亚洲有色人种化脓性汗腺炎的研究现状

IF 0.5
Anju George
{"title":"亚洲有色人种化脓性汗腺炎的研究现状","authors":"Anju George","doi":"10.1002/jvc2.70065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The article by Prieto et al. [<span>1</span>] was an interesting read and brings attention to the disproportionate burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) among patients with skin of colour (SOC), particularly African American and Hispanic populations. However, a significant underrepresentation of Asian population has been noted throughout the review. While the article highlights limited data on Asian populations, a PubMed and Google Scholar search reveals several regional studies from various parts of Asia that contribute valuable insights into the epidemiology and clinical presentation of HS. Though the article [<span>1</span>] appropriately frames HS within the context of skin of colour, it is important to recognise that SOC is not a homogenous category. Asia is a highly heterogeneous region comprising numerous racial and ethnic groups, with the period prevalence of HS reported to be 0.06% [<span>2</span>]. Asian populations—encompassing East Asia (e.g., China, Korea, Japan), Southeast Asia (e.g., Singapore, Malaysia), and South Asia (e.g., India, Pakistan, Bangladesh)—span a broad spectrum of Fitzpatrick skin types (III to VI), each with distinct epidemiological and disease patterns. Central (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan) and Western Asia (Saudi Arabia, UAE) differ in skin phenotype (Fitzpatrick 2–4) and ethnic composition compared to the rest of Asia.</p><p>Among the Southeast Asian cohorts from Singapore and Malaysia, Indian patients appear disproportionately affected by HS while Chinese patients are underrepresented relative to national census data [<span>2</span>]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 30,125 patients from East and Southeast Asia highlights distinct demographic and clinical patterns, revealing a male predominance (66%), lesion distribution favoring the axilla and gluteal area, and a notably low rate of familial HS (5%) compared to Western cohorts (30%). The male predominance in Asian HS populations has been attributed, in part, to significantly higher smoking rates among Asian men, in contrast to Western cohorts where smoking prevalence is balanced between males and females [<span>3</span>]. Lesional distribution in HS shows some overlap between East Asia and Western countries, though the commonly involved sites differ. In East Asian cohorts like Korea and Japan, gluteal involvement is more common especially among males, whereas axillary involvement dominates among females. In contrast, Southeast Asian studies from Singapore and Malaysia consistently report the axilla as the most affected site, possibly due to climatic factors like higher humidity and sweat-induced follicular occlusion [<span>2</span>]. Only around 5% of Asian HS patients report a positive family history, compared to approximately 30% in Western populations—a difference that may be influenced by rising obesity rates in Asia unmasking sporadic cases, and the predominance of Caucasian participants in Western studies, where familial HS is more common. Interestingly, although monogenic HS is rare overall, mutations in the γ-secretase pathway have been more frequently identified in Asian patients, pointing to a distinct genetic profile that merits further exploration. There is a clear paucity of published data representing South Asian countries such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan, limiting our understanding of HS epidemiology and clinical patterns in these diverse and densely populated regions. Again, Asian cohorts, particularly from South Asia, remain underrepresented in HS research and clinical trials—a gap noted in recent reviews emphasising the need for more inclusive and regionally representative studies [<span>3</span>]. Table 1 provides a geographic depiction of phenotypic, epidemiological, and genetic features of HS across different parts of Asia in comparison to the Western population (a few prototypic examples of countries within each region are provided in parentheses). These findings highlight phenotypic heterogeneity in HS and underscore the importance of incorporating Asian data into future research, guidelines and treatment paradigms.</p><p><b>Anju George:</b> conceptualisation, literature review, manuscript drafting and editing. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The author has nothing to report.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>","PeriodicalId":94325,"journal":{"name":"JEADV clinical practice","volume":"4 4","pages":"902-904"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.70065","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Understudied Landscape of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Asian Skin of Colour Populations\",\"authors\":\"Anju George\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jvc2.70065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The article by Prieto et al. [<span>1</span>] was an interesting read and brings attention to the disproportionate burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) among patients with skin of colour (SOC), particularly African American and Hispanic populations. However, a significant underrepresentation of Asian population has been noted throughout the review. While the article highlights limited data on Asian populations, a PubMed and Google Scholar search reveals several regional studies from various parts of Asia that contribute valuable insights into the epidemiology and clinical presentation of HS. Though the article [<span>1</span>] appropriately frames HS within the context of skin of colour, it is important to recognise that SOC is not a homogenous category. Asia is a highly heterogeneous region comprising numerous racial and ethnic groups, with the period prevalence of HS reported to be 0.06% [<span>2</span>]. Asian populations—encompassing East Asia (e.g., China, Korea, Japan), Southeast Asia (e.g., Singapore, Malaysia), and South Asia (e.g., India, Pakistan, Bangladesh)—span a broad spectrum of Fitzpatrick skin types (III to VI), each with distinct epidemiological and disease patterns. Central (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan) and Western Asia (Saudi Arabia, UAE) differ in skin phenotype (Fitzpatrick 2–4) and ethnic composition compared to the rest of Asia.</p><p>Among the Southeast Asian cohorts from Singapore and Malaysia, Indian patients appear disproportionately affected by HS while Chinese patients are underrepresented relative to national census data [<span>2</span>]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 30,125 patients from East and Southeast Asia highlights distinct demographic and clinical patterns, revealing a male predominance (66%), lesion distribution favoring the axilla and gluteal area, and a notably low rate of familial HS (5%) compared to Western cohorts (30%). The male predominance in Asian HS populations has been attributed, in part, to significantly higher smoking rates among Asian men, in contrast to Western cohorts where smoking prevalence is balanced between males and females [<span>3</span>]. Lesional distribution in HS shows some overlap between East Asia and Western countries, though the commonly involved sites differ. In East Asian cohorts like Korea and Japan, gluteal involvement is more common especially among males, whereas axillary involvement dominates among females. In contrast, Southeast Asian studies from Singapore and Malaysia consistently report the axilla as the most affected site, possibly due to climatic factors like higher humidity and sweat-induced follicular occlusion [<span>2</span>]. Only around 5% of Asian HS patients report a positive family history, compared to approximately 30% in Western populations—a difference that may be influenced by rising obesity rates in Asia unmasking sporadic cases, and the predominance of Caucasian participants in Western studies, where familial HS is more common. Interestingly, although monogenic HS is rare overall, mutations in the γ-secretase pathway have been more frequently identified in Asian patients, pointing to a distinct genetic profile that merits further exploration. There is a clear paucity of published data representing South Asian countries such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan, limiting our understanding of HS epidemiology and clinical patterns in these diverse and densely populated regions. Again, Asian cohorts, particularly from South Asia, remain underrepresented in HS research and clinical trials—a gap noted in recent reviews emphasising the need for more inclusive and regionally representative studies [<span>3</span>]. Table 1 provides a geographic depiction of phenotypic, epidemiological, and genetic features of HS across different parts of Asia in comparison to the Western population (a few prototypic examples of countries within each region are provided in parentheses). These findings highlight phenotypic heterogeneity in HS and underscore the importance of incorporating Asian data into future research, guidelines and treatment paradigms.</p><p><b>Anju George:</b> conceptualisation, literature review, manuscript drafting and editing. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.</p><p>The author has nothing to report.</p><p>The author declares no conflicts of interest.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":94325,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JEADV clinical practice\",\"volume\":\"4 4\",\"pages\":\"902-904\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/jvc2.70065\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JEADV clinical practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.70065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JEADV clinical practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/jvc2.70065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Prieto等人的文章是一篇有趣的文章,它引起了人们对有色皮肤(SOC)患者,特别是非洲裔美国人和西班牙裔人群中化脓性汗液炎(HS)不成比例负担的关注。然而,在整个审查过程中,亚洲人口的代表性明显不足。虽然这篇文章强调了亚洲人口的有限数据,但PubMed和谷歌Scholar的搜索显示,来自亚洲不同地区的几项区域研究为HS的流行病学和临床表现提供了有价值的见解。虽然文章[1]适当地在有色皮肤的背景下构建HS,但重要的是要认识到SOC不是一个同质的类别。亚洲是一个高度异质的地区,包括许多种族和民族群体,据报道,HS的时期患病率为0.06%。亚洲人口——包括东亚(如中国、韩国、日本)、东南亚(如新加坡、马来西亚)和南亚(如印度、巴基斯坦、孟加拉国)——跨越了广泛的菲茨帕特里克皮肤类型(III至VI),每种皮肤类型都有不同的流行病学和疾病模式。中亚(哈萨克斯坦、乌兹别克斯坦、土库曼斯坦)和西亚(沙特阿拉伯、阿联酋)与亚洲其他地区相比,在皮肤表型(Fitzpatrick 2-4)和种族构成上存在差异。在来自新加坡和马来西亚的东南亚队列中,印度患者似乎不成比例地受到HS的影响,而与全国人口普查数据相比,中国患者的代表性不足。最近对东亚和东南亚30125例患者的系统回顾和荟萃分析强调了不同的人口统计学和临床模式,揭示了男性优势(66%),病变分布倾向于腋窝和臀区,与西方队列(30%)相比,家族性HS的发生率(5%)明显较低。亚洲HS人群中男性的优势部分归因于亚洲男性的吸烟率明显较高,而西方人群的吸烟率在男性和女性之间是平衡的。性病变分布在东亚和西方国家有一些重叠,尽管通常涉及的部位不同。在像韩国和日本这样的东亚人群中,臀部受累更常见,尤其是在男性中,而腋窝受累则在女性中占主导地位。相比之下,来自新加坡和马来西亚的东南亚研究一致报告腋窝是受影响最大的部位,可能是由于气候因素,如较高的湿度和汗水引起的卵泡闭塞[2]。只有大约5%的亚洲HS患者报告有阳性的家族史,而在西方人群中这一比例约为30%——这一差异可能受到亚洲肥胖率上升的影响,这揭示了散发病例,而在西方研究中,家族性HS更为常见,白人参与者占主导地位。有趣的是,虽然单基因HS总体上是罕见的,但γ分泌酶途径的突变在亚洲患者中更为常见,这表明一种独特的基因谱值得进一步探索。印度、孟加拉国、尼泊尔和巴基斯坦等南亚国家的公开数据明显缺乏,这限制了我们对这些多样化和人口稠密地区的HS流行病学和临床模式的理解。同样,亚洲人群,特别是来自南亚的人群在HS研究和临床试验中的代表性仍然不足——最近的综述强调需要更具包容性和区域代表性的研究,并指出了这一差距[10]。表1提供了亚洲不同地区HS的表型、流行病学和遗传特征的地理描述,并与西方人口进行了比较(括号内提供了每个地区国家的一些原型示例)。这些发现强调了HS的表型异质性,并强调了将亚洲数据纳入未来研究、指南和治疗范例的重要性。Anju George:概念化,文献综述,手稿起草和编辑。作者已阅读并批准了定稿。作者没有什么可报道的。作者声明无利益冲突。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Understudied Landscape of Hidradenitis Suppurativa in Asian Skin of Colour Populations

The article by Prieto et al. [1] was an interesting read and brings attention to the disproportionate burden of hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) among patients with skin of colour (SOC), particularly African American and Hispanic populations. However, a significant underrepresentation of Asian population has been noted throughout the review. While the article highlights limited data on Asian populations, a PubMed and Google Scholar search reveals several regional studies from various parts of Asia that contribute valuable insights into the epidemiology and clinical presentation of HS. Though the article [1] appropriately frames HS within the context of skin of colour, it is important to recognise that SOC is not a homogenous category. Asia is a highly heterogeneous region comprising numerous racial and ethnic groups, with the period prevalence of HS reported to be 0.06% [2]. Asian populations—encompassing East Asia (e.g., China, Korea, Japan), Southeast Asia (e.g., Singapore, Malaysia), and South Asia (e.g., India, Pakistan, Bangladesh)—span a broad spectrum of Fitzpatrick skin types (III to VI), each with distinct epidemiological and disease patterns. Central (Kazakhstan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan) and Western Asia (Saudi Arabia, UAE) differ in skin phenotype (Fitzpatrick 2–4) and ethnic composition compared to the rest of Asia.

Among the Southeast Asian cohorts from Singapore and Malaysia, Indian patients appear disproportionately affected by HS while Chinese patients are underrepresented relative to national census data [2]. A recent systematic review and meta-analysis of 30,125 patients from East and Southeast Asia highlights distinct demographic and clinical patterns, revealing a male predominance (66%), lesion distribution favoring the axilla and gluteal area, and a notably low rate of familial HS (5%) compared to Western cohorts (30%). The male predominance in Asian HS populations has been attributed, in part, to significantly higher smoking rates among Asian men, in contrast to Western cohorts where smoking prevalence is balanced between males and females [3]. Lesional distribution in HS shows some overlap between East Asia and Western countries, though the commonly involved sites differ. In East Asian cohorts like Korea and Japan, gluteal involvement is more common especially among males, whereas axillary involvement dominates among females. In contrast, Southeast Asian studies from Singapore and Malaysia consistently report the axilla as the most affected site, possibly due to climatic factors like higher humidity and sweat-induced follicular occlusion [2]. Only around 5% of Asian HS patients report a positive family history, compared to approximately 30% in Western populations—a difference that may be influenced by rising obesity rates in Asia unmasking sporadic cases, and the predominance of Caucasian participants in Western studies, where familial HS is more common. Interestingly, although monogenic HS is rare overall, mutations in the γ-secretase pathway have been more frequently identified in Asian patients, pointing to a distinct genetic profile that merits further exploration. There is a clear paucity of published data representing South Asian countries such as India, Bangladesh, Nepal, and Pakistan, limiting our understanding of HS epidemiology and clinical patterns in these diverse and densely populated regions. Again, Asian cohorts, particularly from South Asia, remain underrepresented in HS research and clinical trials—a gap noted in recent reviews emphasising the need for more inclusive and regionally representative studies [3]. Table 1 provides a geographic depiction of phenotypic, epidemiological, and genetic features of HS across different parts of Asia in comparison to the Western population (a few prototypic examples of countries within each region are provided in parentheses). These findings highlight phenotypic heterogeneity in HS and underscore the importance of incorporating Asian data into future research, guidelines and treatment paradigms.

Anju George: conceptualisation, literature review, manuscript drafting and editing. The author has read and approved the final manuscript.

The author has nothing to report.

The author declares no conflicts of interest.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信