Lisa M.W. Vos , Paul Lodder , Michael V. Bronstein , Reuma Gadassi-Polack , Tom Smeets , Jutta Joormann , Jonas Everaert
{"title":"对于精神病理学的跨诊断风险标志,有偏见和不灵活的更新解释是广泛的还是狭窄的?精神病理学分级分类法(HiTOP)镜头","authors":"Lisa M.W. Vos , Paul Lodder , Michael V. Bronstein , Reuma Gadassi-Polack , Tom Smeets , Jutta Joormann , Jonas Everaert","doi":"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104845","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Previous research has linked biased and inflexible interpretations of ambiguous information to various forms of psychopathology. However, existing studies typically investigate these interpretation processes within individual diagnostic categories, overlooking the significant symptom overlap and comorbidity among mental health conditions. Consequently, the extent to which biased and inflexible interpretations represent broad transdiagnostic or more narrowly specific risk factors remains unclear. To address this gap, this study investigated transdiagnostic associations between biased and inflexible interpretation processes and dimensions of psychopathology using the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). HiTOP is a data-driven framework designed to integrate psychopathology symptoms across traditional diagnostic boundaries. A crowdsourced community sample of adults (<em>N</em> = 383) completed a HiTOP self-report battery and the emotional Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence task. This task measures negative and positive interpretation biases, as well as inflexible negative interpretations in social contexts. Bi-factor latent regression modeling was employed to examine associations between interpretation processes and both the general <em>p</em>-factor of psychopathology (an overarching dimension representing shared variance across disorders) and five HiTOP spectra (internalizing, thought disorder, disinhibited externalizing, antagonistic externalizing, detachment). The <em>p</em>-factor showed significant associations with negative interpretation bias and negative interpretation inflexibility. Reduced positive interpretation bias was uniquely associated with the detachment spectrum, which is characterized by emotional detachment, social disinterest, and avoidance of social relationships. These findings suggest that negatively biased and inflexible interpretations may represent general transdiagnostic risk markers for psychopathology, while reduced positive interpretation bias could be a more specific risk factor for detachment-related conditions. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which inflexible interpretation processes contribute to generalized and spectrum-specific psychopathological risk.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":48457,"journal":{"name":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"193 ","pages":"Article 104845"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are biased and inflexible updating of interpretations broad or narrow transdiagnostic risk markers for psychopathology? A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) lens\",\"authors\":\"Lisa M.W. Vos , Paul Lodder , Michael V. Bronstein , Reuma Gadassi-Polack , Tom Smeets , Jutta Joormann , Jonas Everaert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.brat.2025.104845\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Previous research has linked biased and inflexible interpretations of ambiguous information to various forms of psychopathology. However, existing studies typically investigate these interpretation processes within individual diagnostic categories, overlooking the significant symptom overlap and comorbidity among mental health conditions. Consequently, the extent to which biased and inflexible interpretations represent broad transdiagnostic or more narrowly specific risk factors remains unclear. To address this gap, this study investigated transdiagnostic associations between biased and inflexible interpretation processes and dimensions of psychopathology using the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). HiTOP is a data-driven framework designed to integrate psychopathology symptoms across traditional diagnostic boundaries. A crowdsourced community sample of adults (<em>N</em> = 383) completed a HiTOP self-report battery and the emotional Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence task. This task measures negative and positive interpretation biases, as well as inflexible negative interpretations in social contexts. Bi-factor latent regression modeling was employed to examine associations between interpretation processes and both the general <em>p</em>-factor of psychopathology (an overarching dimension representing shared variance across disorders) and five HiTOP spectra (internalizing, thought disorder, disinhibited externalizing, antagonistic externalizing, detachment). The <em>p</em>-factor showed significant associations with negative interpretation bias and negative interpretation inflexibility. Reduced positive interpretation bias was uniquely associated with the detachment spectrum, which is characterized by emotional detachment, social disinterest, and avoidance of social relationships. These findings suggest that negatively biased and inflexible interpretations may represent general transdiagnostic risk markers for psychopathology, while reduced positive interpretation bias could be a more specific risk factor for detachment-related conditions. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which inflexible interpretation processes contribute to generalized and spectrum-specific psychopathological risk.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48457,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"193 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104845\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001676\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0005796725001676","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, CLINICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are biased and inflexible updating of interpretations broad or narrow transdiagnostic risk markers for psychopathology? A Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP) lens
Previous research has linked biased and inflexible interpretations of ambiguous information to various forms of psychopathology. However, existing studies typically investigate these interpretation processes within individual diagnostic categories, overlooking the significant symptom overlap and comorbidity among mental health conditions. Consequently, the extent to which biased and inflexible interpretations represent broad transdiagnostic or more narrowly specific risk factors remains unclear. To address this gap, this study investigated transdiagnostic associations between biased and inflexible interpretation processes and dimensions of psychopathology using the Hierarchical Taxonomy of Psychopathology (HiTOP). HiTOP is a data-driven framework designed to integrate psychopathology symptoms across traditional diagnostic boundaries. A crowdsourced community sample of adults (N = 383) completed a HiTOP self-report battery and the emotional Bias Against Disconfirmatory Evidence task. This task measures negative and positive interpretation biases, as well as inflexible negative interpretations in social contexts. Bi-factor latent regression modeling was employed to examine associations between interpretation processes and both the general p-factor of psychopathology (an overarching dimension representing shared variance across disorders) and five HiTOP spectra (internalizing, thought disorder, disinhibited externalizing, antagonistic externalizing, detachment). The p-factor showed significant associations with negative interpretation bias and negative interpretation inflexibility. Reduced positive interpretation bias was uniquely associated with the detachment spectrum, which is characterized by emotional detachment, social disinterest, and avoidance of social relationships. These findings suggest that negatively biased and inflexible interpretations may represent general transdiagnostic risk markers for psychopathology, while reduced positive interpretation bias could be a more specific risk factor for detachment-related conditions. Future research should explore the mechanisms through which inflexible interpretation processes contribute to generalized and spectrum-specific psychopathological risk.
期刊介绍:
The major focus of Behaviour Research and Therapy is an experimental psychopathology approach to understanding emotional and behavioral disorders and their prevention and treatment, using cognitive, behavioral, and psychophysiological (including neural) methods and models. This includes laboratory-based experimental studies with healthy, at risk and subclinical individuals that inform clinical application as well as studies with clinically severe samples. The following types of submissions are encouraged: theoretical reviews of mechanisms that contribute to psychopathology and that offer new treatment targets; tests of novel, mechanistically focused psychological interventions, especially ones that include theory-driven or experimentally-derived predictors, moderators and mediators; and innovations in dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices into clinical practice in psychology and associated fields, especially those that target underlying mechanisms or focus on novel approaches to treatment delivery. In addition to traditional psychological disorders, the scope of the journal includes behavioural medicine (e.g., chronic pain). The journal will not consider manuscripts dealing primarily with measurement, psychometric analyses, and personality assessment.