Gerardo Tusman , Stephan H. Böhm , Fernando Suarez-Sipmann
{"title":"用“理想”肺泡气体的概念和在通气动物中用可能的方法测定PAO2","authors":"Gerardo Tusman , Stephan H. Böhm , Fernando Suarez-Sipmann","doi":"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104474","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The Ideal Alveolar Gas Concept calculates the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PAO<sub>2</sub>) using arterial (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) instead of alveolar (PACO<sub>2</sub>) partial pressures of carbon dioxide in the alveolar gas equation. We compared the effects of shunt on PAO<sub>2</sub> calculated by the “ideal” gas concept with a calculation using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). We tested the hypothesis that shunt affects PACO<sub>2</sub> and introduces significant errors in the estimation of PAO<sub>2</sub> in two experimental porcine models. First, in a lung-lavage model (n = 10), shunt changes were induced by applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. PaCO<sub>2</sub> median 71 mmHg, (IQR 21 mmHg) was higher than MIGET PACO<sub>2</sub> 52(20) mmHg (p < 0.001). Ideal PAO<sub>2</sub> 654(33) mmHg was lower than MIGET PAO<sub>2</sub> 670(19) mmHg (p < 0.001). Bias in PAO<sub>2</sub> was −23 mmHg with limits of agreement between 19 to −65 mmHg. Second, in a one-lung ventilation model (n = 10), changes in shunt were performed decreasing cardiac output by inferior vena cava balloon inflations (OLV<sub>CB</sub>), inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary constriction with nitroprusiate (OLV<sub>NPS</sub>) and increasing cardiac output with dobutamine (OLV<sub>DBT</sub>). Baseline PaCO<sub>2</sub> was 55(10) mmHg and shunt 9(19)%. Cardiac output reduction did not affect PaCO<sub>2</sub> 57(9) mmHg (p = 0.19) or shunt 9(15)% (p = 0.570). Inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction increased PaCO<sub>2</sub> [62(13) mmHg; p = 0.083] and shunt [26(20)%; p = 0.020]. Cardiac output increase resulted in higher PaCO<sub>2</sub> [67(11) mmHg; p = 0.004] and shunt [30(29)%; p = 0.012]. The assumption of the ideal gas concept that PaCO<sub>2</sub> is not affected by shunt is incorrect introducing significant estimation errors in the alveolar gas equation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20961,"journal":{"name":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","volume":"338 ","pages":"Article 104474"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Determination of PAO2 by the “ideal” alveolar gas concept and by miget in ventilated animals\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Tusman , Stephan H. Böhm , Fernando Suarez-Sipmann\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resp.2025.104474\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The Ideal Alveolar Gas Concept calculates the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PAO<sub>2</sub>) using arterial (PaCO<sub>2</sub>) instead of alveolar (PACO<sub>2</sub>) partial pressures of carbon dioxide in the alveolar gas equation. We compared the effects of shunt on PAO<sub>2</sub> calculated by the “ideal” gas concept with a calculation using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). We tested the hypothesis that shunt affects PACO<sub>2</sub> and introduces significant errors in the estimation of PAO<sub>2</sub> in two experimental porcine models. First, in a lung-lavage model (n = 10), shunt changes were induced by applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. PaCO<sub>2</sub> median 71 mmHg, (IQR 21 mmHg) was higher than MIGET PACO<sub>2</sub> 52(20) mmHg (p < 0.001). Ideal PAO<sub>2</sub> 654(33) mmHg was lower than MIGET PAO<sub>2</sub> 670(19) mmHg (p < 0.001). Bias in PAO<sub>2</sub> was −23 mmHg with limits of agreement between 19 to −65 mmHg. Second, in a one-lung ventilation model (n = 10), changes in shunt were performed decreasing cardiac output by inferior vena cava balloon inflations (OLV<sub>CB</sub>), inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary constriction with nitroprusiate (OLV<sub>NPS</sub>) and increasing cardiac output with dobutamine (OLV<sub>DBT</sub>). Baseline PaCO<sub>2</sub> was 55(10) mmHg and shunt 9(19)%. Cardiac output reduction did not affect PaCO<sub>2</sub> 57(9) mmHg (p = 0.19) or shunt 9(15)% (p = 0.570). Inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction increased PaCO<sub>2</sub> [62(13) mmHg; p = 0.083] and shunt [26(20)%; p = 0.020]. Cardiac output increase resulted in higher PaCO<sub>2</sub> [67(11) mmHg; p = 0.004] and shunt [30(29)%; p = 0.012]. The assumption of the ideal gas concept that PaCO<sub>2</sub> is not affected by shunt is incorrect introducing significant estimation errors in the alveolar gas equation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"volume\":\"338 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104474\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000850\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PHYSIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1569904825000850","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PHYSIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Determination of PAO2 by the “ideal” alveolar gas concept and by miget in ventilated animals
The Ideal Alveolar Gas Concept calculates the alveolar partial pressure of oxygen (PAO2) using arterial (PaCO2) instead of alveolar (PACO2) partial pressures of carbon dioxide in the alveolar gas equation. We compared the effects of shunt on PAO2 calculated by the “ideal” gas concept with a calculation using the multiple inert gas elimination technique (MIGET). We tested the hypothesis that shunt affects PACO2 and introduces significant errors in the estimation of PAO2 in two experimental porcine models. First, in a lung-lavage model (n = 10), shunt changes were induced by applying different levels of positive end-expiratory pressure. PaCO2 median 71 mmHg, (IQR 21 mmHg) was higher than MIGET PACO2 52(20) mmHg (p < 0.001). Ideal PAO2 654(33) mmHg was lower than MIGET PAO2 670(19) mmHg (p < 0.001). Bias in PAO2 was −23 mmHg with limits of agreement between 19 to −65 mmHg. Second, in a one-lung ventilation model (n = 10), changes in shunt were performed decreasing cardiac output by inferior vena cava balloon inflations (OLVCB), inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary constriction with nitroprusiate (OLVNPS) and increasing cardiac output with dobutamine (OLVDBT). Baseline PaCO2 was 55(10) mmHg and shunt 9(19)%. Cardiac output reduction did not affect PaCO2 57(9) mmHg (p = 0.19) or shunt 9(15)% (p = 0.570). Inhibiting hypoxic pulmonary vasoconstriction increased PaCO2 [62(13) mmHg; p = 0.083] and shunt [26(20)%; p = 0.020]. Cardiac output increase resulted in higher PaCO2 [67(11) mmHg; p = 0.004] and shunt [30(29)%; p = 0.012]. The assumption of the ideal gas concept that PaCO2 is not affected by shunt is incorrect introducing significant estimation errors in the alveolar gas equation.
期刊介绍:
Respiratory Physiology & Neurobiology (RESPNB) publishes original articles and invited reviews concerning physiology and pathophysiology of respiration in its broadest sense.
Although a special focus is on topics in neurobiology, high quality papers in respiratory molecular and cellular biology are also welcome, as are high-quality papers in traditional areas, such as:
-Mechanics of breathing-
Gas exchange and acid-base balance-
Respiration at rest and exercise-
Respiration in unusual conditions, like high or low pressure or changes of temperature, low ambient oxygen-
Embryonic and adult respiration-
Comparative respiratory physiology.
Papers on clinical aspects, original methods, as well as theoretical papers are also considered as long as they foster the understanding of respiratory physiology and pathophysiology.