Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly , Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe , Barclaye Ngossanga , Ynous Djida , Jacob Werner , Rella Zoleko Manego , Roland C. Zinga Koumba , Rodrigue Mintsa , Ayôla A. Adegnika , Albert Eisenbarth , Michael Ramharter
{"title":"加蓬Loa Loa高流行区皮肤应用节肢动物驱蚊剂对金蛉叮咬的保护效果:避蚊胺、心红素、柠檬醇和IR3535的安慰剂对照随机临床试验","authors":"Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly , Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe , Barclaye Ngossanga , Ynous Djida , Jacob Werner , Rella Zoleko Manego , Roland C. Zinga Koumba , Rodrigue Mintsa , Ayôla A. Adegnika , Albert Eisenbarth , Michael Ramharter","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –</em>is transmitted by deer fly species <em>Chrysops dimidiata</em> and <em>C. silacea</em>. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by <em>Chrysops</em> flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p < 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p < 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102899"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective efficacy of skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a Loa loa hyperendemic region in Gabon: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, and IR3535\",\"authors\":\"Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly , Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe , Barclaye Ngossanga , Ynous Djida , Jacob Werner , Rella Zoleko Manego , Roland C. Zinga Koumba , Rodrigue Mintsa , Ayôla A. Adegnika , Albert Eisenbarth , Michael Ramharter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –</em>is transmitted by deer fly species <em>Chrysops dimidiata</em> and <em>C. silacea</em>. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by <em>Chrysops</em> flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p < 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p < 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500105X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500105X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Protective efficacy of skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a Loa loa hyperendemic region in Gabon: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, and IR3535
Background
Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –is transmitted by deer fly species Chrysops dimidiata and C. silacea. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against Chrysops bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.
Methods
Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by Chrysops flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of Chrysops landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).
Results
Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p < 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p < 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of Chrysops landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).
Conclusions
Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.
期刊介绍:
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Publication Scope:
Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers
Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine
Focus Areas:
Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness
Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections
Malaria prevention and treatment
Travellers' diarrhoea
Infections associated with mass gatherings
Migration-related infections
Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease
Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control
Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners
Coverage:
Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine
Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease
Publication Features:
Offers a fast peer-review process
Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts
Aims to publish cutting-edge papers