Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh, Pieter-Jan Hoes, Jan Hensen
{"title":"当地能源社区的价值评估和设计优化:荷兰案例研究","authors":"Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh, Pieter-Jan Hoes, Jan Hensen","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106738","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48659,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Cities and Society","volume":"131 ","pages":"Article 106738"},"PeriodicalIF":12.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Value assessment and design optimization of local energy communities: a Dutch case study\",\"authors\":\"Farzaneh Mousavi Motlagh, Pieter-Jan Hoes, Jan Hensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.scs.2025.106738\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48659,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"volume\":\"131 \",\"pages\":\"Article 106738\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":12.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Cities and Society\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006122\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Cities and Society","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2210670725006122","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"CONSTRUCTION & BUILDING TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Value assessment and design optimization of local energy communities: a Dutch case study
Local energy communities (LECs) offer a promising solution to improve the integration of renewable energy and support the energy transition. This study proposes a simulation-based methodology to optimize LEC design and assess its added value over conventional design and operation of (individual) buildings, using Dutch office buildings as a case study. Various LEC design configurations are simulated, considering building retrofits, photovoltaic system sizes, battery energy storage capacities, and heating system types. Additionally, multiple battery control strategies are modeled using a mixed-integer linear programming (MILP) optimization approach and their impact on key performance indicators is evaluated. The best performing LEC design, aligning with stakeholders’ interests, includes the replacement of gas boilers with heat pumps, a 2800 kWh community battery, and PV systems twice the total roof area. This configuration reduces operational costs by 66 % and operational CO₂ by 60 % and achieves a return on investment of 41 %. Furthermore, LECs are found to outperform individual building-level optimization by lowering operational costs up to 8 % , decreasing operational CO₂ up to 7 %, and eliminating contractor peak violations. However, local network cable capacity violations are a significant challenge in the community battery configuration, while individual building-level batteries mitigate these issues more effectively. Considering these limitations, LECs’ full potential for cost and CO₂ emission reductions can be unlocked through advanced community battery control strategies and targeted infrastructure upgrades to ensure a viable and scalable solution for future energy systems.
期刊介绍:
Sustainable Cities and Society (SCS) is an international journal that focuses on fundamental and applied research to promote environmentally sustainable and socially resilient cities. The journal welcomes cross-cutting, multi-disciplinary research in various areas, including:
1. Smart cities and resilient environments;
2. Alternative/clean energy sources, energy distribution, distributed energy generation, and energy demand reduction/management;
3. Monitoring and improving air quality in built environment and cities (e.g., healthy built environment and air quality management);
4. Energy efficient, low/zero carbon, and green buildings/communities;
5. Climate change mitigation and adaptation in urban environments;
6. Green infrastructure and BMPs;
7. Environmental Footprint accounting and management;
8. Urban agriculture and forestry;
9. ICT, smart grid and intelligent infrastructure;
10. Urban design/planning, regulations, legislation, certification, economics, and policy;
11. Social aspects, impacts and resiliency of cities;
12. Behavior monitoring, analysis and change within urban communities;
13. Health monitoring and improvement;
14. Nexus issues related to sustainable cities and societies;
15. Smart city governance;
16. Decision Support Systems for trade-off and uncertainty analysis for improved management of cities and society;
17. Big data, machine learning, and artificial intelligence applications and case studies;
18. Critical infrastructure protection, including security, privacy, forensics, and reliability issues of cyber-physical systems.
19. Water footprint reduction and urban water distribution, harvesting, treatment, reuse and management;
20. Waste reduction and recycling;
21. Wastewater collection, treatment and recycling;
22. Smart, clean and healthy transportation systems and infrastructure;