非洲南方古猿化石牙齿直接定年的挑战,南非Taung Child型遗址

IF 2.5 2区 地球科学 Q3 GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL
Wenjing Yu , Andy I.R. Herries , Renaud Joannes-Boyau
{"title":"非洲南方古猿化石牙齿直接定年的挑战,南非Taung Child型遗址","authors":"Wenjing Yu ,&nbsp;Andy I.R. Herries ,&nbsp;Renaud Joannes-Boyau","doi":"10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101696","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This paper presents the analyses of Combined Uranium Series and Electron Spin Resonance (US-ESR) dating on enamel fragments from five fossil teeth from the Hrdlička Pinnacle of the <em>Australopithecus africanus</em> Type Site at the Buxton-Norlim Limeworks, near Taung, South Africa. The mammal teeth were recovered from two types of deposits, the <em>A. africanus</em> bearing Pink Claystone (PCS) deposit that formed as layers within the Thabaseek tufa, and the secondary Yellow Red Sandstone (YRSS) deposit that filled cavities eroded through the tufa and PCS. The teeth were dated using enamel fragments following the US-ESR procedure. Two software programs, USESR (Shao et al., 2014) and DATA (Grün et al., 1988) were employed for the age estimation, however, the USESR software encountered numerous challenges, especially in modelling uranium uptake history. This is the first attempt to date a Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene tufa deposit using US-ESR dating. The complicated history, poor preservation of the samples, and the diagenetic process in the fossil teeth samples make the dating very challenging. Especially as all samples suffered from uranium leaching and three of the five samples had high uranium concentrations in the enamel. This appears to be related to the nature of the tufa environment where high uranium concentrations have also been identified in secondary flowstones formed in caves within the tufa deposits. The final age estimate for the PCS deposits, contemporary with the Taung skull, is a minimum of approximately 2.4 Ma, based on the EU model. Similarly, a minimum age of approximately 1.8 Ma is estimated for the YRSS deposits. The USESR ages (∼2.0 Ma for the PCS deposit and ∼1.3 Ma for the YRSS deposit) were less preferred due to being derived using an extrapolation function. Nevertheless, all results are associated with many uncertainties and complexities and it should be approached with great caution. Another possibility is that the deposit might be challenging to date using the USESR method. The difficulties of dating old sites like Taung in South Africa and in particular tufa environment have been highlighted.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54516,"journal":{"name":"Quaternary Geochronology","volume":"90 ","pages":"Article 101696"},"PeriodicalIF":2.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The challenges of direct dating of fossil teeth from the Australopithecus africanus, Taung Child type site, South Africa\",\"authors\":\"Wenjing Yu ,&nbsp;Andy I.R. Herries ,&nbsp;Renaud Joannes-Boyau\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.quageo.2025.101696\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This paper presents the analyses of Combined Uranium Series and Electron Spin Resonance (US-ESR) dating on enamel fragments from five fossil teeth from the Hrdlička Pinnacle of the <em>Australopithecus africanus</em> Type Site at the Buxton-Norlim Limeworks, near Taung, South Africa. The mammal teeth were recovered from two types of deposits, the <em>A. africanus</em> bearing Pink Claystone (PCS) deposit that formed as layers within the Thabaseek tufa, and the secondary Yellow Red Sandstone (YRSS) deposit that filled cavities eroded through the tufa and PCS. The teeth were dated using enamel fragments following the US-ESR procedure. Two software programs, USESR (Shao et al., 2014) and DATA (Grün et al., 1988) were employed for the age estimation, however, the USESR software encountered numerous challenges, especially in modelling uranium uptake history. This is the first attempt to date a Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene tufa deposit using US-ESR dating. The complicated history, poor preservation of the samples, and the diagenetic process in the fossil teeth samples make the dating very challenging. Especially as all samples suffered from uranium leaching and three of the five samples had high uranium concentrations in the enamel. This appears to be related to the nature of the tufa environment where high uranium concentrations have also been identified in secondary flowstones formed in caves within the tufa deposits. The final age estimate for the PCS deposits, contemporary with the Taung skull, is a minimum of approximately 2.4 Ma, based on the EU model. Similarly, a minimum age of approximately 1.8 Ma is estimated for the YRSS deposits. The USESR ages (∼2.0 Ma for the PCS deposit and ∼1.3 Ma for the YRSS deposit) were less preferred due to being derived using an extrapolation function. Nevertheless, all results are associated with many uncertainties and complexities and it should be approached with great caution. Another possibility is that the deposit might be challenging to date using the USESR method. The difficulties of dating old sites like Taung in South Africa and in particular tufa environment have been highlighted.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quaternary Geochronology\",\"volume\":\"90 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101696\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quaternary Geochronology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101425000470\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quaternary Geochronology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871101425000470","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOGRAPHY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文介绍了在南非东(Taung)附近的Buxton-Norlim Limeworks的非洲南方古猿(Australopithecus africanus)类型遗址的hrdli石峰(hrdlika Pinnacle)的5个牙齿化石的牙釉质碎片的联合铀系列和电子自旋共振(US-ESR)测年分析。这些哺乳动物的牙齿是在两种类型的沉积物中发现的,一种是在Thabaseek凝灰岩中形成的含有粉红色粘土(PCS)的非洲古猿(A. africanus)沉积物,另一种是在凝灰岩和PCS中形成的次生黄红砂岩(YRSS)沉积物,这些沉积物填充了通过凝灰岩和PCS侵蚀的空洞。根据US-ESR程序使用牙釉质碎片确定牙齿的年代。两个软件程序,USESR (Shao等人,2014)和DATA (gr等人,1988)用于年龄估计,然而,USESR软件遇到了许多挑战,特别是在模拟铀吸收历史方面。这是第一次尝试用US-ESR定年来确定晚上新世至早更新世凝灰岩沉积的年代。复杂的历史、保存较差的样品以及化石牙齿样品中的成岩过程使得测年非常具有挑战性。特别是所有的样品都遭受了铀浸出,五个样品中的三个在珐琅中含有高浓度的铀。这似乎与凝灰岩环境的性质有关,在凝灰岩矿床的洞穴中形成的次生流岩中也发现了高浓度的铀。与陶头骨同时代的PCS沉积物的最终年龄估计,根据EU模型,至少约为2.4 Ma。同样,YRSS矿床的最小年龄估计约为1.8 Ma。USESR年龄(PCS沉积层为~ 2.0 Ma, YRSS沉积层为~ 1.3 Ma)由于使用外推函数推导而不太受欢迎。然而,所有的结果都与许多不确定性和复杂性有关,应该非常谨慎地对待。另一种可能性是,使用USESR方法对储层进行测年可能具有挑战性。像南非的陶遗址这样的古老遗址,尤其是凝灰岩环境,确定年代的困难已经得到了强调。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The challenges of direct dating of fossil teeth from the Australopithecus africanus, Taung Child type site, South Africa
This paper presents the analyses of Combined Uranium Series and Electron Spin Resonance (US-ESR) dating on enamel fragments from five fossil teeth from the Hrdlička Pinnacle of the Australopithecus africanus Type Site at the Buxton-Norlim Limeworks, near Taung, South Africa. The mammal teeth were recovered from two types of deposits, the A. africanus bearing Pink Claystone (PCS) deposit that formed as layers within the Thabaseek tufa, and the secondary Yellow Red Sandstone (YRSS) deposit that filled cavities eroded through the tufa and PCS. The teeth were dated using enamel fragments following the US-ESR procedure. Two software programs, USESR (Shao et al., 2014) and DATA (Grün et al., 1988) were employed for the age estimation, however, the USESR software encountered numerous challenges, especially in modelling uranium uptake history. This is the first attempt to date a Late Pliocene to Early Pleistocene tufa deposit using US-ESR dating. The complicated history, poor preservation of the samples, and the diagenetic process in the fossil teeth samples make the dating very challenging. Especially as all samples suffered from uranium leaching and three of the five samples had high uranium concentrations in the enamel. This appears to be related to the nature of the tufa environment where high uranium concentrations have also been identified in secondary flowstones formed in caves within the tufa deposits. The final age estimate for the PCS deposits, contemporary with the Taung skull, is a minimum of approximately 2.4 Ma, based on the EU model. Similarly, a minimum age of approximately 1.8 Ma is estimated for the YRSS deposits. The USESR ages (∼2.0 Ma for the PCS deposit and ∼1.3 Ma for the YRSS deposit) were less preferred due to being derived using an extrapolation function. Nevertheless, all results are associated with many uncertainties and complexities and it should be approached with great caution. Another possibility is that the deposit might be challenging to date using the USESR method. The difficulties of dating old sites like Taung in South Africa and in particular tufa environment have been highlighted.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quaternary Geochronology
Quaternary Geochronology 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
22.20%
发文量
130
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: Quaternary Geochronology is an international journal devoted to the publication of the highest-quality, peer-reviewed articles on all aspects of dating methods applicable to the Quaternary Period - the last 2.6 million years of Earth history. Reliable ages are fundamental to place changes in climates, landscapes, flora and fauna - including the evolution and ecological impact of humans - in their correct temporal sequence, and to understand the tempo and mode of geological and biological processes.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信