{"title":"一种新的髋臼损伤模式:无皮质受累的后骨软骨嵌塞","authors":"Mahmoud Fahmy, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky","doi":"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112724","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acetabular fractures typically involve disruption of cortical columns or walls and are well-classified by Judet, Letournel, and AO/OTA systems. However, some injuries involve pure osteochondral impaction of the articular surface without cortical involvement, making them difficult to detect and unclassified by current systems. This study identifies and evaluates a rare, previously undescribed acetabular injury pattern—posterior dome osteochondral impaction without cortical fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To characterize this unique injury pattern and assess clinical and radiological outcomes following two surgical techniques aimed at anatomical restoration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted on eight patients (six males, two females; mean age 34 years) treated at a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included isolated posterior dome osteochondral impaction confirmed by computed tomography, absence of cortical disruption, and minimum six months follow-up. Patients underwent surgical management via either posterior wall osteotomy or a cortical window technique, with subchondral support provided by autologous bone graft or rafting screws. Functional outcomes were measured using the Modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. Radiological results were assessed according to Matta criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All injuries followed high-energy trauma, predominantly motor vehicle collisions. Posterior wall osteotomy was performed in five patients: cortical window technique in three. Anatomical reduction was achieved and confirmed radiologically in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, no evidence of secondary collapse, hardware failure, or early osteoarthritis was noted. Functional outcomes were excellent in five patients and good in three (mean Merle d’Aubigné score 16.4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Isolated osteochondral impaction of the posterior acetabular dome without cortical fracture is a distinct injury not encompassed by current classification systems. Surgical intervention using posterior wall osteotomy or cortical window elevation facilitates anatomical reduction and yields excellent mid-term outcomes. Recognition of this lesion and its inclusion in future acetabular fracture classifications are essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":54978,"journal":{"name":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","volume":"56 11","pages":"Article 112724"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A novel acetabular injury pattern: Posterior osteochondral impaction without cortical involvement\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Fahmy, Mostafa Ahmed Shawky\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.injury.2025.112724\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>Acetabular fractures typically involve disruption of cortical columns or walls and are well-classified by Judet, Letournel, and AO/OTA systems. However, some injuries involve pure osteochondral impaction of the articular surface without cortical involvement, making them difficult to detect and unclassified by current systems. This study identifies and evaluates a rare, previously undescribed acetabular injury pattern—posterior dome osteochondral impaction without cortical fracture.</div></div><div><h3>Aim</h3><div>To characterize this unique injury pattern and assess clinical and radiological outcomes following two surgical techniques aimed at anatomical restoration.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>A retrospective review was conducted on eight patients (six males, two females; mean age 34 years) treated at a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included isolated posterior dome osteochondral impaction confirmed by computed tomography, absence of cortical disruption, and minimum six months follow-up. Patients underwent surgical management via either posterior wall osteotomy or a cortical window technique, with subchondral support provided by autologous bone graft or rafting screws. Functional outcomes were measured using the Modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. Radiological results were assessed according to Matta criteria.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>All injuries followed high-energy trauma, predominantly motor vehicle collisions. Posterior wall osteotomy was performed in five patients: cortical window technique in three. Anatomical reduction was achieved and confirmed radiologically in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, no evidence of secondary collapse, hardware failure, or early osteoarthritis was noted. Functional outcomes were excellent in five patients and good in three (mean Merle d’Aubigné score 16.4).</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>Isolated osteochondral impaction of the posterior acetabular dome without cortical fracture is a distinct injury not encompassed by current classification systems. Surgical intervention using posterior wall osteotomy or cortical window elevation facilitates anatomical reduction and yields excellent mid-term outcomes. Recognition of this lesion and its inclusion in future acetabular fracture classifications are essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54978,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"volume\":\"56 11\",\"pages\":\"Article 112724\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005820\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Injury-International Journal of the Care of the Injured","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0020138325005820","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
髋臼骨折通常涉及皮质柱或壁的破坏,并被Judet、Letournel和AO/OTA系统很好地分类。然而,一些损伤仅涉及关节表面的骨软骨撞击而未涉及皮质,这使得它们难以被现有系统检测和分类。本研究确定并评估了一种罕见的、先前未被描述的髋臼损伤模式——无皮质骨折的后穹窿骨软骨嵌塞。目的描述这种独特的损伤模式,并评估两种旨在解剖修复的手术技术的临床和影像学结果。方法回顾性分析2008 - 2023年在某三级转诊中心就诊的8例患者(6男2女,平均年龄34岁)。纳入标准包括经计算机断层扫描证实的孤立性后穹窿骨软骨嵌塞,无皮质破裂,至少随访6个月。患者通过后壁截骨术或皮质窗技术进行手术治疗,并通过自体骨移植物或漂流螺钉提供软骨下支持。功能结果采用改良Merle d ' aubign和Postel评分进行测量。放射学结果根据Matta标准进行评估。结果所有损伤均为高能外伤,以机动车碰撞为主。后壁截骨术5例,皮质窗术3例。所有病例均获得解剖复位并经放射学证实。在平均12个月的随访中,没有发现继发性塌陷、硬件故障或早期骨关节炎的证据。5例患者的功能预后良好,3例良好(平均莫尔评分16.4)。结论无皮质骨折的髋臼后穹窿孤立性骨软骨嵌塞是一种独特的损伤,目前的分类系统尚未涵盖。手术干预采用后壁截骨术或皮质窗提升术促进解剖复位并获得良好的中期预后。认识这种病变并将其纳入未来髋臼骨折分类对于准确诊断和最佳治疗至关重要。
A novel acetabular injury pattern: Posterior osteochondral impaction without cortical involvement
Introduction
Acetabular fractures typically involve disruption of cortical columns or walls and are well-classified by Judet, Letournel, and AO/OTA systems. However, some injuries involve pure osteochondral impaction of the articular surface without cortical involvement, making them difficult to detect and unclassified by current systems. This study identifies and evaluates a rare, previously undescribed acetabular injury pattern—posterior dome osteochondral impaction without cortical fracture.
Aim
To characterize this unique injury pattern and assess clinical and radiological outcomes following two surgical techniques aimed at anatomical restoration.
Methods
A retrospective review was conducted on eight patients (six males, two females; mean age 34 years) treated at a tertiary referral center between 2008 and 2023. Inclusion criteria included isolated posterior dome osteochondral impaction confirmed by computed tomography, absence of cortical disruption, and minimum six months follow-up. Patients underwent surgical management via either posterior wall osteotomy or a cortical window technique, with subchondral support provided by autologous bone graft or rafting screws. Functional outcomes were measured using the Modified Merle d’Aubigné and Postel score. Radiological results were assessed according to Matta criteria.
Results
All injuries followed high-energy trauma, predominantly motor vehicle collisions. Posterior wall osteotomy was performed in five patients: cortical window technique in three. Anatomical reduction was achieved and confirmed radiologically in all cases. At a mean follow-up of 12 months, no evidence of secondary collapse, hardware failure, or early osteoarthritis was noted. Functional outcomes were excellent in five patients and good in three (mean Merle d’Aubigné score 16.4).
Conclusion
Isolated osteochondral impaction of the posterior acetabular dome without cortical fracture is a distinct injury not encompassed by current classification systems. Surgical intervention using posterior wall osteotomy or cortical window elevation facilitates anatomical reduction and yields excellent mid-term outcomes. Recognition of this lesion and its inclusion in future acetabular fracture classifications are essential for accurate diagnosis and optimal treatment.
期刊介绍:
Injury was founded in 1969 and is an international journal dealing with all aspects of trauma care and accident surgery. Our primary aim is to facilitate the exchange of ideas, techniques and information among all members of the trauma team.