上肢共济失调的数字结果捕获有意义的纵向变化和治疗反应

IF 7.6 1区 医学 Q1 CLINICAL NEUROLOGY
Dominik Hermle, Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Ralf Reilmann, Matthis Synofzik, Andreas Traschütz
{"title":"上肢共济失调的数字结果捕获有意义的纵向变化和治疗反应","authors":"Dominik Hermle, Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Ralf Reilmann, Matthis Synofzik, Andreas Traschütz","doi":"10.1002/mds.70012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDigital‐motor outcomes promise better responsiveness than clinician‐reported outcomes in ataxia trials. However, their patient meaningfulness and sensitivity to change remain to be demonstrated, particularly in the upper limb domain.ObjectivesValidation of quantitative motor (Q‐Motor) assessment for upper limb ataxia against patient‐reported outcomes and regarding sensitivity to both longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, the latter in n‐of‐1 treatment settings.MethodsSingle‐center longitudinal assessment of finger tapping, diadochokinesia, grip‐lift, spiral drawing, and target reaching in (1) 36 cross‐genotype ataxia patients and 20 controls, validating digital measures for correlations with patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM)‐ataxia, 2‐weeks test–retest reliability, and sensitivity to change within a trial‐relevant 1‐year follow‐up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI‐C); and (2) two patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 27B (SCA27B) on versus off treatment with 4‐aminopyridine.ResultsTwenty‐four digital measures correlated with the PROM‐ataxia upper‐limb composite (|ρ| = 0.4–0.7) and had excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91–0.99). Correlations to individual PROM‐ataxia items were specific for functional impairment the respective measure was hypothesized to capture. Speed of finger tapping and diadochokinesia, and smoothness of target reaching (spectral arc length of movement in three dimensions [SPARC<jats:sub>3D</jats:sub>]) captured 1‐year progression in ataxia patients (|<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sub>prb</jats:sub>| = 0.38–0.51), and specifically in patients with worsening PGI‐C. Estimated sample sizes to detect longitudinal change were lower for digital than clinical outcomes (SPARC<jats:sub>3D</jats:sub>: n = 33, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): n = 79, nine‐hole peg‐test: n = 214). Speed of diadochokinesia, stability of grip‐lift, and variability of target reaching captured treatment responses to 4‐aminopyridine in SCA27B, exceeding minimal detectable and minimal important change.ConclusionDigital upper limb measures capture patient‐meaningful 1‐year longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, and are therefore promising outcomes for upcoming ataxia trials. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.","PeriodicalId":213,"journal":{"name":"Movement Disorders","volume":"84 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":7.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digital Outcomes of Upper Limb Ataxia Capture Meaningful Longitudinal Change and Treatment Response\",\"authors\":\"Dominik Hermle, Robin Schubert, Pascal Barallon, Winfried Ilg, Rebecca Schüle, Ralf Reilmann, Matthis Synofzik, Andreas Traschütz\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/mds.70012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundDigital‐motor outcomes promise better responsiveness than clinician‐reported outcomes in ataxia trials. However, their patient meaningfulness and sensitivity to change remain to be demonstrated, particularly in the upper limb domain.ObjectivesValidation of quantitative motor (Q‐Motor) assessment for upper limb ataxia against patient‐reported outcomes and regarding sensitivity to both longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, the latter in n‐of‐1 treatment settings.MethodsSingle‐center longitudinal assessment of finger tapping, diadochokinesia, grip‐lift, spiral drawing, and target reaching in (1) 36 cross‐genotype ataxia patients and 20 controls, validating digital measures for correlations with patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM)‐ataxia, 2‐weeks test–retest reliability, and sensitivity to change within a trial‐relevant 1‐year follow‐up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI‐C); and (2) two patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 27B (SCA27B) on versus off treatment with 4‐aminopyridine.ResultsTwenty‐four digital measures correlated with the PROM‐ataxia upper‐limb composite (|ρ| = 0.4–0.7) and had excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91–0.99). Correlations to individual PROM‐ataxia items were specific for functional impairment the respective measure was hypothesized to capture. Speed of finger tapping and diadochokinesia, and smoothness of target reaching (spectral arc length of movement in three dimensions [SPARC<jats:sub>3D</jats:sub>]) captured 1‐year progression in ataxia patients (|<jats:italic>r</jats:italic><jats:sub>prb</jats:sub>| = 0.38–0.51), and specifically in patients with worsening PGI‐C. Estimated sample sizes to detect longitudinal change were lower for digital than clinical outcomes (SPARC<jats:sub>3D</jats:sub>: n = 33, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): n = 79, nine‐hole peg‐test: n = 214). Speed of diadochokinesia, stability of grip‐lift, and variability of target reaching captured treatment responses to 4‐aminopyridine in SCA27B, exceeding minimal detectable and minimal important change.ConclusionDigital upper limb measures capture patient‐meaningful 1‐year longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, and are therefore promising outcomes for upcoming ataxia trials. © 2025 The Author(s). <jats:italic>Movement Disorders</jats:italic> published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.\",\"PeriodicalId\":213,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"volume\":\"84 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":7.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Movement Disorders\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70012\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Movement Disorders","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/mds.70012","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CLINICAL NEUROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在共济失调试验中,数字运动结果比临床医生报告的结果承诺更好的反应性。然而,他们的耐心意义和对变化的敏感性仍有待证明,特别是在上肢领域。目的:验证定量运动(Q - motor)评估上肢失调患者报告的结果,以及对纵向和治疗诱导变化的敏感性,后者在n - of - 1治疗环境中。方法单中心纵向评估36例跨基因型共济失调患者和20例对照者的手指叩击、运动失调、握力提升、螺旋拉伸和目标到达,验证数字测量与患者报告的结果测量(PROM) -共济失调的相关性,2周测试-再测试的可靠性,以及在与试验相关的1年随访中对变化的敏感性,锚定在患者总体变化印象(PGI - C)中;(2) 2例脊髓小脑性共济失调27B型(SCA27B)患者接受4 -氨基吡啶治疗。结果24项数字指标与PROM - ataxia上肢复合指标相关(|ρ| = 0.4 ~ 0.7),且具有良好的重测信度(ICC = 0.91 ~ 0.99)。与单个PROM -共济失调项目的相关性是特定于功能损伤的,假设各自的测量方法可以捕获。在失调患者(|rprb| = 0.38-0.51)中,特别是在PGI - C恶化的患者中,手指敲击和运动障碍的速度以及达到目标的平稳性(三维运动的谱弧长度[SPARC3D])捕获了1年的进展。用于检测纵向变化的估计样本量在数字结果中低于临床结果(SPARC3D: n = 33,共济失调评估和评定量表(SARA): n = 79,九孔钉测试:n = 214)。在SCA27B中,4 -氨基吡啶的释放速度、握力提升稳定性和目标达到捕获治疗反应的可变性超过最小可检测和最小重要变化。结论:数字上肢测量捕获了患者有意义的1年纵向变化和治疗引起的变化,因此在即将进行的共济失调试验中是有希望的结果。©2025作者。Wiley期刊有限责任公司代表国际帕金森和运动障碍学会出版的《运动障碍》。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digital Outcomes of Upper Limb Ataxia Capture Meaningful Longitudinal Change and Treatment Response
BackgroundDigital‐motor outcomes promise better responsiveness than clinician‐reported outcomes in ataxia trials. However, their patient meaningfulness and sensitivity to change remain to be demonstrated, particularly in the upper limb domain.ObjectivesValidation of quantitative motor (Q‐Motor) assessment for upper limb ataxia against patient‐reported outcomes and regarding sensitivity to both longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, the latter in n‐of‐1 treatment settings.MethodsSingle‐center longitudinal assessment of finger tapping, diadochokinesia, grip‐lift, spiral drawing, and target reaching in (1) 36 cross‐genotype ataxia patients and 20 controls, validating digital measures for correlations with patient‐reported outcome measure (PROM)‐ataxia, 2‐weeks test–retest reliability, and sensitivity to change within a trial‐relevant 1‐year follow‐up, anchored in Patient Global Impression of Change (PGI‐C); and (2) two patients with spinocerebellar ataxia type 27B (SCA27B) on versus off treatment with 4‐aminopyridine.ResultsTwenty‐four digital measures correlated with the PROM‐ataxia upper‐limb composite (|ρ| = 0.4–0.7) and had excellent test–retest reliability (ICC = 0.91–0.99). Correlations to individual PROM‐ataxia items were specific for functional impairment the respective measure was hypothesized to capture. Speed of finger tapping and diadochokinesia, and smoothness of target reaching (spectral arc length of movement in three dimensions [SPARC3D]) captured 1‐year progression in ataxia patients (|rprb| = 0.38–0.51), and specifically in patients with worsening PGI‐C. Estimated sample sizes to detect longitudinal change were lower for digital than clinical outcomes (SPARC3D: n = 33, Scale for the Assessment and Rating of Ataxia (SARA): n = 79, nine‐hole peg‐test: n = 214). Speed of diadochokinesia, stability of grip‐lift, and variability of target reaching captured treatment responses to 4‐aminopyridine in SCA27B, exceeding minimal detectable and minimal important change.ConclusionDigital upper limb measures capture patient‐meaningful 1‐year longitudinal and treatment‐induced change, and are therefore promising outcomes for upcoming ataxia trials. © 2025 The Author(s). Movement Disorders published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of International Parkinson and Movement Disorder Society.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Movement Disorders
Movement Disorders 医学-临床神经学
CiteScore
13.30
自引率
8.10%
发文量
371
审稿时长
12 months
期刊介绍: Movement Disorders publishes a variety of content types including Reviews, Viewpoints, Full Length Articles, Historical Reports, Brief Reports, and Letters. The journal considers original manuscripts on topics related to the diagnosis, therapeutics, pharmacology, biochemistry, physiology, etiology, genetics, and epidemiology of movement disorders. Appropriate topics include Parkinsonism, Chorea, Tremors, Dystonia, Myoclonus, Tics, Tardive Dyskinesia, Spasticity, and Ataxia.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信