Uğur Dağdeviren, Alparslan Serhat Demir, Caner Erden, Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, Talas Fikret Kurnaz
{"title":"可解释的人工智能,使用集成的机器学习和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)-Borda方法来估计土壤液化的安全系数","authors":"Uğur Dağdeviren, Alparslan Serhat Demir, Caner Erden, Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, Talas Fikret Kurnaz","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N<sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> and a<sub>max</sub> are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable AI using ensemble machine learning with integrated SHapley additive explanations (SHAP)-Borda approach for estimation of the safety factor against soil liquefaction\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Dağdeviren, Alparslan Serhat Demir, Caner Erden, Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, Talas Fikret Kurnaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N<sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> and a<sub>max</sub> are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Explainable AI using ensemble machine learning with integrated SHapley additive explanations (SHAP)-Borda approach for estimation of the safety factor against soil liquefaction
In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N1)60 and amax are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.
期刊介绍:
Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth:
Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices
Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water
Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans
Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards
Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth
Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources
Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials
Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems
Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment
In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.