J. Scherñuk, M.G. Dorsemaine, J.K. Toapanta Ortega, D. Zimmermann, I.P. Tobia, D. Santillán
{"title":"泌尿科的外科手术技能:拉丁美洲国家居民与执业专业人员之间的一致性","authors":"J. Scherñuk, M.G. Dorsemaine, J.K. Toapanta Ortega, D. Zimmermann, I.P. Tobia, D. Santillán","doi":"10.1016/j.acuro.2025.501794","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Consensus remains lacking on which surgeries should be deemed essential for general urologists and which should be reserved for subspecialists. This study aims to compare the perceptions of urology trainees (Trainees) and practicing urologists (PractUrol) regarding the relevance of surgeries for independent practice and subspecialist training.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional comparative study on Trainees and PractUrol from a Latin-American country. Participants completed a Google Forms® questionnaire on 56 urological surgeries in September-October 2023, categorizing each as Essential Index (E-index), Supervised Index (Sup-index), or Subspecialty (Subspec). Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni correction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 138 participants (109 PractUrol, 29 Trainees), 78.6% (44/56) of surgeries showed agreement between groups, with 13 surgeries achieving over 75% concordance. Disagreements were noted for 21.4% (12/56) of surgeries: (1) Microvaricocelectomy, penectomy, DVIU, ureteral reimplantation, and vesicovaginal fístula repair were more often classified as Subspec by Trainees but as E-index by PractUrol. (2) Radical cystectomy with orthotopic diversion and Boari Flap were classified as Subspec by Trainees but as Sup-index by PractUrol. (3) Partial cystectomy, pelvic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy were more frequently deemed Subspec by Trainees. (4) Flexible ureteroscopy was considered E-index by Trainees but Sup-index by PractUrol. (5) Artificial urinary sphincter placement was more often classified as Sup-index by PractUrol.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is substantial agreement on the relevance of urological surgeries between PractUrol and Trainees, including 13 surgeries deemed essential by over 75% of participants. However, differing opinions on 12 surgeries highlight areas for further discussion.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":7145,"journal":{"name":"Actas urologicas espanolas","volume":"49 7","pages":"Article 501794"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competencias quirúrgicas en urología: concordancia entre la percepción de residentes y profesionales en ejercicio en un país latinoamericano\",\"authors\":\"J. Scherñuk, M.G. Dorsemaine, J.K. Toapanta Ortega, D. Zimmermann, I.P. Tobia, D. Santillán\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.acuro.2025.501794\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Consensus remains lacking on which surgeries should be deemed essential for general urologists and which should be reserved for subspecialists. This study aims to compare the perceptions of urology trainees (Trainees) and practicing urologists (PractUrol) regarding the relevance of surgeries for independent practice and subspecialist training.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>Cross-sectional comparative study on Trainees and PractUrol from a Latin-American country. Participants completed a Google Forms® questionnaire on 56 urological surgeries in September-October 2023, categorizing each as Essential Index (E-index), Supervised Index (Sup-index), or Subspecialty (Subspec). Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni correction.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>Among 138 participants (109 PractUrol, 29 Trainees), 78.6% (44/56) of surgeries showed agreement between groups, with 13 surgeries achieving over 75% concordance. Disagreements were noted for 21.4% (12/56) of surgeries: (1) Microvaricocelectomy, penectomy, DVIU, ureteral reimplantation, and vesicovaginal fístula repair were more often classified as Subspec by Trainees but as E-index by PractUrol. (2) Radical cystectomy with orthotopic diversion and Boari Flap were classified as Subspec by Trainees but as Sup-index by PractUrol. (3) Partial cystectomy, pelvic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy were more frequently deemed Subspec by Trainees. (4) Flexible ureteroscopy was considered E-index by Trainees but Sup-index by PractUrol. (5) Artificial urinary sphincter placement was more often classified as Sup-index by PractUrol.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>There is substantial agreement on the relevance of urological surgeries between PractUrol and Trainees, including 13 surgeries deemed essential by over 75% of participants. However, differing opinions on 12 surgeries highlight areas for further discussion.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7145,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"volume\":\"49 7\",\"pages\":\"Article 501794\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Actas urologicas espanolas\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480625001123\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Actas urologicas espanolas","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0210480625001123","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"UROLOGY & NEPHROLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competencias quirúrgicas en urología: concordancia entre la percepción de residentes y profesionales en ejercicio en un país latinoamericano
Introduction
Consensus remains lacking on which surgeries should be deemed essential for general urologists and which should be reserved for subspecialists. This study aims to compare the perceptions of urology trainees (Trainees) and practicing urologists (PractUrol) regarding the relevance of surgeries for independent practice and subspecialist training.
Methods
Cross-sectional comparative study on Trainees and PractUrol from a Latin-American country. Participants completed a Google Forms® questionnaire on 56 urological surgeries in September-October 2023, categorizing each as Essential Index (E-index), Supervised Index (Sup-index), or Subspecialty (Subspec). Statistical comparisons were performed using Chi-square or Fisher's exact tests with Bonferroni correction.
Results
Among 138 participants (109 PractUrol, 29 Trainees), 78.6% (44/56) of surgeries showed agreement between groups, with 13 surgeries achieving over 75% concordance. Disagreements were noted for 21.4% (12/56) of surgeries: (1) Microvaricocelectomy, penectomy, DVIU, ureteral reimplantation, and vesicovaginal fístula repair were more often classified as Subspec by Trainees but as E-index by PractUrol. (2) Radical cystectomy with orthotopic diversion and Boari Flap were classified as Subspec by Trainees but as Sup-index by PractUrol. (3) Partial cystectomy, pelvic, and inguinal lymphadenectomy were more frequently deemed Subspec by Trainees. (4) Flexible ureteroscopy was considered E-index by Trainees but Sup-index by PractUrol. (5) Artificial urinary sphincter placement was more often classified as Sup-index by PractUrol.
Conclusion
There is substantial agreement on the relevance of urological surgeries between PractUrol and Trainees, including 13 surgeries deemed essential by over 75% of participants. However, differing opinions on 12 surgeries highlight areas for further discussion.
期刊介绍:
Actas Urológicas Españolas is an international journal dedicated to urological diseases and renal transplant. It has been the official publication of the Spanish Urology Association since 1974 and of the American Urology Confederation since 2008. Its articles cover all aspects related to urology.
Actas Urológicas Españolas, governed by the peer review system (double blinded), is published online in Spanish and English. Consequently, manuscripts may be sent in Spanish or English and bidirectional free cost translation will be provided.