基于led的混合漫反射光谱法测定SPF和UVA-PF的盲法多中心研究(ALT-SPF)

IF 2.5 4区 医学 Q2 DERMATOLOGY
Carina Reble, Michael Bayer, Bertrand Colson, Tanja Emmler, Jean-Claude Hubaud, Matthias Seise, Eva Perroux-David, Georg Wiora, Daniela F. Zamudio Diaz, ALT-SPF Consortium, Martina C. Meinke, Stephan Bielfeldt
{"title":"基于led的混合漫反射光谱法测定SPF和UVA-PF的盲法多中心研究(ALT-SPF)","authors":"Carina Reble,&nbsp;Michael Bayer,&nbsp;Bertrand Colson,&nbsp;Tanja Emmler,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Hubaud,&nbsp;Matthias Seise,&nbsp;Eva Perroux-David,&nbsp;Georg Wiora,&nbsp;Daniela F. Zamudio Diaz,&nbsp;ALT-SPF Consortium,&nbsp;Martina C. Meinke,&nbsp;Stephan Bielfeldt","doi":"10.1111/ics.70007","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>The consortium ALT-SPF performed an international round robin test to characterize non-invasive methods as alternatives to the erythema-based testing of sun protection factor (SPF) according to ISO 24444:2019.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) based on a multi-lambda LED light source uses in vivo reflectance spectra on skin to determine sunscreens in vivo absorbance spectra, which are fused with respective in vitro absorbance spectra measured as thin films transmission as described in ISO 24443:2019. As a part of the ALT-SPF consortium initiative, a blinded study on 64 samples was performed in four European laboratories. After further improvements of the method, a blinded re-evaluation based on 16 samples was performed. Five statistical acceptance criteria for new methods were assessed by an independent statistical institute to compare the obtained results to the reference methods for SPF and UVA-PF.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>The initial ALT-SPF study 1 showed that the bias criterion was acceptable, while the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability needed further improvement. The re-evaluation study 2 showed that the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability could be considerably improved. Using only <i>n</i> = 10 volunteers and a bias correction based on the initial ALT-SPF study 1 data, the SPF results of the re-evaluation study 2 were close to the acceptance criteria of the ALT-SPF study with criterion 1 (reproducibility) and only 11% over the limit defined by the performance of the gold standard. The UVA-PF results were within the acceptance limits for the acceptance criteria, except criterion 3 being in the ‘almost met’ range. The re-evaluation study indicates that the method has a comparable precision to the gold standard methods ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>This study showed that the LED-HDRS method is capable of providing reasonable non-invasive SPF and UVA-PF results and that the performance shows close alignment to the reference method. Thus, it can be proposed as an alternative method to the current standards ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13936,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Cosmetic Science","volume":"47 S1","pages":"96-114"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ics.70007","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Characterization of LED-based hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy method for determination of SPF and UVA-PF in blinded multi-centre study (ALT-SPF)\",\"authors\":\"Carina Reble,&nbsp;Michael Bayer,&nbsp;Bertrand Colson,&nbsp;Tanja Emmler,&nbsp;Jean-Claude Hubaud,&nbsp;Matthias Seise,&nbsp;Eva Perroux-David,&nbsp;Georg Wiora,&nbsp;Daniela F. Zamudio Diaz,&nbsp;ALT-SPF Consortium,&nbsp;Martina C. Meinke,&nbsp;Stephan Bielfeldt\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/ics.70007\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>The consortium ALT-SPF performed an international round robin test to characterize non-invasive methods as alternatives to the erythema-based testing of sun protection factor (SPF) according to ISO 24444:2019.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) based on a multi-lambda LED light source uses in vivo reflectance spectra on skin to determine sunscreens in vivo absorbance spectra, which are fused with respective in vitro absorbance spectra measured as thin films transmission as described in ISO 24443:2019. As a part of the ALT-SPF consortium initiative, a blinded study on 64 samples was performed in four European laboratories. After further improvements of the method, a blinded re-evaluation based on 16 samples was performed. Five statistical acceptance criteria for new methods were assessed by an independent statistical institute to compare the obtained results to the reference methods for SPF and UVA-PF.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>The initial ALT-SPF study 1 showed that the bias criterion was acceptable, while the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability needed further improvement. The re-evaluation study 2 showed that the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability could be considerably improved. Using only <i>n</i> = 10 volunteers and a bias correction based on the initial ALT-SPF study 1 data, the SPF results of the re-evaluation study 2 were close to the acceptance criteria of the ALT-SPF study with criterion 1 (reproducibility) and only 11% over the limit defined by the performance of the gold standard. The UVA-PF results were within the acceptance limits for the acceptance criteria, except criterion 3 being in the ‘almost met’ range. The re-evaluation study indicates that the method has a comparable precision to the gold standard methods ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study showed that the LED-HDRS method is capable of providing reasonable non-invasive SPF and UVA-PF results and that the performance shows close alignment to the reference method. Thus, it can be proposed as an alternative method to the current standards ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Cosmetic Science\",\"volume\":\"47 S1\",\"pages\":\"96-114\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/ics.70007\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Cosmetic Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ics.70007\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DERMATOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Cosmetic Science","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/ics.70007","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DERMATOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的ALT-SPF联盟根据ISO 24444:2019进行了一项国际循环试验,以表征非侵入性方法作为基于红斑的防晒系数(SPF)测试的替代方法。方法基于多λ LED光源的混合漫反射光谱(HDRS)利用皮肤上的体内反射光谱测定防晒霜的体内吸收光谱,并将其与ISO 24443:2019中以薄膜透射方式测量的各自体外吸收光谱融合。作为ALT-SPF联盟倡议的一部分,在四个欧洲实验室对64个样本进行了盲法研究。在进一步改进方法后,对16个样本进行盲法再评价。由独立的统计机构评估新方法的5个统计可接受标准,将所得结果与SPF和UVA-PF的参考方法进行比较。结果初步的ALT-SPF研究1表明,偏倚标准是可以接受的,但重复性和实验室间变异性有待进一步改进。重新评价研究2表明,可重复性和实验室间变异性可显著改善。仅使用n = 10名志愿者,并基于初始ALT-SPF研究1的数据进行偏倚校正,重新评估研究2的SPF结果接近ALT-SPF研究标准1(可重复性)的接受标准,仅超过金标准性能定义的极限11%。UVA-PF结果在接受标准的接受范围内,除了标准3处于“几乎满足”的范围。重新评价研究表明,该方法的精密度与金标准方法ISO 24444和ISO 24443相当。结论本研究表明,LED-HDRS方法能够提供合理的无创SPF和UVA-PF结果,其性能与参考方法接近。因此,它可以作为现行标准ISO 24444和ISO 24443的替代方法提出。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Characterization of LED-based hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy method for determination of SPF and UVA-PF in blinded multi-centre study (ALT-SPF)

Characterization of LED-based hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy method for determination of SPF and UVA-PF in blinded multi-centre study (ALT-SPF)

Objective

The consortium ALT-SPF performed an international round robin test to characterize non-invasive methods as alternatives to the erythema-based testing of sun protection factor (SPF) according to ISO 24444:2019.

Methods

Hybrid diffuse reflectance spectroscopy (HDRS) based on a multi-lambda LED light source uses in vivo reflectance spectra on skin to determine sunscreens in vivo absorbance spectra, which are fused with respective in vitro absorbance spectra measured as thin films transmission as described in ISO 24443:2019. As a part of the ALT-SPF consortium initiative, a blinded study on 64 samples was performed in four European laboratories. After further improvements of the method, a blinded re-evaluation based on 16 samples was performed. Five statistical acceptance criteria for new methods were assessed by an independent statistical institute to compare the obtained results to the reference methods for SPF and UVA-PF.

Results

The initial ALT-SPF study 1 showed that the bias criterion was acceptable, while the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability needed further improvement. The re-evaluation study 2 showed that the reproducibility and interlaboratory variability could be considerably improved. Using only n = 10 volunteers and a bias correction based on the initial ALT-SPF study 1 data, the SPF results of the re-evaluation study 2 were close to the acceptance criteria of the ALT-SPF study with criterion 1 (reproducibility) and only 11% over the limit defined by the performance of the gold standard. The UVA-PF results were within the acceptance limits for the acceptance criteria, except criterion 3 being in the ‘almost met’ range. The re-evaluation study indicates that the method has a comparable precision to the gold standard methods ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.

Conclusion

This study showed that the LED-HDRS method is capable of providing reasonable non-invasive SPF and UVA-PF results and that the performance shows close alignment to the reference method. Thus, it can be proposed as an alternative method to the current standards ISO 24444 and ISO 24443.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
73
期刊介绍: The Journal publishes original refereed papers, review papers and correspondence in the fields of cosmetic research. It is read by practising cosmetic scientists and dermatologists, as well as specialists in more diverse disciplines that are developing new products which contact the skin, hair, nails or mucous membranes. The aim of the Journal is to present current scientific research, both pure and applied, in: cosmetics, toiletries, perfumery and allied fields. Areas that are of particular interest include: studies in skin physiology and interactions with cosmetic ingredients, innovation in claim substantiation methods (in silico, in vitro, ex vivo, in vivo), human and in vitro safety testing of cosmetic ingredients and products, physical chemistry and technology of emulsion and dispersed systems, theory and application of surfactants, new developments in olfactive research, aerosol technology and selected aspects of analytical chemistry.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信