能源转型中的行动者网络:巴西电力部门的争议和可能的路径

IF 7.4 2区 经济学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora , Anete Alberton , Diego Hernando Florez Ayala
{"title":"能源转型中的行动者网络:巴西电力部门的争议和可能的路径","authors":"Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora ,&nbsp;Anete Alberton ,&nbsp;Diego Hernando Florez Ayala","doi":"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104310","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The global challenge of transitioning to low-carbon energy systems has gained prominence recently, particularly in emerging economies such as Brazil. The shift towards sustainable energy systems poses significant technological, social, ecological, and political challenges. Actor-Network Theory (ANT) offers a relational understanding of agency within sociotechnical systems, emphasizing the importance of controversies in shaping energy transitions. We explore the complex network of actors involved in these transitions, highlighting how their interactions influence the process's technological, political, and societal aspects. Supported by a combination of primary data from 13 semi-structured interviews and secondary data from 20 webinars, this paper examines how actors' relationships interfere with the paths of the Brazilian energy transition. Based on discussing controversy mapping, our findings underscore the significance of understanding the interplay between business, legal, technical, and societal arrangements in advancing sustainable energy systems. We conclude that its nature allows for corroborating the premise that different visions of reality coexist in relation to the same phenomenon. Economic, institutional, and social agents desire to reduce carbon emissions, but each has other ideas for achieving this goal.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48384,"journal":{"name":"Energy Research & Social Science","volume":"127 ","pages":"Article 104310"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Actors networks in energy transitions: Controversies and possible paths in the Brazilian electricity sector\",\"authors\":\"Gabriela Almeida Marcon Nora ,&nbsp;Anete Alberton ,&nbsp;Diego Hernando Florez Ayala\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.erss.2025.104310\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The global challenge of transitioning to low-carbon energy systems has gained prominence recently, particularly in emerging economies such as Brazil. The shift towards sustainable energy systems poses significant technological, social, ecological, and political challenges. Actor-Network Theory (ANT) offers a relational understanding of agency within sociotechnical systems, emphasizing the importance of controversies in shaping energy transitions. We explore the complex network of actors involved in these transitions, highlighting how their interactions influence the process's technological, political, and societal aspects. Supported by a combination of primary data from 13 semi-structured interviews and secondary data from 20 webinars, this paper examines how actors' relationships interfere with the paths of the Brazilian energy transition. Based on discussing controversy mapping, our findings underscore the significance of understanding the interplay between business, legal, technical, and societal arrangements in advancing sustainable energy systems. We conclude that its nature allows for corroborating the premise that different visions of reality coexist in relation to the same phenomenon. Economic, institutional, and social agents desire to reduce carbon emissions, but each has other ideas for achieving this goal.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48384,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"volume\":\"127 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104310\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Research & Social Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003913\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Research & Social Science","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2214629625003913","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

向低碳能源系统转型的全球挑战最近变得尤为突出,尤其是在巴西等新兴经济体。向可持续能源系统的转变带来了重大的技术、社会、生态和政治挑战。行动者网络理论(ANT)提供了对社会技术系统内代理的关系理解,强调了塑造能源转型的争议的重要性。我们探索参与这些转变的行动者的复杂网络,强调他们的相互作用如何影响过程的技术,政治和社会方面。本文结合了13次半结构化访谈的主要数据和20次网络研讨会的次要数据,研究了参与者的关系如何影响巴西能源转型的路径。在讨论争议地图的基础上,我们的发现强调了理解商业、法律、技术和社会安排在推进可持续能源系统中的相互作用的重要性。我们的结论是,它的性质允许确证一个前提,即不同的现实愿景共存于同一现象。经济、制度和社会主体都希望减少碳排放,但对于实现这一目标,各方都有不同的想法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Actors networks in energy transitions: Controversies and possible paths in the Brazilian electricity sector
The global challenge of transitioning to low-carbon energy systems has gained prominence recently, particularly in emerging economies such as Brazil. The shift towards sustainable energy systems poses significant technological, social, ecological, and political challenges. Actor-Network Theory (ANT) offers a relational understanding of agency within sociotechnical systems, emphasizing the importance of controversies in shaping energy transitions. We explore the complex network of actors involved in these transitions, highlighting how their interactions influence the process's technological, political, and societal aspects. Supported by a combination of primary data from 13 semi-structured interviews and secondary data from 20 webinars, this paper examines how actors' relationships interfere with the paths of the Brazilian energy transition. Based on discussing controversy mapping, our findings underscore the significance of understanding the interplay between business, legal, technical, and societal arrangements in advancing sustainable energy systems. We conclude that its nature allows for corroborating the premise that different visions of reality coexist in relation to the same phenomenon. Economic, institutional, and social agents desire to reduce carbon emissions, but each has other ideas for achieving this goal.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Research & Social Science
Energy Research & Social Science ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
14.00
自引率
16.40%
发文量
441
审稿时长
55 days
期刊介绍: Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) is a peer-reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles examining the relationship between energy systems and society. ERSS covers a range of topics revolving around the intersection of energy technologies, fuels, and resources on one side and social processes and influences - including communities of energy users, people affected by energy production, social institutions, customs, traditions, behaviors, and policies - on the other. Put another way, ERSS investigates the social system surrounding energy technology and hardware. ERSS is relevant for energy practitioners, researchers interested in the social aspects of energy production or use, and policymakers. Energy Research & Social Science (ERSS) provides an interdisciplinary forum to discuss how social and technical issues related to energy production and consumption interact. Energy production, distribution, and consumption all have both technical and human components, and the latter involves the human causes and consequences of energy-related activities and processes as well as social structures that shape how people interact with energy systems. Energy analysis, therefore, needs to look beyond the dimensions of technology and economics to include these social and human elements.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信