用束内双头PET系统验证质子距离的蒙特卡罗模拟模型的实验验证

IF 2.8 3区 物理与天体物理 Q3 CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL
Qin-Nan Gao, Fang-Jing Li, Meng-Wei Ho, Fang-Hsin Chen, Vanny Maranatha Sihotang, Eng-Yen Huang, Kun-Ju Lin, Chi-Shiun Chiang, Hsin-Hon Lin
{"title":"用束内双头PET系统验证质子距离的蒙特卡罗模拟模型的实验验证","authors":"Qin-Nan Gao, Fang-Jing Li, Meng-Wei Ho, Fang-Hsin Chen, Vanny Maranatha Sihotang, Eng-Yen Huang, Kun-Ju Lin, Chi-Shiun Chiang, Hsin-Hon Lin","doi":"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113263","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proton therapy offers highly localized dose distributions, but its clinical potential is limited by uncertainties in proton range. In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of proton-induced β<ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup>-emitting isotopes provides a promising solution for real-time range verification. This study presents a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model for dual-head PET (DHPET)-based range verification using the GATE platform, with experimental validation performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Measurements were conducted using homogeneous phantoms irradiated by proton beams at various energies, and PET images were acquired with a Sumitomo DHPET system. The simulation workflow was divided into two stages: proton-induced β<ce:sup loc=\"post\">+</ce:sup> isotope production and PET image acquisition. Three nuclear models were implemented and compared: GEANT4's built-in theoretical model (QGSP_BIC), EXFOR-based cross sections, and the latest Nuclear Data Sheets (NDS) dataset. The MC model was validated against RayStation-calculated dose distributions and PET measurements from both point and flood sources. Simulated dose distributions showed excellent agreement with RayStation, with a mean range deviation of ±0.2 mm and detector response deviation within ±0.5%. For PET activity profiles, the NDS dataset achieved the closest match to experimental data, EXFOR showed moderate agreement, while QGSP_BIC, despite discrepancies in activity shape, provided superior distal activity range estimates in gel-water phantoms. Under optimal conditions, proton range verification accuracy using the proposed MC simulation model and updated nuclear cross-section models could reach sub-millimeter precision (within ±1 mm). This work establishes a validated MC framework for in-beam DHPET-based range verification and emphasizes the pivotal role of nuclear cross-section selection in optimizing PET-based range estimation.","PeriodicalId":20861,"journal":{"name":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","volume":"300 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental validation of Monte Carlo simulation model for proton range verification using an in-beam dual-head PET system\",\"authors\":\"Qin-Nan Gao, Fang-Jing Li, Meng-Wei Ho, Fang-Hsin Chen, Vanny Maranatha Sihotang, Eng-Yen Huang, Kun-Ju Lin, Chi-Shiun Chiang, Hsin-Hon Lin\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113263\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proton therapy offers highly localized dose distributions, but its clinical potential is limited by uncertainties in proton range. In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of proton-induced β<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">+</ce:sup>-emitting isotopes provides a promising solution for real-time range verification. This study presents a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model for dual-head PET (DHPET)-based range verification using the GATE platform, with experimental validation performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Measurements were conducted using homogeneous phantoms irradiated by proton beams at various energies, and PET images were acquired with a Sumitomo DHPET system. The simulation workflow was divided into two stages: proton-induced β<ce:sup loc=\\\"post\\\">+</ce:sup> isotope production and PET image acquisition. Three nuclear models were implemented and compared: GEANT4's built-in theoretical model (QGSP_BIC), EXFOR-based cross sections, and the latest Nuclear Data Sheets (NDS) dataset. The MC model was validated against RayStation-calculated dose distributions and PET measurements from both point and flood sources. Simulated dose distributions showed excellent agreement with RayStation, with a mean range deviation of ±0.2 mm and detector response deviation within ±0.5%. For PET activity profiles, the NDS dataset achieved the closest match to experimental data, EXFOR showed moderate agreement, while QGSP_BIC, despite discrepancies in activity shape, provided superior distal activity range estimates in gel-water phantoms. Under optimal conditions, proton range verification accuracy using the proposed MC simulation model and updated nuclear cross-section models could reach sub-millimeter precision (within ±1 mm). This work establishes a validated MC framework for in-beam DHPET-based range verification and emphasizes the pivotal role of nuclear cross-section selection in optimizing PET-based range estimation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"volume\":\"300 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Radiation Physics and Chemistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"92\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113263\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"物理与天体物理\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Radiation Physics and Chemistry","FirstCategoryId":"92","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1016/j.radphyschem.2025.113263","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"物理与天体物理","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CHEMISTRY, PHYSICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

质子治疗提供了高度局部的剂量分布,但其临床潜力受到质子范围不确定性的限制。质子诱导β+发射同位素的束内正电子发射断层成像(PET)为实时距离验证提供了一种有前途的解决方案。本研究提出了一种基于GATE平台的双头PET (DHPET)距离验证的综合蒙特卡罗(MC)仿真模型,并在台湾高雄长工纪念医院进行了实验验证。测量使用不同能量的质子束辐照的均匀幻象进行,PET图像使用住友DHPET系统获得。模拟工作流程分为两个阶段:质子诱导β+同位素生成和PET图像采集。采用GEANT4的内置理论模型(QGSP_BIC)、基于exfor的截面模型和最新的核数据表(NDS)数据集对三种核模型进行了实现和比较。MC模型根据raystation计算的剂量分布和来自点源和洪水源的PET测量值进行了验证。模拟的剂量分布与RayStation非常吻合,平均范围偏差为±0.2 mm,探测器响应偏差在±0.5%以内。对于PET活性谱,NDS数据集与实验数据最接近,EXFOR数据集表现出中等程度的一致性,而QGSP_BIC数据集尽管在活性形状上存在差异,但在凝胶水模型中提供了更好的远端活性范围估计。在最佳条件下,采用MC模拟模型和更新后的核截面模型验证质子距离的精度可达到亚毫米精度(±1毫米以内)。本文建立了一个有效的基于束内dhpet的距离验证MC框架,并强调了核截面选择在优化基于pet的距离估计中的关键作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental validation of Monte Carlo simulation model for proton range verification using an in-beam dual-head PET system
Proton therapy offers highly localized dose distributions, but its clinical potential is limited by uncertainties in proton range. In-beam positron emission tomography (PET) imaging of proton-induced β+-emitting isotopes provides a promising solution for real-time range verification. This study presents a comprehensive Monte Carlo (MC) simulation model for dual-head PET (DHPET)-based range verification using the GATE platform, with experimental validation performed at Kaohsiung Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Taiwan. Measurements were conducted using homogeneous phantoms irradiated by proton beams at various energies, and PET images were acquired with a Sumitomo DHPET system. The simulation workflow was divided into two stages: proton-induced β+ isotope production and PET image acquisition. Three nuclear models were implemented and compared: GEANT4's built-in theoretical model (QGSP_BIC), EXFOR-based cross sections, and the latest Nuclear Data Sheets (NDS) dataset. The MC model was validated against RayStation-calculated dose distributions and PET measurements from both point and flood sources. Simulated dose distributions showed excellent agreement with RayStation, with a mean range deviation of ±0.2 mm and detector response deviation within ±0.5%. For PET activity profiles, the NDS dataset achieved the closest match to experimental data, EXFOR showed moderate agreement, while QGSP_BIC, despite discrepancies in activity shape, provided superior distal activity range estimates in gel-water phantoms. Under optimal conditions, proton range verification accuracy using the proposed MC simulation model and updated nuclear cross-section models could reach sub-millimeter precision (within ±1 mm). This work establishes a validated MC framework for in-beam DHPET-based range verification and emphasizes the pivotal role of nuclear cross-section selection in optimizing PET-based range estimation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Radiation Physics and Chemistry
Radiation Physics and Chemistry 化学-核科学技术
CiteScore
5.60
自引率
17.20%
发文量
574
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊介绍: Radiation Physics and Chemistry is a multidisciplinary journal that provides a medium for publication of substantial and original papers, reviews, and short communications which focus on research and developments involving ionizing radiation in radiation physics, radiation chemistry and radiation processing. The journal aims to publish papers with significance to an international audience, containing substantial novelty and scientific impact. The Editors reserve the rights to reject, with or without external review, papers that do not meet these criteria. This could include papers that are very similar to previous publications, only with changed target substrates, employed materials, analyzed sites and experimental methods, report results without presenting new insights and/or hypothesis testing, or do not focus on the radiation effects.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信