限额与交易政策下可再生电力两阶段混合电力市场交易策略优化

IF 14.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS
Weisi Zhang , Qingsong Mao , Xia Pan , Rui Luo , Ling Liang
{"title":"限额与交易政策下可再生电力两阶段混合电力市场交易策略优化","authors":"Weisi Zhang ,&nbsp;Qingsong Mao ,&nbsp;Xia Pan ,&nbsp;Rui Luo ,&nbsp;Ling Liang","doi":"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108764","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>With the trial operation of a two-stage electricity trading mechanism, and the pilot of cap-and-trade policy in the electricity sector, optimizing strategies within a hybrid electricity market has emerged as a hot research topic. To explore the scenario of integrating renewable electricity to form a hybrid electricity market, and to analyze the impact of cap-and-trade policy on electricity market transactions, this study employs game theory to establish a two-stage electricity market analysis framework, which encompasses transactions by traditional thermal electricity generator and renewable electricity generator in the forward and spot markets. The research findings indicate that widespread integration of renewable electricity lowers spot electricity prices but may cause forward prices to rise during significant spot market volatility. It also significantly reduces carbon emissions, while an initial surge in emissions could occur, in the early stages of renewable electricity integration with low spot market demand volatility. Two-stage trading could mitigate spot price and enhance profitability of traditional thermal electricity generators, during periods of substantial market volatility. Regarding the cap-and-trade policy, it generally leads to lower electricity prices in both forward and spot markets under conditions of loose carbon emission constraints, and the impact on generators' profitability is contingent. Specifically, the policy does not invariably negatively affect traditional thermal electricity generator. Under loose emission reduction constraints, the policy does not necessarily increase the profits of renewable electricity generator.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":11665,"journal":{"name":"Energy Economics","volume":"150 ","pages":"Article 108764"},"PeriodicalIF":14.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two-stage hybrid electricity market trading strategy optimization with renewable electricity under cap-and-trade policy\",\"authors\":\"Weisi Zhang ,&nbsp;Qingsong Mao ,&nbsp;Xia Pan ,&nbsp;Rui Luo ,&nbsp;Ling Liang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.eneco.2025.108764\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>With the trial operation of a two-stage electricity trading mechanism, and the pilot of cap-and-trade policy in the electricity sector, optimizing strategies within a hybrid electricity market has emerged as a hot research topic. To explore the scenario of integrating renewable electricity to form a hybrid electricity market, and to analyze the impact of cap-and-trade policy on electricity market transactions, this study employs game theory to establish a two-stage electricity market analysis framework, which encompasses transactions by traditional thermal electricity generator and renewable electricity generator in the forward and spot markets. The research findings indicate that widespread integration of renewable electricity lowers spot electricity prices but may cause forward prices to rise during significant spot market volatility. It also significantly reduces carbon emissions, while an initial surge in emissions could occur, in the early stages of renewable electricity integration with low spot market demand volatility. Two-stage trading could mitigate spot price and enhance profitability of traditional thermal electricity generators, during periods of substantial market volatility. Regarding the cap-and-trade policy, it generally leads to lower electricity prices in both forward and spot markets under conditions of loose carbon emission constraints, and the impact on generators' profitability is contingent. Specifically, the policy does not invariably negatively affect traditional thermal electricity generator. Under loose emission reduction constraints, the policy does not necessarily increase the profits of renewable electricity generator.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11665,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Energy Economics\",\"volume\":\"150 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108764\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":14.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Energy Economics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005912\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Energy Economics","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0140988325005912","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着两阶段电力交易机制的试运行和限额与交易政策在电力领域的试点,混合电力市场的优化策略已成为研究的热点。为探索整合可再生能源电力形成混合电力市场的情景,并分析限额与交易政策对电力市场交易的影响,本研究运用博弈论建立了包括传统火电发电机组和可再生能源发电机组在远期和现货市场交易的两阶段电力市场分析框架。研究结果表明,可再生能源电力的广泛整合降低了现货电价,但可能导致现货市场大幅波动时远期电价上涨。它还显著减少了碳排放,尽管在可再生电力整合的早期阶段,在现货市场需求波动较小的情况下,排放量可能会出现最初的激增。在市场大幅波动期间,两阶段交易可以降低现货价格,提高传统火力发电企业的盈利能力。就总量管制与交易政策而言,在碳排放限制宽松的情况下,它通常会导致远期和现货市场的电价下降,对发电企业盈利能力的影响是偶然的。具体而言,该政策并不一定会对传统火电机组产生负面影响。在宽松的减排约束下,该政策并不一定会增加可再生能源发电企业的利润。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Two-stage hybrid electricity market trading strategy optimization with renewable electricity under cap-and-trade policy
With the trial operation of a two-stage electricity trading mechanism, and the pilot of cap-and-trade policy in the electricity sector, optimizing strategies within a hybrid electricity market has emerged as a hot research topic. To explore the scenario of integrating renewable electricity to form a hybrid electricity market, and to analyze the impact of cap-and-trade policy on electricity market transactions, this study employs game theory to establish a two-stage electricity market analysis framework, which encompasses transactions by traditional thermal electricity generator and renewable electricity generator in the forward and spot markets. The research findings indicate that widespread integration of renewable electricity lowers spot electricity prices but may cause forward prices to rise during significant spot market volatility. It also significantly reduces carbon emissions, while an initial surge in emissions could occur, in the early stages of renewable electricity integration with low spot market demand volatility. Two-stage trading could mitigate spot price and enhance profitability of traditional thermal electricity generators, during periods of substantial market volatility. Regarding the cap-and-trade policy, it generally leads to lower electricity prices in both forward and spot markets under conditions of loose carbon emission constraints, and the impact on generators' profitability is contingent. Specifically, the policy does not invariably negatively affect traditional thermal electricity generator. Under loose emission reduction constraints, the policy does not necessarily increase the profits of renewable electricity generator.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Energy Economics
Energy Economics ECONOMICS-
CiteScore
18.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
524
期刊介绍: Energy Economics is a field journal that focuses on energy economics and energy finance. It covers various themes including the exploitation, conversion, and use of energy, markets for energy commodities and derivatives, regulation and taxation, forecasting, environment and climate, international trade, development, and monetary policy. The journal welcomes contributions that utilize diverse methods such as experiments, surveys, econometrics, decomposition, simulation models, equilibrium models, optimization models, and analytical models. It publishes a combination of papers employing different methods to explore a wide range of topics. The journal's replication policy encourages the submission of replication studies, wherein researchers reproduce and extend the key results of original studies while explaining any differences. Energy Economics is indexed and abstracted in several databases including Environmental Abstracts, Fuel and Energy Abstracts, Social Sciences Citation Index, GEOBASE, Social & Behavioral Sciences, Journal of Economic Literature, INSPEC, and more.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信