{"title":"捐助撤回后通过南南伙伴关系重新获得权力和伙伴关系","authors":"Basma Taysir El Doukhi","doi":"10.1111/disa.70009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The recent US foreign assistance cuts represent not only a funding crisis but also a reckoning for the humanitarian and development sectors. This moment must catalyse a shift towards South–South cooperation, partnership and funding ecosystems that are not beholden to the strategic fluctuations of traditional donors. Global North institutions continue to marginalise the knowledge, leadership and capacities of Global South communities; thus, aid needs to be reshaped as solidarity, not charity. This paradigm shift would place communities, civil society and local governments at the centre of decision-making, reclaiming power, dignity and autonomy by local and displaced actors. To make this transition effective, national and local communities and actors must invest in capacity strengthening, inclusive governance models and equitable partnerships. Embracing these practices will not only increase the sustainability of interventions but also uphold the dignity and leadership of those at the frontlines of crisis and humanitarian action. In addition, it is imperative to reform existing aid architectures to reflect new geopolitical and environmental realities.</p>","PeriodicalId":48088,"journal":{"name":"Disasters","volume":"49 4","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.70009","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Reclaiming Power and Partnerships in the Wake of Donor Retraction through South–South Partnership\",\"authors\":\"Basma Taysir El Doukhi\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/disa.70009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The recent US foreign assistance cuts represent not only a funding crisis but also a reckoning for the humanitarian and development sectors. This moment must catalyse a shift towards South–South cooperation, partnership and funding ecosystems that are not beholden to the strategic fluctuations of traditional donors. Global North institutions continue to marginalise the knowledge, leadership and capacities of Global South communities; thus, aid needs to be reshaped as solidarity, not charity. This paradigm shift would place communities, civil society and local governments at the centre of decision-making, reclaiming power, dignity and autonomy by local and displaced actors. To make this transition effective, national and local communities and actors must invest in capacity strengthening, inclusive governance models and equitable partnerships. Embracing these practices will not only increase the sustainability of interventions but also uphold the dignity and leadership of those at the frontlines of crisis and humanitarian action. In addition, it is imperative to reform existing aid architectures to reflect new geopolitical and environmental realities.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48088,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Disasters\",\"volume\":\"49 4\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/disa.70009\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Disasters\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70009\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Disasters","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/disa.70009","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Reclaiming Power and Partnerships in the Wake of Donor Retraction through South–South Partnership
The recent US foreign assistance cuts represent not only a funding crisis but also a reckoning for the humanitarian and development sectors. This moment must catalyse a shift towards South–South cooperation, partnership and funding ecosystems that are not beholden to the strategic fluctuations of traditional donors. Global North institutions continue to marginalise the knowledge, leadership and capacities of Global South communities; thus, aid needs to be reshaped as solidarity, not charity. This paradigm shift would place communities, civil society and local governments at the centre of decision-making, reclaiming power, dignity and autonomy by local and displaced actors. To make this transition effective, national and local communities and actors must invest in capacity strengthening, inclusive governance models and equitable partnerships. Embracing these practices will not only increase the sustainability of interventions but also uphold the dignity and leadership of those at the frontlines of crisis and humanitarian action. In addition, it is imperative to reform existing aid architectures to reflect new geopolitical and environmental realities.
期刊介绍:
Disasters is a major, peer-reviewed quarterly journal reporting on all aspects of disaster studies, policy and management. It provides a forum for academics, policymakers and practitioners to publish high-quality research and practice concerning natural catastrophes, anthropogenic disasters, complex political emergencies and protracted crises around the world. The journal promotes the interchange of ideas and experience, maintaining a balance between field reports, case study articles of general interest and academic papers. Disasters: Is the leading journal in the field of disasters, protracted crises and complex emergencies Influences disaster prevention, mitigation and response policies and practices Adopts a world-wide geographical perspective Contains a mix of academic papers and field studies Promotes the interchange of ideas between practitioners, policy-makers and academics.