保护数字空间中的女性:对社交媒体上的网络骚扰和物化的法律回应

IF 1.4 3区 经济学 Q2 DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
K. C. Mythili, K. Nagamani
{"title":"保护数字空间中的女性:对社交媒体上的网络骚扰和物化的法律回应","authors":"K. C. Mythili,&nbsp;K. Nagamani","doi":"10.1111/dpr.70039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Motivation</h3>\n \n <p>Digital objectification and cyber bullying are a growing menace in the virtual world, with women bearing the brunt of the harassment and compromising their autonomy, dignity and safety. These harms are exacerbated by patriarchal norms and intersectional disparities (by race, class, and geography) and there is a lack of adequate legal and platform responses.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Purpose</h3>\n \n <p>This research seeks to assess the state of international law that deals with cyber harassment and objectification of digital objects, gaps in enforcement, and gender-sensitive changes. It discusses the ways feminist and intersectional approaches can be used to guide better laws, platform responsibility, and victim safety.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Approach and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Based on a qualitative, comparative legal analysis, the study compares the national and international legislation, such as the EU GDPR, Violence Against Women Act in the U.S., and Information Technology Act in India, as well as the treaties, such as the Budapest Convention. Feminist and intersectional approaches to case studies of high-profile incidents are used to evaluate the systemic failures and good practices.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Findings</h3>\n \n <p>The research shows that there are disjointed and unevenly applied legal safeguards. The most frequent problems are jurisdictional difficulties, insufficient gender-related provisions, poor regulation of the platform, and victim-blaming culture. New forms of online harassment such as deepfakes and non-consensual sharing of images are out-pacing the law. The vulnerability is further exacerbated by intersectional factors, especially women of colour, those identifying as LGBTQ+, and those living in rural or low-income settings.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\n \n <p>The results support the necessity of harmonised, gender-sensitive cyber laws that consider online harms that are specific to women. The recommendations are to create digital consent laws, enhance international collaboration, require platforms to be responsible, enhance law enforcement training, and incorporate survivor-centred practices. The involvement of the global community and cultural transition is critical to the rights and security of women in cyberspace.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51478,"journal":{"name":"Development Policy Review","volume":"43 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safeguarding women in digital spaces: Legal responses to cyber harassment and objectification on social media\",\"authors\":\"K. C. Mythili,&nbsp;K. Nagamani\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/dpr.70039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Motivation</h3>\\n \\n <p>Digital objectification and cyber bullying are a growing menace in the virtual world, with women bearing the brunt of the harassment and compromising their autonomy, dignity and safety. These harms are exacerbated by patriarchal norms and intersectional disparities (by race, class, and geography) and there is a lack of adequate legal and platform responses.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Purpose</h3>\\n \\n <p>This research seeks to assess the state of international law that deals with cyber harassment and objectification of digital objects, gaps in enforcement, and gender-sensitive changes. It discusses the ways feminist and intersectional approaches can be used to guide better laws, platform responsibility, and victim safety.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Approach and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Based on a qualitative, comparative legal analysis, the study compares the national and international legislation, such as the EU GDPR, Violence Against Women Act in the U.S., and Information Technology Act in India, as well as the treaties, such as the Budapest Convention. Feminist and intersectional approaches to case studies of high-profile incidents are used to evaluate the systemic failures and good practices.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Findings</h3>\\n \\n <p>The research shows that there are disjointed and unevenly applied legal safeguards. The most frequent problems are jurisdictional difficulties, insufficient gender-related provisions, poor regulation of the platform, and victim-blaming culture. New forms of online harassment such as deepfakes and non-consensual sharing of images are out-pacing the law. The vulnerability is further exacerbated by intersectional factors, especially women of colour, those identifying as LGBTQ+, and those living in rural or low-income settings.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Policy Implications</h3>\\n \\n <p>The results support the necessity of harmonised, gender-sensitive cyber laws that consider online harms that are specific to women. The recommendations are to create digital consent laws, enhance international collaboration, require platforms to be responsible, enhance law enforcement training, and incorporate survivor-centred practices. The involvement of the global community and cultural transition is critical to the rights and security of women in cyberspace.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"volume\":\"43 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Development Policy Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70039\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Development Policy Review","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/dpr.70039","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"DEVELOPMENT STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

数字物化和网络欺凌是虚拟世界中日益严重的威胁,女性首当其冲受到骚扰,自主权、尊严和安全受到损害。父权规范和交叉差异(种族、阶级和地理)加剧了这些危害,而且缺乏适当的法律和平台回应。本研究旨在评估处理网络骚扰和数字对象物化的国际法现状、执法差距和性别敏感变化。它讨论了如何使用女权主义和交叉方法来指导更好的法律、平台责任和受害者安全。方法和方法基于定性的比较法律分析,本研究比较了国家和国际立法,如欧盟的GDPR、美国的《反妇女暴力法》和印度的《信息技术法》,以及条约,如《布达佩斯公约》。对高调事件的案例研究采用女权主义和交叉方法来评估系统性失败和良好做法。研究表明,法律保障存在脱节和不均衡。最常见的问题是司法困难、与性别相关的规定不足、平台监管不力以及指责受害者的文化。新形式的网络骚扰,如深度伪造和未经同意的图片分享,正在超越法律的步伐。交叉因素进一步加剧了这种脆弱性,尤其是有色人种女性、LGBTQ+群体以及生活在农村或低收入环境中的女性。研究结果支持制定统一的、对性别敏感的网络法律的必要性,这些法律应考虑到针对女性的网络危害。这些建议包括制定数字同意法,加强国际合作,要求平台负责,加强执法培训,并纳入以幸存者为中心的实践。国际社会的参与和文化转型对女性在网络空间的权利和安全至关重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Safeguarding women in digital spaces: Legal responses to cyber harassment and objectification on social media

Motivation

Digital objectification and cyber bullying are a growing menace in the virtual world, with women bearing the brunt of the harassment and compromising their autonomy, dignity and safety. These harms are exacerbated by patriarchal norms and intersectional disparities (by race, class, and geography) and there is a lack of adequate legal and platform responses.

Purpose

This research seeks to assess the state of international law that deals with cyber harassment and objectification of digital objects, gaps in enforcement, and gender-sensitive changes. It discusses the ways feminist and intersectional approaches can be used to guide better laws, platform responsibility, and victim safety.

Approach and Methods

Based on a qualitative, comparative legal analysis, the study compares the national and international legislation, such as the EU GDPR, Violence Against Women Act in the U.S., and Information Technology Act in India, as well as the treaties, such as the Budapest Convention. Feminist and intersectional approaches to case studies of high-profile incidents are used to evaluate the systemic failures and good practices.

Findings

The research shows that there are disjointed and unevenly applied legal safeguards. The most frequent problems are jurisdictional difficulties, insufficient gender-related provisions, poor regulation of the platform, and victim-blaming culture. New forms of online harassment such as deepfakes and non-consensual sharing of images are out-pacing the law. The vulnerability is further exacerbated by intersectional factors, especially women of colour, those identifying as LGBTQ+, and those living in rural or low-income settings.

Policy Implications

The results support the necessity of harmonised, gender-sensitive cyber laws that consider online harms that are specific to women. The recommendations are to create digital consent laws, enhance international collaboration, require platforms to be responsible, enhance law enforcement training, and incorporate survivor-centred practices. The involvement of the global community and cultural transition is critical to the rights and security of women in cyberspace.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Development Policy Review
Development Policy Review DEVELOPMENT STUDIES-
CiteScore
3.50
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Development Policy Review is the refereed journal that makes the crucial links between research and policy in international development. Edited by staff of the Overseas Development Institute, the London-based think-tank on international development and humanitarian issues, it publishes single articles and theme issues on topics at the forefront of current development policy debate. Coverage includes the latest thinking and research on poverty-reduction strategies, inequality and social exclusion, property rights and sustainable livelihoods, globalisation in trade and finance, and the reform of global governance. Informed, rigorous, multi-disciplinary and up-to-the-minute, DPR is an indispensable tool for development researchers and practitioners alike.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信