危害汇编:烟草、慢性阻塞性肺病和粘液塞。文献系统回顾与元分析

Q4 Medicine
José Ignacio de Granda-Orive , Daniel López-Padilla , Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo , Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent , Segismundo Solano-Reina , Carlos Rábade-Castedo , Miguel Jiménez-Gómez , Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz
{"title":"危害汇编:烟草、慢性阻塞性肺病和粘液塞。文献系统回顾与元分析","authors":"José Ignacio de Granda-Orive ,&nbsp;Daniel López-Padilla ,&nbsp;Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo ,&nbsp;Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent ,&nbsp;Segismundo Solano-Reina ,&nbsp;Carlos Rábade-Castedo ,&nbsp;Miguel Jiménez-Gómez ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz","doi":"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100479","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In COPD patients, mucus plugs are associated with lower lung function, worse quality of life, higher all-cause mortality, and a higher rate of exacerbations. The aim of the study was to determine whether subjects with COPD with a higher cumulative smoking history, such as current smokers, have a higher mucus plug score compared to former and never smokers with COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We have carried out a systematic review of the literature (SRL) and a meta-analysis (MA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine articles were finally included in the SRL, and 6 of them were part of the MA. We found that subjects who had never smoked had a lower rate of mucus plugs when compared to active and ex-smokers (OR 0.08 [CI 95% 0.06, 0.12]). When comparing subjects with and without mucus plugs between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers (OR 1.12 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.24]). When comparing subjects without mucus plugs or with a low mucus plug score (0–2) with a high mucus plug score (&gt;3) between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher mucus plug score than current smokers (OR 1.19 [CI 95% 1.08, 1.32]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that subjects who have never smoked have a lower rate of mucus plugs than those who have smoked and that ex-smokers with COPD have a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers with COPD. Quitting smoking is the most significant modifiable risk factor for COPD.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":34317,"journal":{"name":"Open Respiratory Archives","volume":"7 3","pages":"Article 100479"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Compilation of Harm: Tobacco, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Mucus Plugs. Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"José Ignacio de Granda-Orive ,&nbsp;Daniel López-Padilla ,&nbsp;Adolfo Alonso-Arroyo ,&nbsp;Rafael Aleixandre-Benavent ,&nbsp;Segismundo Solano-Reina ,&nbsp;Carlos Rábade-Castedo ,&nbsp;Miguel Jiménez-Gómez ,&nbsp;Carlos A. Jiménez-Ruiz\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.opresp.2025.100479\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>In COPD patients, mucus plugs are associated with lower lung function, worse quality of life, higher all-cause mortality, and a higher rate of exacerbations. The aim of the study was to determine whether subjects with COPD with a higher cumulative smoking history, such as current smokers, have a higher mucus plug score compared to former and never smokers with COPD.</div></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><div>We have carried out a systematic review of the literature (SRL) and a meta-analysis (MA).</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Nine articles were finally included in the SRL, and 6 of them were part of the MA. We found that subjects who had never smoked had a lower rate of mucus plugs when compared to active and ex-smokers (OR 0.08 [CI 95% 0.06, 0.12]). When comparing subjects with and without mucus plugs between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers (OR 1.12 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.24]). When comparing subjects without mucus plugs or with a low mucus plug score (0–2) with a high mucus plug score (&gt;3) between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher mucus plug score than current smokers (OR 1.19 [CI 95% 1.08, 1.32]).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><div>We found that subjects who have never smoked have a lower rate of mucus plugs than those who have smoked and that ex-smokers with COPD have a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers with COPD. Quitting smoking is the most significant modifiable risk factor for COPD.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34317,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"volume\":\"7 3\",\"pages\":\"Article 100479\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Open Respiratory Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000839\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Open Respiratory Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2659663625000839","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在COPD患者中,粘液塞与肺功能降低、生活质量下降、全因死亡率升高和病情加重率升高相关。该研究的目的是确定具有较高累积吸烟史的COPD受试者,如当前吸烟者,是否与以前和从不吸烟的COPD患者相比具有更高的粘液堵塞评分。材料和方法我们进行了文献系统综述(SRL)和荟萃分析(MA)。结果9篇文章最终被纳入SRL,其中6篇是MA的一部分。我们发现,从不吸烟的受试者与活跃吸烟者和戒烟者相比,粘液塞的发生率较低(OR 0.08 [CI 95% 0.06, 0.12])。当比较当前吸烟者和已戒烟者中使用和不使用黏液塞的受试者时,我们发现已戒烟者的黏液塞发生率高于当前吸烟者(OR 1.12 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.24])。当比较没有粘液塞或低粘液塞评分(0-2)与高粘液塞评分(>3)的受试者时,我们发现,前吸烟者的粘液塞评分高于现吸烟者(or 1.19 [CI 95% 1.08, 1.32])。结论:我们发现从不吸烟的受试者粘液塞的发生率低于吸烟的受试者,而已戒烟的COPD患者粘液塞的发生率高于正在吸烟的COPD患者。戒烟是COPD最重要的可改变危险因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Compilation of Harm: Tobacco, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Mucus Plugs. Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Compilation of Harm: Tobacco, Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease, and Mucus Plugs. Systematic Review of the Literature and Meta-Analysis

Introduction

In COPD patients, mucus plugs are associated with lower lung function, worse quality of life, higher all-cause mortality, and a higher rate of exacerbations. The aim of the study was to determine whether subjects with COPD with a higher cumulative smoking history, such as current smokers, have a higher mucus plug score compared to former and never smokers with COPD.

Material and methods

We have carried out a systematic review of the literature (SRL) and a meta-analysis (MA).

Results

Nine articles were finally included in the SRL, and 6 of them were part of the MA. We found that subjects who had never smoked had a lower rate of mucus plugs when compared to active and ex-smokers (OR 0.08 [CI 95% 0.06, 0.12]). When comparing subjects with and without mucus plugs between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers (OR 1.12 [CI 95% 1.02, 1.24]). When comparing subjects without mucus plugs or with a low mucus plug score (0–2) with a high mucus plug score (>3) between current smokers vs. ex-smokers, we found that ex-smokers had a higher mucus plug score than current smokers (OR 1.19 [CI 95% 1.08, 1.32]).

Conclusions

We found that subjects who have never smoked have a lower rate of mucus plugs than those who have smoked and that ex-smokers with COPD have a higher rate of mucus plugs than current smokers with COPD. Quitting smoking is the most significant modifiable risk factor for COPD.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Open Respiratory Archives
Open Respiratory Archives Medicine-Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
58
审稿时长
51 days
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信