reviews, and commentaries, this journal will be the preeminent scholarly resource on the Anthropocene. It will also help assess the risks and opportunities associated with environmental changes and challenges.