交通管理中的可交易信用方案:理论与实验研究的现状与比较

IF 3.8 Q2 TRANSPORTATION
Giovanni Albano , Konstantinos Mattas , Andromachi Mourtzouchou , Ravi Seshadri , Bat-hen Nahmias-Biran , Carlos Lima Azevedo , Biagio Ciuffo
{"title":"交通管理中的可交易信用方案:理论与实验研究的现状与比较","authors":"Giovanni Albano ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Mattas ,&nbsp;Andromachi Mourtzouchou ,&nbsp;Ravi Seshadri ,&nbsp;Bat-hen Nahmias-Biran ,&nbsp;Carlos Lima Azevedo ,&nbsp;Biagio Ciuffo","doi":"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101611","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A Tradable Credit Scheme for mobility management (TCS) represents a cutting-edge instrument to manage the transport demand and combat traffic congestion. In a TCS, a central authority, such as a municipality, distributes a certain number of credits to potential travellers within a network and charges them credit-based tariffs according to their mobility choices; travellers who save credits can profit by selling their unused credits to other travellers. Compared to other demand management strategies, such as pricing or odd–even plate rationing schemes, TCSs can be more equity-oriented and more likely to be accepted by public opinion, putting them under the research community’s focus in the last decade. In this regard, numerous TCS design frameworks have been proposed. Moreover, first experiments have been conducted, assessing the effectiveness of TCSs in practice and bringing the TCS concept closer to real-world application, though full-scale implementation is yet to be realized.</div><div>In the present review we thoroughly examine all the elements and actors of a TCS, and re-evaluate the research efforts in light of recent experiments. A wide variety of assumptions and design decisions emerged from the literature, revealing tendencies in terms of role of the Central Authority, user characterization, network considered, charging and allocation strategies, and market type. At the same time, gaps were identified in relation to user identification, behavioural response, allocation frequency, and credit trading. Finally, the comparison between experimental and theoretical studies showed differences in terms of network considered, demand representation, charging strategy and credit market.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":36621,"journal":{"name":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","volume":"33 ","pages":"Article 101611"},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Tradable credit scheme for mobility management: state of the art and comparison of theoretical and experimental research\",\"authors\":\"Giovanni Albano ,&nbsp;Konstantinos Mattas ,&nbsp;Andromachi Mourtzouchou ,&nbsp;Ravi Seshadri ,&nbsp;Bat-hen Nahmias-Biran ,&nbsp;Carlos Lima Azevedo ,&nbsp;Biagio Ciuffo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.trip.2025.101611\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A Tradable Credit Scheme for mobility management (TCS) represents a cutting-edge instrument to manage the transport demand and combat traffic congestion. In a TCS, a central authority, such as a municipality, distributes a certain number of credits to potential travellers within a network and charges them credit-based tariffs according to their mobility choices; travellers who save credits can profit by selling their unused credits to other travellers. Compared to other demand management strategies, such as pricing or odd–even plate rationing schemes, TCSs can be more equity-oriented and more likely to be accepted by public opinion, putting them under the research community’s focus in the last decade. In this regard, numerous TCS design frameworks have been proposed. Moreover, first experiments have been conducted, assessing the effectiveness of TCSs in practice and bringing the TCS concept closer to real-world application, though full-scale implementation is yet to be realized.</div><div>In the present review we thoroughly examine all the elements and actors of a TCS, and re-evaluate the research efforts in light of recent experiments. A wide variety of assumptions and design decisions emerged from the literature, revealing tendencies in terms of role of the Central Authority, user characterization, network considered, charging and allocation strategies, and market type. At the same time, gaps were identified in relation to user identification, behavioural response, allocation frequency, and credit trading. Finally, the comparison between experimental and theoretical studies showed differences in terms of network considered, demand representation, charging strategy and credit market.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36621,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"volume\":\"33 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101611\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002908\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"TRANSPORTATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590198225002908","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"TRANSPORTATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

流动交通管理积分计划是管理交通需求和对抗交通挤塞的一项前沿工具。在TCS中,一个中央机构,如市政当局,向网络内的潜在旅行者分配一定数量的信用,并根据他们的出行选择向他们收取基于信用的费用;节省积分的旅客可以通过将未使用的积分出售给其他旅客而获利。与其他需求管理策略(如定价或单双号板配给方案)相比,tcs更以公平为导向,更有可能被公众舆论所接受,这使得它们在过去十年中成为研究界的焦点。在这方面,已经提出了许多TCS设计框架。此外,已经进行了第一次实验,评估了TCS在实践中的有效性,并使TCS概念更接近于现实世界的应用,尽管全面实施尚未实现。在本综述中,我们彻底检查了TCS的所有元素和参与者,并根据最近的实验重新评估研究工作。从文献中出现了各种各样的假设和设计决策,揭示了中央机构的角色、用户特征、考虑的网络、收费和分配策略以及市场类型方面的趋势。同时,还发现了用户识别、行为反应、分配频率和信用交易方面的差距。最后,对比实验研究和理论研究,发现在考虑网络、需求表示、收费策略和信用市场等方面存在差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Tradable credit scheme for mobility management: state of the art and comparison of theoretical and experimental research
A Tradable Credit Scheme for mobility management (TCS) represents a cutting-edge instrument to manage the transport demand and combat traffic congestion. In a TCS, a central authority, such as a municipality, distributes a certain number of credits to potential travellers within a network and charges them credit-based tariffs according to their mobility choices; travellers who save credits can profit by selling their unused credits to other travellers. Compared to other demand management strategies, such as pricing or odd–even plate rationing schemes, TCSs can be more equity-oriented and more likely to be accepted by public opinion, putting them under the research community’s focus in the last decade. In this regard, numerous TCS design frameworks have been proposed. Moreover, first experiments have been conducted, assessing the effectiveness of TCSs in practice and bringing the TCS concept closer to real-world application, though full-scale implementation is yet to be realized.
In the present review we thoroughly examine all the elements and actors of a TCS, and re-evaluate the research efforts in light of recent experiments. A wide variety of assumptions and design decisions emerged from the literature, revealing tendencies in terms of role of the Central Authority, user characterization, network considered, charging and allocation strategies, and market type. At the same time, gaps were identified in relation to user identification, behavioural response, allocation frequency, and credit trading. Finally, the comparison between experimental and theoretical studies showed differences in terms of network considered, demand representation, charging strategy and credit market.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives
Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives Engineering-Automotive Engineering
CiteScore
12.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
185
审稿时长
22 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信