Norma Patricia Silva-Beltran, Stephanie A. Boone, Jon Q. Lehman, Justin T. Clark, Nick Duane Betts-Childress, Charles P. Gerba, M. Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly R. Bright
{"title":"有机酸和植物精油的杀病毒效果","authors":"Norma Patricia Silva-Beltran, Stephanie A. Boone, Jon Q. Lehman, Justin T. Clark, Nick Duane Betts-Childress, Charles P. Gerba, M. Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly R. Bright","doi":"10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Currently, the predominant commercially available disinfectants and sanitizers are formulated with active ingredients including alcohol, halogenated compounds (e.g., sodium hypochlorite), surfactants, oxidizing agents (eg., hydrogen peroxide), and quaternary ammonium compounds. Natural products represent an alternative since they are often effective microbicides and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) due to their long history of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several organic acids and plant essential oils against three bacteriophages (MS2, ΦX174, PR772) with different genome characteristics (e.g., RNA versus DNA, single-stranded versus double-stranded) and against an enveloped and non-enveloped mammalian virus (human coronavirus 229E and feline calicivirus, respectively). The active components of essential oils (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, thymol) and organic acids (acetic, salicylic, tartaric) demonstrated virucidal activity against the three bacteriophages (typically 1.00 log<sub>10</sub> to > 5.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within 10 min); however, ΦX174 exhibited lesser susceptibility (< 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> reduction with all but salicylic acid) and PR772 was the most resistant to cinnamaldehyde. It is unclear why ΦX174, a ssDNA virus, was more resistant to these antimicrobials than the ssRNA (MS2) and dsDNA (PR772) viruses. Carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol were also highly effective against both mammalian viruses (≥ 1.49 and > 3.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within one and 10 min, respectively). Salicylic acid was the most effective antimicrobial tested with > 3.84 log<sub>10</sub> reductions observed with all the viruses in one minute. Based on these results, several of the organic acids and essential oil components included appear to be viable eco-friendly alternatives to currently used disinfectants/sanitizers that are effective against viruses possessing diverse genomic and morphological characteristics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":563,"journal":{"name":"Food and Environmental Virology","volume":"17 3","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Virucidal Efficacy of Organic Acids and Plant Essential Oils\",\"authors\":\"Norma Patricia Silva-Beltran, Stephanie A. Boone, Jon Q. Lehman, Justin T. Clark, Nick Duane Betts-Childress, Charles P. Gerba, M. Khalid Ijaz, Julie McKinney, Kelly R. Bright\",\"doi\":\"10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Currently, the predominant commercially available disinfectants and sanitizers are formulated with active ingredients including alcohol, halogenated compounds (e.g., sodium hypochlorite), surfactants, oxidizing agents (eg., hydrogen peroxide), and quaternary ammonium compounds. Natural products represent an alternative since they are often effective microbicides and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) due to their long history of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several organic acids and plant essential oils against three bacteriophages (MS2, ΦX174, PR772) with different genome characteristics (e.g., RNA versus DNA, single-stranded versus double-stranded) and against an enveloped and non-enveloped mammalian virus (human coronavirus 229E and feline calicivirus, respectively). The active components of essential oils (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, thymol) and organic acids (acetic, salicylic, tartaric) demonstrated virucidal activity against the three bacteriophages (typically 1.00 log<sub>10</sub> to > 5.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within 10 min); however, ΦX174 exhibited lesser susceptibility (< 1.0 log<sub>10</sub> reduction with all but salicylic acid) and PR772 was the most resistant to cinnamaldehyde. It is unclear why ΦX174, a ssDNA virus, was more resistant to these antimicrobials than the ssRNA (MS2) and dsDNA (PR772) viruses. Carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol were also highly effective against both mammalian viruses (≥ 1.49 and > 3.00 log<sub>10</sub> reductions within one and 10 min, respectively). Salicylic acid was the most effective antimicrobial tested with > 3.84 log<sub>10</sub> reductions observed with all the viruses in one minute. Based on these results, several of the organic acids and essential oil components included appear to be viable eco-friendly alternatives to currently used disinfectants/sanitizers that are effective against viruses possessing diverse genomic and morphological characteristics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"volume\":\"17 3\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food and Environmental Virology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food and Environmental Virology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s12560-025-09660-4","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Virucidal Efficacy of Organic Acids and Plant Essential Oils
Currently, the predominant commercially available disinfectants and sanitizers are formulated with active ingredients including alcohol, halogenated compounds (e.g., sodium hypochlorite), surfactants, oxidizing agents (eg., hydrogen peroxide), and quaternary ammonium compounds. Natural products represent an alternative since they are often effective microbicides and are generally recognized as safe (GRAS) due to their long history of use. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of several organic acids and plant essential oils against three bacteriophages (MS2, ΦX174, PR772) with different genome characteristics (e.g., RNA versus DNA, single-stranded versus double-stranded) and against an enveloped and non-enveloped mammalian virus (human coronavirus 229E and feline calicivirus, respectively). The active components of essential oils (carvacrol, cinnamaldehyde, eugenol, thymol) and organic acids (acetic, salicylic, tartaric) demonstrated virucidal activity against the three bacteriophages (typically 1.00 log10 to > 5.00 log10 reductions within 10 min); however, ΦX174 exhibited lesser susceptibility (< 1.0 log10 reduction with all but salicylic acid) and PR772 was the most resistant to cinnamaldehyde. It is unclear why ΦX174, a ssDNA virus, was more resistant to these antimicrobials than the ssRNA (MS2) and dsDNA (PR772) viruses. Carvacrol, eugenol, and thymol were also highly effective against both mammalian viruses (≥ 1.49 and > 3.00 log10 reductions within one and 10 min, respectively). Salicylic acid was the most effective antimicrobial tested with > 3.84 log10 reductions observed with all the viruses in one minute. Based on these results, several of the organic acids and essential oil components included appear to be viable eco-friendly alternatives to currently used disinfectants/sanitizers that are effective against viruses possessing diverse genomic and morphological characteristics.
期刊介绍:
Food and Environmental Virology publishes original articles, notes and review articles on any aspect relating to the transmission of pathogenic viruses via the environment (water, air, soil etc.) and foods. This includes epidemiological studies, identification of novel or emerging pathogens, methods of analysis or characterisation, studies on survival and elimination, and development of procedural controls for industrial processes, e.g. HACCP plans. The journal will cover all aspects of this important area, and encompass studies on any human, animal, and plant pathogenic virus which is capable of transmission via the environment or food.