Chong-Han Kua , Angel Shi Hui Yau , E-Young Ang , Garion Goh , Nicole Si Hui Tan , Shin Yan Kok , Sok Kem Tay , Toviel Hwee Sim Tan , Viswanadham Satya Harshita
{"title":"Gen AI与焦点小组讨论的比较:开发处方应用程序以协助药物审查的工作流程和设计建议的发现。","authors":"Chong-Han Kua , Angel Shi Hui Yau , E-Young Ang , Garion Goh , Nicole Si Hui Tan , Shin Yan Kok , Sok Kem Tay , Toviel Hwee Sim Tan , Viswanadham Satya Harshita","doi":"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.015","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":48126,"journal":{"name":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","volume":"21 11","pages":"Page e2"},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A comparison of Gen AI vs focus group discussion: Findings on workflow and design recommendation to develop a deprescribing application to assist medication review.\",\"authors\":\"Chong-Han Kua , Angel Shi Hui Yau , E-Young Ang , Garion Goh , Nicole Si Hui Tan , Shin Yan Kok , Sok Kem Tay , Toviel Hwee Sim Tan , Viswanadham Satya Harshita\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sapharm.2025.02.015\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":48126,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"volume\":\"21 11\",\"pages\":\"Page e2\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741125001494\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Social & Administrative Pharmacy","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1551741125001494","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
A comparison of Gen AI vs focus group discussion: Findings on workflow and design recommendation to develop a deprescribing application to assist medication review.
期刊介绍:
Research in Social and Administrative Pharmacy (RSAP) is a quarterly publication featuring original scientific reports and comprehensive review articles in the social and administrative pharmaceutical sciences. Topics of interest include outcomes evaluation of products, programs, or services; pharmacoepidemiology; medication adherence; direct-to-consumer advertising of prescription medications; disease state management; health systems reform; drug marketing; medication distribution systems such as e-prescribing; web-based pharmaceutical/medical services; drug commerce and re-importation; and health professions workforce issues.