加蓬Loa Loa高流行区皮肤应用节肢动物驱蚊剂对金蛉叮咬的保护效果:避蚊胺、心红素、柠檬醇和IR3535的安慰剂对照随机临床试验

IF 4.7 3区 医学 Q1 INFECTIOUS DISEASES
Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly , Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe , Barclaye Ngossanga , Ynous Djida , Jacob Werner , Rella Zoleko Manego , Roland C. Zinga Koumba , Rodrigue Mintsa , Ayôla A. Adegnika , Albert Eisenbarth , Michael Ramharter
{"title":"加蓬Loa Loa高流行区皮肤应用节肢动物驱蚊剂对金蛉叮咬的保护效果:避蚊胺、心红素、柠檬醇和IR3535的安慰剂对照随机临床试验","authors":"Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly ,&nbsp;Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe ,&nbsp;Barclaye Ngossanga ,&nbsp;Ynous Djida ,&nbsp;Jacob Werner ,&nbsp;Rella Zoleko Manego ,&nbsp;Roland C. Zinga Koumba ,&nbsp;Rodrigue Mintsa ,&nbsp;Ayôla A. Adegnika ,&nbsp;Albert Eisenbarth ,&nbsp;Michael Ramharter","doi":"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102899","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –</em>is transmitted by deer fly species <em>Chrysops dimidiata</em> and <em>C. silacea</em>. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by <em>Chrysops</em> flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p &lt; 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p &lt; 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":23312,"journal":{"name":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","volume":"67 ","pages":"Article 102899"},"PeriodicalIF":4.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Protective efficacy of skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a Loa loa hyperendemic region in Gabon: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, and IR3535\",\"authors\":\"Ange G. Doumba Ndalembouly ,&nbsp;Stravensky T. Boussougou-Sambe ,&nbsp;Barclaye Ngossanga ,&nbsp;Ynous Djida ,&nbsp;Jacob Werner ,&nbsp;Rella Zoleko Manego ,&nbsp;Roland C. Zinga Koumba ,&nbsp;Rodrigue Mintsa ,&nbsp;Ayôla A. Adegnika ,&nbsp;Albert Eisenbarth ,&nbsp;Michael Ramharter\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.tmaid.2025.102899\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><div><em>Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –</em>is transmitted by deer fly species <em>Chrysops dimidiata</em> and <em>C. silacea</em>. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against <em>Chrysops</em> bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by <em>Chrysops</em> flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p &lt; 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p &lt; 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of <em>Chrysops</em> landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"volume\":\"67 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102899\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500105X\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"INFECTIOUS DISEASES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S147789392500105X","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"INFECTIOUS DISEASES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

loa loa是一种引起loasis的丝状病原体,由鹿蝇种Chrysops dimidiata和C. silacea传播。没有既定的控制工具可用于减少地方病传播。虽然对其他节肢动物使用驱蚊剂进行了探索,但对人类对金蛹叮咬的保护效果尚未进行系统评估。这项随机对照临床试验的目的是评估加蓬高流行地区四种商业皮肤应用节肢动物驱避剂对金蛉叮咬的效果。方法志愿者被随机分配使用避蚊胺、心红素、柠檬醇、IR3535或无活性对照。研究的主要终点是金蝇尝试吸血的次数。次要结局是白蛉落在衣服和皮肤上的频率和持续时间。本研究已在泛非临床试验注册中心注册(PACTR202406779622099)。结果柠檬酸二醇(- 50%,p = 0.04)和避蚊胺(- 50%,p < 0.001)显著降低了血餐次数,但伊卡苷(0%,p = 0.48)和IR3535 (0%, p = 0.69)没有显著降低血餐次数。同样,柠檬酸二醇(- 66%,p = 0.02)和避蚊胺(- 46%,p < 0.001)显著缩短了苍蝇在皮肤上停留的时间,但鸢尾素(+ 2%,p = 0.35)和IR3535 (0%, p = 0.93)没有显著缩短。相反,避蚊胺和鸢尾素对未处理衣物上的瓢虫数量没有减少,而柠檬醇和IR3535处理的个体则有更多的瓢虫降落(p = 0.005和p = 0.01)。结论氯吡二醇和避蚊胺对蜱病媒介的叮咬有一定的保护作用,但保护作用不完全。Icaridin和IR3535无效。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Protective efficacy of skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a Loa loa hyperendemic region in Gabon: A placebo-controlled randomized clinical trial of DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, and IR3535

Background

Loa loa – a filarial pathogen causing loiasis –is transmitted by deer fly species Chrysops dimidiata and C. silacea. There are no established control tools available to reduce loiasis transmission in endemic regions. Although the use of repellents has been explored against other arthropods, their protective efficacy against Chrysops bites in humans has not yet been systematically evaluated. The aim of this randomized controlled clinical trial was to assess the efficacy of four commercial skin-applied arthropod repellents against Chrysops bites in a hyperendemic region in Gabon.

Methods

Volunteers were randomly assigned to apply the skin repellents DEET, icaridin, citriodiol, IR3535 or an inactive control. The primary endpoint was the number of blood meal attempts by Chrysops flies. Secondary outcomes were the frequency and duration of Chrysops landings on clothing and skin. This study is registered with the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202406779622099).

Results

Blood meal attempts were significantly reduced by citriodiol (−50 %, p = 0.04) and DEET (−50 %, p < 0.001), but not by icaridin (0 %, p = 0.48) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.69). Concordantly, the time spent by the fly on the skin was significantly shortened by citriodiol (−66 %, p = 0.02) and DEET (−46 %, p < 0.001), but not with icaridin (+2 %, p = 0.35) and IR3535 (0 %, p = 0.93). Conversely, the number of Chrysops landings on untreated clothing was not reduced by DEET and icaridin, while citriodiol and IR3535 treated individuals experienced a higher number of landings (p = 0.005 and p = 0.01, respectively).

Conclusions

Citriodiol and DEET showed substantial but not complete protective efficacy against the bite of loiasis vectors. Icaridin and IR3535 were ineffective.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH-INFECTIOUS DISEASES
CiteScore
19.40
自引率
1.70%
发文量
211
审稿时长
49 days
期刊介绍: Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease Publication Scope: Publishes original papers, reviews, and consensus papers Primary theme: infectious disease in the context of travel medicine Focus Areas: Epidemiology and surveillance of travel-related illness Prevention and treatment of travel-associated infections Malaria prevention and treatment Travellers' diarrhoea Infections associated with mass gatherings Migration-related infections Vaccines and vaccine-preventable disease Global policy/regulations for disease prevention and control Practical clinical issues for travel and tropical medicine practitioners Coverage: Addresses areas of controversy and debate in travel medicine Aims to inform guidelines and policy pertinent to travel medicine and the prevention of infectious disease Publication Features: Offers a fast peer-review process Provides early online publication of accepted manuscripts Aims to publish cutting-edge papers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信