学校心理学期刊中种族/民族相关差异的讨论:描述性回顾

IF 4.1 1区 心理学 Q1 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL
Victor Villarreal , Lisa S. Peterson , Laura M. Peña , Danette Y. Martinez , Cha Yong Patterson
{"title":"学校心理学期刊中种族/民族相关差异的讨论:描述性回顾","authors":"Victor Villarreal ,&nbsp;Lisa S. Peterson ,&nbsp;Laura M. Peña ,&nbsp;Danette Y. Martinez ,&nbsp;Cha Yong Patterson","doi":"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101488","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In recent years there has been growing awareness of the importance of addressing equity issues in school psychology. This awareness extends to school psychology research, where there remains a need for systematic analysis to better understand how race/ethnicity and race/ethnic group differences, specifically, are reported in research. In this article, we present a descriptive review of the treatment of race/ethnicity analyses in quantitative research articles published in five major school psychology journals from 2021 to 2023. 117 articles meeting specific inclusion criteria were coded across article sections (i.e., introduction, method, and discussion) for the presence and handling of race/ethnicity-related group differences content. Descriptive statistics were employed to explore the extent and substantive focus of the discussions of race/ethnicity differences in journal articles. Results indicate widespread inclusion of race/ethnicity in journal article introduction and discussion sections, with a similar number of articles presenting race from an anti-deficit perspective than from a context-free, atheoretical perspective. However, we found that a sizable proportion of articles center the White experience and fail to discuss any limitations regarding the use of race in research. Guided by deficit thinking conceptualizations and quantitative critical methodologies, we offer recommendations to better inform and guide the research process and how research findings are communicated in school psychology journals.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48232,"journal":{"name":"Journal of School Psychology","volume":"112 ","pages":"Article 101488"},"PeriodicalIF":4.1000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Discussions of race/ethnicity related differences in school psychology journals: A descriptive review\",\"authors\":\"Victor Villarreal ,&nbsp;Lisa S. Peterson ,&nbsp;Laura M. Peña ,&nbsp;Danette Y. Martinez ,&nbsp;Cha Yong Patterson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jsp.2025.101488\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In recent years there has been growing awareness of the importance of addressing equity issues in school psychology. This awareness extends to school psychology research, where there remains a need for systematic analysis to better understand how race/ethnicity and race/ethnic group differences, specifically, are reported in research. In this article, we present a descriptive review of the treatment of race/ethnicity analyses in quantitative research articles published in five major school psychology journals from 2021 to 2023. 117 articles meeting specific inclusion criteria were coded across article sections (i.e., introduction, method, and discussion) for the presence and handling of race/ethnicity-related group differences content. Descriptive statistics were employed to explore the extent and substantive focus of the discussions of race/ethnicity differences in journal articles. Results indicate widespread inclusion of race/ethnicity in journal article introduction and discussion sections, with a similar number of articles presenting race from an anti-deficit perspective than from a context-free, atheoretical perspective. However, we found that a sizable proportion of articles center the White experience and fail to discuss any limitations regarding the use of race in research. Guided by deficit thinking conceptualizations and quantitative critical methodologies, we offer recommendations to better inform and guide the research process and how research findings are communicated in school psychology journals.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48232,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"volume\":\"112 \",\"pages\":\"Article 101488\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of School Psychology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000615\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of School Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022440525000615","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

近年来,人们越来越意识到解决学校心理公平问题的重要性。这种意识延伸到学校心理学研究,在那里仍然需要系统的分析,以更好地理解种族/民族和种族/民族群体的差异,具体来说,是如何在研究中报告的。在本文中,我们对2021年至2023年间发表在五家主要学校心理学期刊上的定量研究文章中种族/民族分析的处理方法进行了描述性回顾。117篇符合特定纳入标准的文章在文章部分(即介绍、方法和讨论)中进行编码,以呈现和处理与种族/民族相关的群体差异内容。使用描述性统计来探索期刊文章中种族/民族差异讨论的范围和实质性焦点。结果表明,在期刊文章的介绍和讨论部分广泛包含种族/民族,从反赤字角度呈现种族的文章数量与从上下文无关的理论角度呈现种族的文章数量相似。然而,我们发现相当大比例的文章以白人的经历为中心,没有讨论在研究中使用种族的任何限制。在缺陷思维概念和定量批判方法的指导下,我们提供建议,以更好地告知和指导研究过程,以及如何在学校心理学期刊上传达研究结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Discussions of race/ethnicity related differences in school psychology journals: A descriptive review
In recent years there has been growing awareness of the importance of addressing equity issues in school psychology. This awareness extends to school psychology research, where there remains a need for systematic analysis to better understand how race/ethnicity and race/ethnic group differences, specifically, are reported in research. In this article, we present a descriptive review of the treatment of race/ethnicity analyses in quantitative research articles published in five major school psychology journals from 2021 to 2023. 117 articles meeting specific inclusion criteria were coded across article sections (i.e., introduction, method, and discussion) for the presence and handling of race/ethnicity-related group differences content. Descriptive statistics were employed to explore the extent and substantive focus of the discussions of race/ethnicity differences in journal articles. Results indicate widespread inclusion of race/ethnicity in journal article introduction and discussion sections, with a similar number of articles presenting race from an anti-deficit perspective than from a context-free, atheoretical perspective. However, we found that a sizable proportion of articles center the White experience and fail to discuss any limitations regarding the use of race in research. Guided by deficit thinking conceptualizations and quantitative critical methodologies, we offer recommendations to better inform and guide the research process and how research findings are communicated in school psychology journals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of School Psychology
Journal of School Psychology PSYCHOLOGY, EDUCATIONAL-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
8.00%
发文量
71
期刊介绍: The Journal of School Psychology publishes original empirical articles and critical reviews of the literature on research and practices relevant to psychological and behavioral processes in school settings. JSP presents research on intervention mechanisms and approaches; schooling effects on the development of social, cognitive, mental-health, and achievement-related outcomes; assessment; and consultation. Submissions from a variety of disciplines are encouraged. All manuscripts are read by the Editor and one or more editorial consultants with the intent of providing appropriate and constructive written reviews.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信