Marco Catarci , Stefano Guadagni , Marco Scatizzi , Raffaele De Luca , Paolo Delrio , Giacomo Ruffo , Felice Borghi , Francesco Masedu
{"title":"结直肠癌择期手术后增强的恢复和生存——2865名预期患者的倾向评分加权分析","authors":"Marco Catarci , Stefano Guadagni , Marco Scatizzi , Raffaele De Luca , Paolo Delrio , Giacomo Ruffo , Felice Borghi , Francesco Masedu","doi":"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110379","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) on survival after colorectal cancer surgery (CCS) remains controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A total of 2865 adults enrolled in a multicenter cohort study (iCral3 study) after CCS were followed up. The percentage adherence to the ERP was recorded, and the patients were grouped according to their quartiles. Other patient-, center-, disease-, and treatment-related factors were considered in a machine learning generalized boosted model (GBM) to estimate the 22 covariates propensity score weights for the binary comparisons between the reference treatment (1st quartile, ERP adherence rates <57.7 %) and the other treatment arms (2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A GBM-weighted Cox model balanced on the same covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the 4th quartile (ERP adherence rates ≥80.8 %) showed a significant lower risk of death from any cause (HR, 0.69; 95 %CI 0.49–0.96; p = 0.026).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High adherence to ERP was associated to a significant impact on long-term overall survival, supporting the efforts towards proper ERP implementation after CCS.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11522,"journal":{"name":"Ejso","volume":"51 11","pages":"Article 110379"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Enhanced recovery and survival after elective surgery for colorectal cancer - propensity score weighting analysis of 2,865 prospective patients\",\"authors\":\"Marco Catarci , Stefano Guadagni , Marco Scatizzi , Raffaele De Luca , Paolo Delrio , Giacomo Ruffo , Felice Borghi , Francesco Masedu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110379\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div>The impact of enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) on survival after colorectal cancer surgery (CCS) remains controversial.</div></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><div>A total of 2865 adults enrolled in a multicenter cohort study (iCral3 study) after CCS were followed up. The percentage adherence to the ERP was recorded, and the patients were grouped according to their quartiles. Other patient-, center-, disease-, and treatment-related factors were considered in a machine learning generalized boosted model (GBM) to estimate the 22 covariates propensity score weights for the binary comparisons between the reference treatment (1st quartile, ERP adherence rates <57.7 %) and the other treatment arms (2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A GBM-weighted Cox model balanced on the same covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Patients in the 4th quartile (ERP adherence rates ≥80.8 %) showed a significant lower risk of death from any cause (HR, 0.69; 95 %CI 0.49–0.96; p = 0.026).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>High adherence to ERP was associated to a significant impact on long-term overall survival, supporting the efforts towards proper ERP implementation after CCS.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ejso\",\"volume\":\"51 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 110379\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ejso\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008078\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ejso","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0748798325008078","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Enhanced recovery and survival after elective surgery for colorectal cancer - propensity score weighting analysis of 2,865 prospective patients
Background
The impact of enhanced recovery pathway (ERP) on survival after colorectal cancer surgery (CCS) remains controversial.
Materials and methods
A total of 2865 adults enrolled in a multicenter cohort study (iCral3 study) after CCS were followed up. The percentage adherence to the ERP was recorded, and the patients were grouped according to their quartiles. Other patient-, center-, disease-, and treatment-related factors were considered in a machine learning generalized boosted model (GBM) to estimate the 22 covariates propensity score weights for the binary comparisons between the reference treatment (1st quartile, ERP adherence rates <57.7 %) and the other treatment arms (2nd, 3rd, and 4th quartile). The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). A GBM-weighted Cox model balanced on the same covariates was used to estimate the hazard ratio (HR) and 95 % confidence interval (95 %CI).
Results
Patients in the 4th quartile (ERP adherence rates ≥80.8 %) showed a significant lower risk of death from any cause (HR, 0.69; 95 %CI 0.49–0.96; p = 0.026).
Conclusions
High adherence to ERP was associated to a significant impact on long-term overall survival, supporting the efforts towards proper ERP implementation after CCS.
期刊介绍:
JSO - European Journal of Surgical Oncology ("the Journal of Cancer Surgery") is the Official Journal of the European Society of Surgical Oncology and BASO ~ the Association for Cancer Surgery.
The EJSO aims to advance surgical oncology research and practice through the publication of original research articles, review articles, editorials, debates and correspondence.