在欧空局保护的25年里,太平洋鲑鱼的丰度趋势

IF 6.1 1区 农林科学 Q1 FISHERIES
Michael J. Ford, Steven T. Lindley, Katie A. Barnas, Andrew O. Shelton, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Damon M. Holzer, David A. Boughton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, James M. Myers, Chris E. Jordan, Heidi Fish, Martin Liermann, Michael R. O'Farrell, Nathan J. Mantua, Rachel C. Johnson, William H. Satterthwaite, Thomas H. Williams
{"title":"在欧空局保护的25年里,太平洋鲑鱼的丰度趋势","authors":"Michael J. Ford, Steven T. Lindley, Katie A. Barnas, Andrew O. Shelton, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Damon M. Holzer, David A. Boughton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, James M. Myers, Chris E. Jordan, Heidi Fish, Martin Liermann, Michael R. O'Farrell, Nathan J. Mantua, Rachel C. Johnson, William H. Satterthwaite, Thomas H. Williams","doi":"10.1111/faf.70019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon (<jats:italic>Oncorhynchus</jats:italic> spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. tshawytscha</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ), chum salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. keta</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and sockeye salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. nerka</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) had higher median trends than coho salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. kisutch</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and steelhead (anadromous <jats:styled-content style=\"fixed-case\"><jats:italic>O. mykiss</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.","PeriodicalId":169,"journal":{"name":"Fish and Fisheries","volume":"60 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of ESA Protection\",\"authors\":\"Michael J. Ford, Steven T. Lindley, Katie A. Barnas, Andrew O. Shelton, Brian C. Spence, Laurie A. Weitkamp, Damon M. Holzer, David A. Boughton, Elizabeth E. Holmes, James M. Myers, Chris E. Jordan, Heidi Fish, Martin Liermann, Michael R. O'Farrell, Nathan J. Mantua, Rachel C. Johnson, William H. Satterthwaite, Thomas H. Williams\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/faf.70019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon (<jats:italic>Oncorhynchus</jats:italic> spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>O. tshawytscha</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ), chum salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>O. keta</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and sockeye salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>O. nerka</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) had higher median trends than coho salmon (<jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>O. kisutch</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ) and steelhead (anadromous <jats:styled-content style=\\\"fixed-case\\\"><jats:italic>O. mykiss</jats:italic></jats:styled-content> ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":169,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fish and Fisheries\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70019\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FISHERIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fish and Fisheries","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.70019","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FISHERIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

1989年至2007年间,在加利福尼亚和太平洋西北部(俄勒冈州,华盛顿州,爱达荷州)的河流中产卵的太平洋鲑鱼(Oncorhynchus spp.)的28个不同种群(DPS)被列入(保护)美国濒危物种法案(ESA)。从那时起的大约25年里,为恢复这些种群作出了相当大的努力,但没有一个DPS增加到足以被除名的程度。我们评估了列入ESA的太平洋鲑鱼DPS以及未列入ESA的DPS的丰度趋势。我们的目标是评估受保护的DPS在保护期间(在我们的研究中名义上是1995-2020年)是否增加了丰度,无论是绝对数量还是相对于未受保护的DPS。在此期间,大多数受保护的DPS种群的丰度呈增加趋势,受保护种群的中位数趋势高于同一物种的非受保护种群。从地理上看,太平洋西北部的人口比加州的人口有更高的中位数趋势。在受保护种群中,奇努克鲑鱼(O. tshawytscha)、鲑鱼(O. keta)和红鲑鱼(O. nerka)的中位数趋势高于蓝鲑(O. kisutch)和钢头鲑(O. mykiss)。对于大多数DPS(已列入名单和未列入名单),同一时期收获率和孵化场放放量的趋势相对稳定,而与淡水和海洋气候有关的指标的趋势总体上对鲑鱼不利。我们的研究结果表明,鲑鱼恢复行动可能有助于稳定和增加受保护的DPS,但大多数仍远低于恢复目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Abundance Trends of Pacific Salmon During a Quarter Century of ESA Protection
Between 1989 and 2007, 28 Distinct Population Segments (DPS) of Pacific salmon (Oncorhynchus spp.) spawning in rivers in California and the Pacific Northwest (Oregon, Washington, Idaho) were listed (protected) under the US Endangered Species Act (ESA). In the roughly 25 years since then, considerable efforts have been made to recover these populations, but no DPS has increased sufficiently to be delisted. We evaluated abundance trends of ESA‐listed Pacific salmon DPS, along with DPS that were not ESA‐listed. Our goal was to evaluate whether protected DPS increased in abundance during the period of protection (nominally 1995–2020 in our study), either in absolute terms or relative to the unprotected DPS. A majority of the protected DPS had increasing abundance trends over this time period, and protected populations had higher median trends than non‐protected populations of the same species. Geographically, populations in the Pacific Northwest had higher median trends than those in California. Among species of protected populations, Chinook salmon (O. tshawytscha ), chum salmon (O. keta ) and sockeye salmon (O. nerka ) had higher median trends than coho salmon (O. kisutch ) and steelhead (anadromous O. mykiss ). For most DPS (listed and unlisted), trends in harvest rates and hatchery releases were relatively stable during the same time period, whereas trends in indicators related to freshwater and marine climate were generally negative for salmon. Our results suggest that salmon recovery actions may have helped to stabilise and increase protected DPS, but most remain far below their recovery goals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fish and Fisheries
Fish and Fisheries 农林科学-渔业
CiteScore
12.80
自引率
6.00%
发文量
83
期刊介绍: Fish and Fisheries adopts a broad, interdisciplinary approach to the subject of fish biology and fisheries. It draws contributions in the form of major synoptic papers and syntheses or meta-analyses that lay out new approaches, re-examine existing findings, methods or theory, and discuss papers and commentaries from diverse areas. Focal areas include fish palaeontology, molecular biology and ecology, genetics, biochemistry, physiology, ecology, behaviour, evolutionary studies, conservation, assessment, population dynamics, mathematical modelling, ecosystem analysis and the social, economic and policy aspects of fisheries where they are grounded in a scientific approach. A paper in Fish and Fisheries must draw upon all key elements of the existing literature on a topic, normally have a broad geographic and/or taxonomic scope, and provide general points which make it compelling to a wide range of readers whatever their geographical location. So, in short, we aim to publish articles that make syntheses of old or synoptic, long-term or spatially widespread data, introduce or consolidate fresh concepts or theory, or, in the Ghoti section, briefly justify preliminary, new synoptic ideas. Please note that authors of submissions not meeting this mandate will be directed to the appropriate primary literature.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信