可解释的人工智能,使用集成的机器学习和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)-Borda方法来估计土壤液化的安全系数

IF 2.8 4区 环境科学与生态学 Q3 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Uğur Dağdeviren, Alparslan Serhat Demir, Caner Erden, Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam, Talas Fikret Kurnaz
{"title":"可解释的人工智能,使用集成的机器学习和SHapley加性解释(SHAP)-Borda方法来估计土壤液化的安全系数","authors":"Uğur Dağdeviren,&nbsp;Alparslan Serhat Demir,&nbsp;Caner Erden,&nbsp;Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam,&nbsp;Talas Fikret Kurnaz","doi":"10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N<sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> and a<sub>max</sub> are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":542,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Earth Sciences","volume":"84 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Explainable AI using ensemble machine learning with integrated SHapley additive explanations (SHAP)-Borda approach for estimation of the safety factor against soil liquefaction\",\"authors\":\"Uğur Dağdeviren,&nbsp;Alparslan Serhat Demir,&nbsp;Caner Erden,&nbsp;Abdullah Hulusi Kökçam,&nbsp;Talas Fikret Kurnaz\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N<sub>1</sub>)<sub>60</sub> and a<sub>max</sub> are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":542,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"volume\":\"84 17\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Earth Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Earth Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12665-025-12466-z","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在大多数基于机器学习(ML)的土壤液化预测研究中,所提出的模型都是在封闭的盒子结构中提出的。在使用可解释性方法分析特征对模型性能影响的研究中,可以看到每种ML算法的特征影响顺序是不同的。这种情况使得在同一主题上进行的研究结果不一致。在本研究中,我们提出了一种集成的SHapley加性解释(SHAP)-Borda方法来克服这一问题。在这项研究中,我们首次将SHAP分析结果与Borda方法结合起来,为决策者提供了解释ML模型的便利。在这项研究中,使用从文献中收集的数据,将集成ML算法用于土壤液化预测。对超参数化模型的预测性能进行了比较,相关结果在0.91 ~ 0.93之间。通过评估其他性能标准而发现成功的集成ML算法在研究中使用SHAP-Borda方法进行了分析。已经观察到,使用所提出的SHAP-Borda方法,可以将不同ML算法的可解释性结果汇集在一起,并可以呈现最终结果,为决策者提供了方便的评估。研究还表明,(N1)60和amax是预测土壤液化最有效的特征。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Explainable AI using ensemble machine learning with integrated SHapley additive explanations (SHAP)-Borda approach for estimation of the safety factor against soil liquefaction

In most of the studies on soil liquefaction prediction based on Machine Learning (ML), the models presented are presented in a closed box structure. In the studies where the effect of the features on the model performance is analyzed with Interpretability methods, it is seen that the order of effect of the features changes for each ML algorithm. This situation makes the results of the studies conducted on the same subject inconsistent. In this study, we propose an integrated SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP)-Borda approach to overcome this problem. With this study, we provide decision makers with ease in explaining ML models by combining SHAP analysis results with the Borda method for the first time. In the study, ensemble ML algorithms were used for soil liquefaction prediction using data collected from the literature. The performances of the model predictions obtained by hyper parameterization were compared, and correlation results ranging from 0.91 to 0.93 were obtained. Ensemble ML algorithms that were found to be successful as a result of evaluating other performance criteria were analyzed with the SHAP-Borda approach in the study. It has been observed that with the proposed SHAP-Borda approach, the interpretability results of different ML algorithms can be brought together, and a final result can be presented, providing ease of evaluation for decision makers. The study also shows that (N1)60 and amax are the most effective features in predicting soil liquefaction.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Earth Sciences
Environmental Earth Sciences 环境科学-地球科学综合
CiteScore
5.10
自引率
3.60%
发文量
494
审稿时长
8.3 months
期刊介绍: Environmental Earth Sciences is an international multidisciplinary journal concerned with all aspects of interaction between humans, natural resources, ecosystems, special climates or unique geographic zones, and the earth: Water and soil contamination caused by waste management and disposal practices Environmental problems associated with transportation by land, air, or water Geological processes that may impact biosystems or humans Man-made or naturally occurring geological or hydrological hazards Environmental problems associated with the recovery of materials from the earth Environmental problems caused by extraction of minerals, coal, and ores, as well as oil and gas, water and alternative energy sources Environmental impacts of exploration and recultivation – Environmental impacts of hazardous materials Management of environmental data and information in data banks and information systems Dissemination of knowledge on techniques, methods, approaches and experiences to improve and remediate the environment In pursuit of these topics, the geoscientific disciplines are invited to contribute their knowledge and experience. Major disciplines include: hydrogeology, hydrochemistry, geochemistry, geophysics, engineering geology, remediation science, natural resources management, environmental climatology and biota, environmental geography, soil science and geomicrobiology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信