{"title":"植物性牛奶是独特的产品还是乳制品的替代品?一项关于消费者对植物性和乳制品的认知、使用和消费动机的研究","authors":"Christy Alsado, Lingyun Chen, Wendy Wismer","doi":"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Plant-based milks (PBMs) are positioned as dairy alternatives, yet consumer perception and sensory issues are barriers to acceptance. This study aimed to characterize milks based on sensory attributes, perceptions, and uses, and to determine dairy consumption motivations of consumers of both plant-based and dairy milks. Dairy, oat, pea, and blended milks (<em>n</em> = 12) were evaluated by consumers (<em>n</em> = 109) for overall liking (9-point hedonic scale), sensory attributes (Rate-All-That-Apply), perceptions and uses (Check-All-That-Apply), and dairy consumption motivation based on factors ‘Natural,’ ‘Need,’ ‘Normal,’ and ‘Nice.’ Dairy and oat milks were liked significantly more than pea milks and blends, generating two consumer clusters: dairy-oat-highlikers (high liking for dairy and oat milk) and dairy-plant-modlikers (moderate liking for dairy and specific plant-based milks). ‘Sweet,’ ‘smooth,’ and ‘creamy’ were identified as drivers of liking through Principal Component Analysis and Multifactor Analysis, respectively. Moreover, ‘simple,’ ‘traditional,’ ‘comforting,’ and varied product uses were correlated with most liked milks and associated with mean liking increase in Penalty Analysis. A key study finding was that plant-based milk consumers continued to consume dairy milk because of the perceived ‘Need’ for it (<em>p</em> <em><</em> <em>0.0001</em>)<em>.</em> Subsequently, ‘Need’ was a prevalent consumption motivation across consumer clusters, regardless of varying degrees of liking for both plant-based and dairy milk. This study provides relevant consumer insights into the drivers of liking of PBMs and perceived ‘Need’ for dairy consumption. In developing PBMs, the aim may not be to replicate milk, but to shift focus on enhancing three key sensory attributes and creating a simpler product with more uses.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":322,"journal":{"name":"Food Quality and Preference","volume":"134 ","pages":"Article 105681"},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Are plant-based milks unique products or dairy milk substitutes? A study of consumer perceptions, uses, and consumption motivations of plant-based and dairy milks\",\"authors\":\"Christy Alsado, Lingyun Chen, Wendy Wismer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.foodqual.2025.105681\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Plant-based milks (PBMs) are positioned as dairy alternatives, yet consumer perception and sensory issues are barriers to acceptance. This study aimed to characterize milks based on sensory attributes, perceptions, and uses, and to determine dairy consumption motivations of consumers of both plant-based and dairy milks. Dairy, oat, pea, and blended milks (<em>n</em> = 12) were evaluated by consumers (<em>n</em> = 109) for overall liking (9-point hedonic scale), sensory attributes (Rate-All-That-Apply), perceptions and uses (Check-All-That-Apply), and dairy consumption motivation based on factors ‘Natural,’ ‘Need,’ ‘Normal,’ and ‘Nice.’ Dairy and oat milks were liked significantly more than pea milks and blends, generating two consumer clusters: dairy-oat-highlikers (high liking for dairy and oat milk) and dairy-plant-modlikers (moderate liking for dairy and specific plant-based milks). ‘Sweet,’ ‘smooth,’ and ‘creamy’ were identified as drivers of liking through Principal Component Analysis and Multifactor Analysis, respectively. Moreover, ‘simple,’ ‘traditional,’ ‘comforting,’ and varied product uses were correlated with most liked milks and associated with mean liking increase in Penalty Analysis. A key study finding was that plant-based milk consumers continued to consume dairy milk because of the perceived ‘Need’ for it (<em>p</em> <em><</em> <em>0.0001</em>)<em>.</em> Subsequently, ‘Need’ was a prevalent consumption motivation across consumer clusters, regardless of varying degrees of liking for both plant-based and dairy milk. This study provides relevant consumer insights into the drivers of liking of PBMs and perceived ‘Need’ for dairy consumption. In developing PBMs, the aim may not be to replicate milk, but to shift focus on enhancing three key sensory attributes and creating a simpler product with more uses.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":322,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"volume\":\"134 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105681\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Quality and Preference\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002563\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Quality and Preference","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0950329325002563","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Are plant-based milks unique products or dairy milk substitutes? A study of consumer perceptions, uses, and consumption motivations of plant-based and dairy milks
Plant-based milks (PBMs) are positioned as dairy alternatives, yet consumer perception and sensory issues are barriers to acceptance. This study aimed to characterize milks based on sensory attributes, perceptions, and uses, and to determine dairy consumption motivations of consumers of both plant-based and dairy milks. Dairy, oat, pea, and blended milks (n = 12) were evaluated by consumers (n = 109) for overall liking (9-point hedonic scale), sensory attributes (Rate-All-That-Apply), perceptions and uses (Check-All-That-Apply), and dairy consumption motivation based on factors ‘Natural,’ ‘Need,’ ‘Normal,’ and ‘Nice.’ Dairy and oat milks were liked significantly more than pea milks and blends, generating two consumer clusters: dairy-oat-highlikers (high liking for dairy and oat milk) and dairy-plant-modlikers (moderate liking for dairy and specific plant-based milks). ‘Sweet,’ ‘smooth,’ and ‘creamy’ were identified as drivers of liking through Principal Component Analysis and Multifactor Analysis, respectively. Moreover, ‘simple,’ ‘traditional,’ ‘comforting,’ and varied product uses were correlated with most liked milks and associated with mean liking increase in Penalty Analysis. A key study finding was that plant-based milk consumers continued to consume dairy milk because of the perceived ‘Need’ for it (p<0.0001). Subsequently, ‘Need’ was a prevalent consumption motivation across consumer clusters, regardless of varying degrees of liking for both plant-based and dairy milk. This study provides relevant consumer insights into the drivers of liking of PBMs and perceived ‘Need’ for dairy consumption. In developing PBMs, the aim may not be to replicate milk, but to shift focus on enhancing three key sensory attributes and creating a simpler product with more uses.
期刊介绍:
Food Quality and Preference is a journal devoted to sensory, consumer and behavioural research in food and non-food products. It publishes original research, critical reviews, and short communications in sensory and consumer science, and sensometrics. In addition, the journal publishes special invited issues on important timely topics and from relevant conferences. These are aimed at bridging the gap between research and application, bringing together authors and readers in consumer and market research, sensory science, sensometrics and sensory evaluation, nutrition and food choice, as well as food research, product development and sensory quality assurance. Submissions to Food Quality and Preference are limited to papers that include some form of human measurement; papers that are limited to physical/chemical measures or the routine application of sensory, consumer or econometric analysis will not be considered unless they specifically make a novel scientific contribution in line with the journal''s coverage as outlined below.