为科学家建造一座城市：还有意义吗？

IF 6.6 1区经济学 Q1 URBAN STUDIES

Cities Pub Date : 2025-09-02 DOI:10.1016/j.cities.2025.106444

James W. Dearing

引用次数: 0

摘要

科学工作仍然是一座专门为科学工作而建的城市的特征吗？考虑到先进的电信技术的可用性，把科学设施放在同一地点以便受过不同训练的科学家在彼此附近工作仍然是负责任的政策吗？为了找到答案，作者回到了他40年前研究过的一个城市。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Building a city for scientists: Does it still make sense?

Does scientific work still characterize a city built exclusively for that purpose? Is co-location of scientific facilities so that differently trained scientists work near each other still a responsible policy given the availability of advanced telecommunications? The author returned to a city he studied 40 years ago to find out.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Cities URBAN STUDIES-

CiteScore

11.20

自引率

9.00%

发文量

517

期刊介绍： Cities offers a comprehensive range of articles on all aspects of urban policy. It provides an international and interdisciplinary platform for the exchange of ideas and information between urban planners and policy makers from national and local government, non-government organizations, academia and consultancy. The primary aims of the journal are to analyse and assess past and present urban development and management as a reflection of effective, ineffective and non-existent planning policies; and the promotion of the implementation of appropriate urban policies in both the developed and the developing world.