利用变壁角锥台评估的直槽试验优化增量薄板成形性能

IF 2 Q3 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING
Ravi Prakash Singh , Santosh Kumar , Edward James Brambley , Sudarshan Choudhary , Pankaj Kumar Singh , Sisir Dhara
{"title":"利用变壁角锥台评估的直槽试验优化增量薄板成形性能","authors":"Ravi Prakash Singh ,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar ,&nbsp;Edward James Brambley ,&nbsp;Sudarshan Choudhary ,&nbsp;Pankaj Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Sisir Dhara","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (<span><math><mrow><mn>84.65</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>mm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></math></span>), tool diameter (<span><math><mrow><mn>12.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) and step depth (<span><math><mrow><mn>0.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>60</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 453-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing formability of incremental sheet forming using the straight groove test assessed with a variable wall angle conical frustum\",\"authors\":\"Ravi Prakash Singh ,&nbsp;Santosh Kumar ,&nbsp;Edward James Brambley ,&nbsp;Sudarshan Choudhary ,&nbsp;Pankaj Kumar Singh ,&nbsp;Sisir Dhara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (<span><math><mrow><mn>84.65</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>mm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></math></span>), tool diameter (<span><math><mrow><mn>12.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) and step depth (<span><math><mrow><mn>0.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>60</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 453-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325000860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目前的研究重点是AA 6061合金的机器人辅助增量板成形(RAISF)。提出了一种简单的优化成形参数的方法,以最大限度地提高冲压成形性能;成形参数是刀具速度、步进深度和刀具直径。采用实验设计(DOE)方法对直槽试验进行了优化。根据中心复合响应面设计(CCRSD)方法选取39个样品进行直槽试验。通过考虑槽深、回弹和成形时间来评估成形性;刀具速度(84.65 mm/s)、刀具直径(12.5mm)和台阶深度(0.4mm)的组合最优。然后制作了变壁角锥锥台(VWACF),以评估优化参数对极限锥壁角的影响。最后,制作了一个等壁角60°的锥形锥台,并将其成形极限与AA 6061的常规成形极限进行了中岛试验比较。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Optimizing formability of incremental sheet forming using the straight groove test assessed with a variable wall angle conical frustum
The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (84.65,mm/s), tool diameter (12.5mm) and step depth (0.4mm) were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle 60 was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Manufacturing Letters
Manufacturing Letters Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
4.20
自引率
5.10%
发文量
192
审稿时长
60 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信