{"title":"在STEM教育中主动学习的人-基因交互:最新的和未来的方向","authors":"Sofie Otto , Rea Lavi , Lykke Brogaard Bertel","doi":"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105444","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This systematic state-of-the-art review synthesizes findings from 50 studies examining the integration of GenAI into active learning models (such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and inquiry-based learning) within STEM education from high school to graduate levels. The analysis identifies five overarching categories of human–GenAI interaction: Tutoring, Co-creating, Processing, Coaching, and Simulating, primarily leveraged to support individual learners in developing problem-solving, critical thinking, and computational thinking skills. While the findings highlight GenAI's potential to support constructivist active learning, its application remains largely individual in scope. Moreover, challenges related to algorithmic bias, information reliability, privacy, and limited domain specificity constrain the orchestration of synergistic human-GenAI interaction, placing significant pedagogical demands on both educators and learners when interacting with GenAI-powered applications. Future research should explore how human-GenAI interactions can be orchestrated to support more active, collaborative, and context-sensitive learning environments. This includes supporting students in developing the competencies necessary to engage, individually and collaboratively, with GenAI tools reflectively, purposefully, and meaningfully in ways that enhance active learning.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":10568,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Education","volume":"239 ","pages":"Article 105444"},"PeriodicalIF":10.5000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Human-GenAI interaction for active learning in STEM education: State-of-the-art and future directions\",\"authors\":\"Sofie Otto , Rea Lavi , Lykke Brogaard Bertel\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compedu.2025.105444\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This systematic state-of-the-art review synthesizes findings from 50 studies examining the integration of GenAI into active learning models (such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and inquiry-based learning) within STEM education from high school to graduate levels. The analysis identifies five overarching categories of human–GenAI interaction: Tutoring, Co-creating, Processing, Coaching, and Simulating, primarily leveraged to support individual learners in developing problem-solving, critical thinking, and computational thinking skills. While the findings highlight GenAI's potential to support constructivist active learning, its application remains largely individual in scope. Moreover, challenges related to algorithmic bias, information reliability, privacy, and limited domain specificity constrain the orchestration of synergistic human-GenAI interaction, placing significant pedagogical demands on both educators and learners when interacting with GenAI-powered applications. Future research should explore how human-GenAI interactions can be orchestrated to support more active, collaborative, and context-sensitive learning environments. This includes supporting students in developing the competencies necessary to engage, individually and collaboratively, with GenAI tools reflectively, purposefully, and meaningfully in ways that enhance active learning.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Education\",\"volume\":\"239 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105444\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"95\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013152500212X\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"教育学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S036013152500212X","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"教育学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Human-GenAI interaction for active learning in STEM education: State-of-the-art and future directions
This systematic state-of-the-art review synthesizes findings from 50 studies examining the integration of GenAI into active learning models (such as problem-based learning, collaborative learning, and inquiry-based learning) within STEM education from high school to graduate levels. The analysis identifies five overarching categories of human–GenAI interaction: Tutoring, Co-creating, Processing, Coaching, and Simulating, primarily leveraged to support individual learners in developing problem-solving, critical thinking, and computational thinking skills. While the findings highlight GenAI's potential to support constructivist active learning, its application remains largely individual in scope. Moreover, challenges related to algorithmic bias, information reliability, privacy, and limited domain specificity constrain the orchestration of synergistic human-GenAI interaction, placing significant pedagogical demands on both educators and learners when interacting with GenAI-powered applications. Future research should explore how human-GenAI interactions can be orchestrated to support more active, collaborative, and context-sensitive learning environments. This includes supporting students in developing the competencies necessary to engage, individually and collaboratively, with GenAI tools reflectively, purposefully, and meaningfully in ways that enhance active learning.
期刊介绍:
Computers & Education seeks to advance understanding of how digital technology can improve education by publishing high-quality research that expands both theory and practice. The journal welcomes research papers exploring the pedagogical applications of digital technology, with a focus broad enough to appeal to the wider education community.