瞬态条件下500mpa以上高强度结构钢的高温力学性能

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Jun Yan , Chao Zhang
{"title":"瞬态条件下500mpa以上高强度结构钢的高温力学性能","authors":"Jun Yan ,&nbsp;Chao Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104505","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The mechanical properties of high-strength structural steel (HSSS) at elevated temperatures are critical for structural fire safety design and analysis. While most previous studies have used the steady-state test method because it requires less time and directly provides stress–strain curves, the transient-state method better simulates real fire scenarios where structural elements are preloaded before heating and creep effects may become significant. This paper presents an experimental investigation of Q550, Q690, and Q890 steels using transient-state test method. The mechanical properties of elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength and stress-strain curve are measured and compared with steady-state test results. The results show notable differences between the two test methods: the reduction factors for mechanical properties obtained from steady-state tests are consistently higher than those from transient-state tests. Unified models for reduction factors of elastic modulus and yield strength of HSSSs are derived from curve fitting of the transient-state test data. Additionally, the applicability of existing models to predict the reduction factors has been investigated. Among the five existing models (EC3, ASCE Manual, NIST, AS 4100, and GB 51249), AS 4100 provides conservative predictions for yield strength, while GB 51249 offers conservative estimates for elastic modulus. The EC3 stress–strain model is shown to be applicable to HSSS at elevated temperatures.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104505"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Elevated-temperature mechanical properties of high-strength structural steels over 500 MPa under transient state conditions\",\"authors\":\"Jun Yan ,&nbsp;Chao Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104505\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The mechanical properties of high-strength structural steel (HSSS) at elevated temperatures are critical for structural fire safety design and analysis. While most previous studies have used the steady-state test method because it requires less time and directly provides stress–strain curves, the transient-state method better simulates real fire scenarios where structural elements are preloaded before heating and creep effects may become significant. This paper presents an experimental investigation of Q550, Q690, and Q890 steels using transient-state test method. The mechanical properties of elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength and stress-strain curve are measured and compared with steady-state test results. The results show notable differences between the two test methods: the reduction factors for mechanical properties obtained from steady-state tests are consistently higher than those from transient-state tests. Unified models for reduction factors of elastic modulus and yield strength of HSSSs are derived from curve fitting of the transient-state test data. Additionally, the applicability of existing models to predict the reduction factors has been investigated. Among the five existing models (EC3, ASCE Manual, NIST, AS 4100, and GB 51249), AS 4100 provides conservative predictions for yield strength, while GB 51249 offers conservative estimates for elastic modulus. The EC3 stress–strain model is shown to be applicable to HSSS at elevated temperatures.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104505\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001699\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001699","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

高温下高强度结构钢(HSSS)的力学性能对结构防火安全设计和分析至关重要。以往的研究大多采用稳态试验方法,因为它需要更少的时间和直接提供应力-应变曲线,而瞬态法更能模拟真实的火灾场景,在加热和蠕变效应变得明显之前,结构构件已经被预加载。本文对Q550、Q690和Q890钢进行了瞬态试验研究。测量了弹性模量、屈服强度、极限强度和应力应变曲线等力学性能,并与稳态试验结果进行了比较。结果表明,两种试验方法之间存在显著差异:稳态试验的力学性能折减系数始终高于瞬态试验的力学性能折减系数。通过对瞬态试验数据的曲线拟合,建立了弹性模量折减系数和屈服强度的统一模型。此外,还对现有模型在预测折减系数方面的适用性进行了研究。在现有的五个模型(EC3、ASCE Manual、NIST、AS 4100和GB 51249)中,AS 4100提供了屈服强度的保守预测,而GB 51249提供了弹性模量的保守估计。EC3应力-应变模型适用于高温下的HSSS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Elevated-temperature mechanical properties of high-strength structural steels over 500 MPa under transient state conditions
The mechanical properties of high-strength structural steel (HSSS) at elevated temperatures are critical for structural fire safety design and analysis. While most previous studies have used the steady-state test method because it requires less time and directly provides stress–strain curves, the transient-state method better simulates real fire scenarios where structural elements are preloaded before heating and creep effects may become significant. This paper presents an experimental investigation of Q550, Q690, and Q890 steels using transient-state test method. The mechanical properties of elastic modulus, yield strength, ultimate strength and stress-strain curve are measured and compared with steady-state test results. The results show notable differences between the two test methods: the reduction factors for mechanical properties obtained from steady-state tests are consistently higher than those from transient-state tests. Unified models for reduction factors of elastic modulus and yield strength of HSSSs are derived from curve fitting of the transient-state test data. Additionally, the applicability of existing models to predict the reduction factors has been investigated. Among the five existing models (EC3, ASCE Manual, NIST, AS 4100, and GB 51249), AS 4100 provides conservative predictions for yield strength, while GB 51249 offers conservative estimates for elastic modulus. The EC3 stress–strain model is shown to be applicable to HSSS at elevated temperatures.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信