衔接工艺:铅同位素揭示了中国战国铅釉陶器的创新

IF 2.5 1区 地球科学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Jingyi Shen , Chao Geng , Ruiliang Liu , Yichao Zhao , Zhigang Wu , Kui Chen , Yu Peng , Ji Zhang , Jianfeng Lang
{"title":"衔接工艺:铅同位素揭示了中国战国铅釉陶器的创新","authors":"Jingyi Shen ,&nbsp;Chao Geng ,&nbsp;Ruiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Yichao Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhigang Wu ,&nbsp;Kui Chen ,&nbsp;Yu Peng ,&nbsp;Ji Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Lang","doi":"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106354","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This study reassesses the origin of low-fired lead-glazed pottery in ancient China through a systematic analysis of seven excavated specimens from the ancient Linzi City, the capital of the Qi State, dated to the late Warring States period (300–221 BCE). By integrating archaeological context, compositional and lead isotopic analysis, the research establishes these ceramics as the earliest scientifically verified lead-glazed pottery in China. The findings indicate that these wares were produced using a standardized technological protocol, locally sourced clay bodies coated with high-lead glazes (50–62 wt% PbO), exclusively colored by iron oxide (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), and fired in a reducing atmosphere, which represent a rather different process compared to the typical Chinese lead glaze technology since the Western Han dynasty (202BCE-8CE). Moreover, lead isotopic data attribute the lead source to highly radiogenic deposits that were locally available and mined for Qi bronze production, revealing a shared lead supply to both ceramic and metallurgical production. The study argues that the initial development of lead glazing emerged as a result of cross-craft interaction involving ceramic production, proto-porcelain, lead-barium siliceous materials, and, most significantly, leaded bronze manufacturing. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the earliest lead-glazed pottery, underscore the significance of cross-craft interactions in technological innovation, and reframe the Qi State as a key center for early ceramic experimentation.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50254,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Archaeological Science","volume":"182 ","pages":"Article 106354"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridging the crafts: lead isotopes reveal the innovation of lead-glazed pottery in Warring States China\",\"authors\":\"Jingyi Shen ,&nbsp;Chao Geng ,&nbsp;Ruiliang Liu ,&nbsp;Yichao Zhao ,&nbsp;Zhigang Wu ,&nbsp;Kui Chen ,&nbsp;Yu Peng ,&nbsp;Ji Zhang ,&nbsp;Jianfeng Lang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jas.2025.106354\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This study reassesses the origin of low-fired lead-glazed pottery in ancient China through a systematic analysis of seven excavated specimens from the ancient Linzi City, the capital of the Qi State, dated to the late Warring States period (300–221 BCE). By integrating archaeological context, compositional and lead isotopic analysis, the research establishes these ceramics as the earliest scientifically verified lead-glazed pottery in China. The findings indicate that these wares were produced using a standardized technological protocol, locally sourced clay bodies coated with high-lead glazes (50–62 wt% PbO), exclusively colored by iron oxide (Fe<sub>2</sub>O<sub>3</sub>), and fired in a reducing atmosphere, which represent a rather different process compared to the typical Chinese lead glaze technology since the Western Han dynasty (202BCE-8CE). Moreover, lead isotopic data attribute the lead source to highly radiogenic deposits that were locally available and mined for Qi bronze production, revealing a shared lead supply to both ceramic and metallurgical production. The study argues that the initial development of lead glazing emerged as a result of cross-craft interaction involving ceramic production, proto-porcelain, lead-barium siliceous materials, and, most significantly, leaded bronze manufacturing. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the earliest lead-glazed pottery, underscore the significance of cross-craft interactions in technological innovation, and reframe the Qi State as a key center for early ceramic experimentation.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"volume\":\"182 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Archaeological Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002031\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Archaeological Science","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0305440325002031","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究通过系统分析七个出土于战国晚期(公元前300-221年)齐国首都临淄城的样品,重新评估了中国古代低烧铅釉陶器的起源。通过综合考古背景、成分分析和铅同位素分析,确定这些陶瓷是中国最早的经科学验证的铅釉陶。研究结果表明,这些瓷器是使用标准化的技术方案生产的,当地采购的粘土体涂有高铅釉(50 - 62% PbO),仅用氧化铁(Fe2O3)着色,并在还原气氛中烧制,与西汉以来典型的中国铅釉技术相比,这是一个完全不同的过程(公元前202 - 8ce)。此外,铅同位素数据将铅的来源归因于当地可获得的高放射性矿床,并开采用于Qi青铜生产,揭示了陶瓷和冶金生产的共同铅供应。该研究认为,铅釉的最初发展是陶瓷生产、原始瓷器、铅钡硅质材料以及最重要的铅青铜制造等交叉工艺相互作用的结果。这些发现有助于对目前关于最早的铅釉陶器的争论,强调了技术创新中跨工艺互动的重要性,并将齐国重新定位为早期陶瓷实验的关键中心。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridging the crafts: lead isotopes reveal the innovation of lead-glazed pottery in Warring States China
This study reassesses the origin of low-fired lead-glazed pottery in ancient China through a systematic analysis of seven excavated specimens from the ancient Linzi City, the capital of the Qi State, dated to the late Warring States period (300–221 BCE). By integrating archaeological context, compositional and lead isotopic analysis, the research establishes these ceramics as the earliest scientifically verified lead-glazed pottery in China. The findings indicate that these wares were produced using a standardized technological protocol, locally sourced clay bodies coated with high-lead glazes (50–62 wt% PbO), exclusively colored by iron oxide (Fe2O3), and fired in a reducing atmosphere, which represent a rather different process compared to the typical Chinese lead glaze technology since the Western Han dynasty (202BCE-8CE). Moreover, lead isotopic data attribute the lead source to highly radiogenic deposits that were locally available and mined for Qi bronze production, revealing a shared lead supply to both ceramic and metallurgical production. The study argues that the initial development of lead glazing emerged as a result of cross-craft interaction involving ceramic production, proto-porcelain, lead-barium siliceous materials, and, most significantly, leaded bronze manufacturing. These findings contribute to the ongoing debate regarding the earliest lead-glazed pottery, underscore the significance of cross-craft interactions in technological innovation, and reframe the Qi State as a key center for early ceramic experimentation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Archaeological Science
Journal of Archaeological Science 地学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
7.10%
发文量
112
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Archaeological Science is aimed at archaeologists and scientists with particular interests in advancing the development and application of scientific techniques and methodologies to all areas of archaeology. This established monthly journal publishes focus articles, original research papers and major review articles, of wide archaeological significance. The journal provides an international forum for archaeologists and scientists from widely different scientific backgrounds who share a common interest in developing and applying scientific methods to inform major debates through improving the quality and reliability of scientific information derived from archaeological research.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信