当地能源社区的价值评估和设计优化:荷兰案例研究

IF 12 1区 工程技术 Q1 CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY
Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh, Pieter-Jan Hoes, Jan Hensen
{"title":"当地能源社区的价值评估和设计优化:荷兰案例研究","authors":"Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh,&nbsp;Pieter-Jan Hoes,&nbsp;Jan Hensen","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 106738"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value assessment and design optimization of local energy communities: a Dutch case study\",\"authors\":\"Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh,&nbsp;Pieter-Jan Hoes,&nbsp;Jan Hensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

地方能源社区(lec)为改善可再生能源的整合和支持能源转型提供了一个有希望的解决方案。本研究以荷兰办公楼为例,提出了一种基于模拟的方法来优化LEC设计,并评估其相对于传统设计和(单个)建筑运营的附加值。考虑到建筑改造、光伏系统大小、电池储能容量和供暖系统类型,模拟了各种LEC设计配置。此外,采用混合整数线性规划(MILP)优化方法对多种电池控制策略进行建模,并评估其对关键性能指标的影响。符合利益相关者利益的最佳LEC设计包括用热泵取代燃气锅炉、2800千瓦时的社区电池和两倍于总屋顶面积的光伏系统。该配置可降低66%的运营成本和60%的运营二氧化碳,并实现41%的投资回报率。此外,通过降低运营成本高达8%,减少运营二氧化碳高达7%,并消除承包商峰值违规,发现LECs优于单个建筑级别的优化。然而,在社区电池配置中,本地网络电缆容量违规是一个重大挑战,而单独的建筑级电池更有效地缓解了这些问题。考虑到这些限制,LECs在成本和二氧化碳减排方面的全部潜力可以通过先进的社区电池控制策略和有针对性的基础设施升级来释放,以确保未来能源系统的可行和可扩展的解决方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Value assessment and design optimization of local energy communities: a Dutch case study
Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Sustainable Cities and Society
Sustainable Cities and Society Social Sciences-Geography, Planning and Development
CiteScore
22.00
自引率
13.70%
发文量
810
审稿时长
27 days
期刊介绍: Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including: 1. Smart cities and resilient environments; 2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management; 3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management); 4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities; 5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments; 6. Green infrastructure and BMPs; 7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management; 8. Urban agriculture and forestry; 9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure; 10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy; 11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities; 12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities; 13. Health monitoring and improvement; 14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies; 15. Smart city governance; 16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society; 17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies; 18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems. 19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management; 20. Waste reduction and recycling; 21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling; 22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信