Ravi Prakash Singh , Santosh Kumar , Edward James Brambley , Sudarshan Choudhary , Pankaj Kumar Singh , Sisir Dhara
{"title":"利用变壁角锥台评估的直槽试验优化增量薄板成形性能","authors":"Ravi Prakash Singh , Santosh Kumar , Edward James Brambley , Sudarshan Choudhary , Pankaj Kumar Singh , Sisir Dhara","doi":"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.054","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (<span><math><mrow><mn>84.65</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>mm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></math></span>), tool diameter (<span><math><mrow><mn>12.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) and step depth (<span><math><mrow><mn>0.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>60</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":38186,"journal":{"name":"Manufacturing Letters","volume":"44 ","pages":"Pages 453-465"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimizing formability of incremental sheet forming using the straight groove test assessed with a variable wall angle conical frustum\",\"authors\":\"Ravi Prakash Singh , Santosh Kumar , Edward James Brambley , Sudarshan Choudhary , Pankaj Kumar Singh , Sisir Dhara\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.mfglet.2025.06.054\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (<span><math><mrow><mn>84.65</mn><mo>,</mo><mi>mm</mi><mo>/</mo><mi>s</mi></mrow></math></span>), tool diameter (<span><math><mrow><mn>12.5</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) and step depth (<span><math><mrow><mn>0.4</mn><mspace></mspace><mi>mm</mi></mrow></math></span>) were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle <span><math><mrow><msup><mrow><mn>60</mn></mrow><mrow><mo>∘</mo></mrow></msup></mrow></math></span> was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":38186,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"volume\":\"44 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 453-465\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Manufacturing Letters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325000860\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Manufacturing Letters","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2213846325000860","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimizing formability of incremental sheet forming using the straight groove test assessed with a variable wall angle conical frustum
The current study is focused on Robot Assisted Incremental Sheet Forming (RAISF) of AA 6061 alloys. A simple and streamlined approach is presented to optimize the forming parameters to maximize formability during RAISF; the forming parameters are the tool speed, the step depth, and the tool diameter. The optimized parameters are found using a Design of Experiments (DOE) methodology applied to a straight groove test. Straight groove tests were conducted on 39 samples chosen according to a Central Composite Response Surface Design (CCRSD) methodology. Formability is assessed by considering the groove depth, spring back, and forming time; the combination of tool speed (), tool diameter () and step depth () were found optimal. A Variable Wall Angle Conical Frustum (VWACF) was then fabricated to assess the effect of the optimized parameters on the limiting conical wall angle. Finally, a conical frustum of constant wall angle was fabricated, and its forming limit compared with the conventional forming limit of AA 6061 obtained by a Nakajima test.