{"title":"放牧强度对干旱草原生态系统服务的影响及其管理意义","authors":"Mengqi Yuan , Fang Han","doi":"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101333","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Arid grassland ecosystems play a crucial role in maintaining regional ecological balance and supporting pastoral production. However, overgrazing and climate change have led to the degradation of ecosystem services (ESs). Understanding the complex relationship between grazing intensity (GI) and ESs is essential for achieving sustainable management of grassland ecosystems. This study focuses on the arid grasslands of Xinjiang, China, using dual-scale analysis (grid and county levels), and integrates multi-source data and models such as the Geodetector to evaluate the spatiotemporal dynamics of GI on ecosystem service capacity (ESCL) and synergy level (ESSL) from 2000 to 2020. Results show significant synergy among ESs, with GI playing a key interactive role in influencing them. Both ESCL and ESSL exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship with GI: at low GI (GI < 0.4), ESCL and ESSL demonstrate synergy, but when GI exceeds 0.6, a trade-off emerges. The impact of different grazing intensities on ESCL and ESSL varies significantly across spatial clusters, with medium grazing levels generally sustaining the sustainability of grassland ecosystems. In fragile regions like Southern Xinjiang, maintaining low GI is crucial for protecting ESs, while in more resilient areas like Northern Xinjiang, medium GI (GI 0.4–0.6) helps optimize the benefits of ESs. The findings provide scientific support for grazing management strategies in Xinjiang's arid grasslands and offer theoretical guidance for the sustainable use of grassland resources in arid regions globally.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54269,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Development","volume":"57 ","pages":"Article 101333"},"PeriodicalIF":5.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of grazing intensity on ecosystem services in arid grasslands and implications for management\",\"authors\":\"Mengqi Yuan , Fang Han\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envdev.2025.101333\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Arid grassland ecosystems play a crucial role in maintaining regional ecological balance and supporting pastoral production. However, overgrazing and climate change have led to the degradation of ecosystem services (ESs). Understanding the complex relationship between grazing intensity (GI) and ESs is essential for achieving sustainable management of grassland ecosystems. This study focuses on the arid grasslands of Xinjiang, China, using dual-scale analysis (grid and county levels), and integrates multi-source data and models such as the Geodetector to evaluate the spatiotemporal dynamics of GI on ecosystem service capacity (ESCL) and synergy level (ESSL) from 2000 to 2020. Results show significant synergy among ESs, with GI playing a key interactive role in influencing them. Both ESCL and ESSL exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship with GI: at low GI (GI < 0.4), ESCL and ESSL demonstrate synergy, but when GI exceeds 0.6, a trade-off emerges. The impact of different grazing intensities on ESCL and ESSL varies significantly across spatial clusters, with medium grazing levels generally sustaining the sustainability of grassland ecosystems. In fragile regions like Southern Xinjiang, maintaining low GI is crucial for protecting ESs, while in more resilient areas like Northern Xinjiang, medium GI (GI 0.4–0.6) helps optimize the benefits of ESs. The findings provide scientific support for grazing management strategies in Xinjiang's arid grasslands and offer theoretical guidance for the sustainable use of grassland resources in arid regions globally.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Development\",\"volume\":\"57 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101333\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452500199X\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Development","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S221146452500199X","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Effects of grazing intensity on ecosystem services in arid grasslands and implications for management
Arid grassland ecosystems play a crucial role in maintaining regional ecological balance and supporting pastoral production. However, overgrazing and climate change have led to the degradation of ecosystem services (ESs). Understanding the complex relationship between grazing intensity (GI) and ESs is essential for achieving sustainable management of grassland ecosystems. This study focuses on the arid grasslands of Xinjiang, China, using dual-scale analysis (grid and county levels), and integrates multi-source data and models such as the Geodetector to evaluate the spatiotemporal dynamics of GI on ecosystem service capacity (ESCL) and synergy level (ESSL) from 2000 to 2020. Results show significant synergy among ESs, with GI playing a key interactive role in influencing them. Both ESCL and ESSL exhibit an inverted U-shaped relationship with GI: at low GI (GI < 0.4), ESCL and ESSL demonstrate synergy, but when GI exceeds 0.6, a trade-off emerges. The impact of different grazing intensities on ESCL and ESSL varies significantly across spatial clusters, with medium grazing levels generally sustaining the sustainability of grassland ecosystems. In fragile regions like Southern Xinjiang, maintaining low GI is crucial for protecting ESs, while in more resilient areas like Northern Xinjiang, medium GI (GI 0.4–0.6) helps optimize the benefits of ESs. The findings provide scientific support for grazing management strategies in Xinjiang's arid grasslands and offer theoretical guidance for the sustainable use of grassland resources in arid regions globally.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Development provides a future oriented, pro-active, authoritative source of information and learning for researchers, postgraduate students, policymakers, and managers, and bridges the gap between fundamental research and the application in management and policy practices. It stimulates the exchange and coupling of traditional scientific knowledge on the environment, with the experiential knowledge among decision makers and other stakeholders and also connects natural sciences and social and behavioral sciences. Environmental Development includes and promotes scientific work from the non-western world, and also strengthens the collaboration between the developed and developing world. Further it links environmental research to broader issues of economic and social-cultural developments, and is intended to shorten the delays between research and publication, while ensuring thorough peer review. Environmental Development also creates a forum for transnational communication, discussion and global action.
Environmental Development is open to a broad range of disciplines and authors. The journal welcomes, in particular, contributions from a younger generation of researchers, and papers expanding the frontiers of environmental sciences, pointing at new directions and innovative answers.
All submissions to Environmental Development are reviewed using the general criteria of quality, originality, precision, importance of topic and insights, clarity of exposition, which are in keeping with the journal''s aims and scope.