{"title":"优化离散损耗(ODIL)的流体流速测量降噪和超分辨率","authors":"Stephen Terrington, Mark Thompson, Kerry Hourigan","doi":"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109988","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>This article presents a comparison between two techniques – optimising a discrete loss (ODIL) and physics informed neural networks (PINN) – for reconstructing the velocity field from low resolution and noisy planar PIV measurements. Both techniques are capable of accurately reconstructing the velocity and pressure fields from low resolution and noisy velocity measurements sampled from 2D numerical simulations. Both techniques provide reasonable reconstruction of the in-plane velocity components when provided with two-component velocity measurements in a single plane sampled from a 3D numerical simulation. However, ODIL generally over-fits to any noise in the measurement data, and therefore PINN achieves higher accuracy. While PINN can achieve a reconstruction more accurate than that of ODIL, PINN converges much slower than ODIL, requiring substantially more training epochs and walltime to produce results of similar accuracy to ODIL. Both methods are superior to statistical noise reduction approaches, such as low-pass filtering.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":335,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","volume":"117 ","pages":"Article 109988"},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"De-noising and super-resolution of fluid-flow velocity measurements by optimising a discrete loss (ODIL)\",\"authors\":\"Stephen Terrington, Mark Thompson, Kerry Hourigan\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.ijheatfluidflow.2025.109988\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>This article presents a comparison between two techniques – optimising a discrete loss (ODIL) and physics informed neural networks (PINN) – for reconstructing the velocity field from low resolution and noisy planar PIV measurements. Both techniques are capable of accurately reconstructing the velocity and pressure fields from low resolution and noisy velocity measurements sampled from 2D numerical simulations. Both techniques provide reasonable reconstruction of the in-plane velocity components when provided with two-component velocity measurements in a single plane sampled from a 3D numerical simulation. However, ODIL generally over-fits to any noise in the measurement data, and therefore PINN achieves higher accuracy. While PINN can achieve a reconstruction more accurate than that of ODIL, PINN converges much slower than ODIL, requiring substantially more training epochs and walltime to produce results of similar accuracy to ODIL. Both methods are superior to statistical noise reduction approaches, such as low-pass filtering.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":335,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"volume\":\"117 \",\"pages\":\"Article 109988\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25002462\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0142727X25002462","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MECHANICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
De-noising and super-resolution of fluid-flow velocity measurements by optimising a discrete loss (ODIL)
This article presents a comparison between two techniques – optimising a discrete loss (ODIL) and physics informed neural networks (PINN) – for reconstructing the velocity field from low resolution and noisy planar PIV measurements. Both techniques are capable of accurately reconstructing the velocity and pressure fields from low resolution and noisy velocity measurements sampled from 2D numerical simulations. Both techniques provide reasonable reconstruction of the in-plane velocity components when provided with two-component velocity measurements in a single plane sampled from a 3D numerical simulation. However, ODIL generally over-fits to any noise in the measurement data, and therefore PINN achieves higher accuracy. While PINN can achieve a reconstruction more accurate than that of ODIL, PINN converges much slower than ODIL, requiring substantially more training epochs and walltime to produce results of similar accuracy to ODIL. Both methods are superior to statistical noise reduction approaches, such as low-pass filtering.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Heat and Fluid Flow welcomes high-quality original contributions on experimental, computational, and physical aspects of convective heat transfer and fluid dynamics relevant to engineering or the environment, including multiphase and microscale flows.
Papers reporting the application of these disciplines to design and development, with emphasis on new technological fields, are also welcomed. Some of these new fields include microscale electronic and mechanical systems; medical and biological systems; and thermal and flow control in both the internal and external environment.