Arefin Ittesafun Abian , Sami Azam , David Ompong , Deepika Mathur
{"title":"太阳能光伏板材料生命周期和可持续性的综合综述","authors":"Arefin Ittesafun Abian , Sami Azam , David Ompong , Deepika Mathur","doi":"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113927","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels due to their low carbon emissions and renewability. This survey followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods and proposed five research questions (RQs) to identify sustainable raw material extraction and refinement methods in solar PV technologies. It aimed to determine the best-performing PV systems regarding energy consumption, energy payback time (EPBT), and global warming potential (GWP/CO<sub>2</sub> emissions) across generations, as well as the most efficient PV systems for outdoor use. RQ1 presented environmentally friendly raw material extraction and refinement techniques, such as glycine leaching and ionic liquids, in line with Life Cycle Assessment principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12. RQ2 indicated that single-crystalline silicon (SC-Si) (19 to 48 GJ/kW), gallium arsenide (GaAs) (10 to 20 GJ/kW), and concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) (4.3 to 13 GJ/kW) had the highest energy demands. RQ3 found that SC-Si (1–4 years), copper indium selenide (1.87–9.44 years), and organic PV cells (0.2–4 years) had the longest EPBTs. RQ4 identified the highest GWP in SC-Si (40 to 60 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh), GaAs (40 to 70 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh), and perovskite solar cells (20 to 60 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh). RQ5 showed that CPV technology had the highest outdoor efficiency at 33 %. After a thorough review, we proposed future research directions, including a list of recyclables, reusable, and disposable materials to enhance PV sustainability, evaluating energy consumption across additional life cycle stages, and developing methods to extend panel lifespan, reduce replacements, and<!--> <!-->minimize<!--> <!-->waste.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":428,"journal":{"name":"Solar Energy","volume":"301 ","pages":"Article 113927"},"PeriodicalIF":6.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comprehensive review of the material life cycle and sustainability of solar photovoltaic panels\",\"authors\":\"Arefin Ittesafun Abian , Sami Azam , David Ompong , Deepika Mathur\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.solener.2025.113927\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels due to their low carbon emissions and renewability. This survey followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods and proposed five research questions (RQs) to identify sustainable raw material extraction and refinement methods in solar PV technologies. It aimed to determine the best-performing PV systems regarding energy consumption, energy payback time (EPBT), and global warming potential (GWP/CO<sub>2</sub> emissions) across generations, as well as the most efficient PV systems for outdoor use. RQ1 presented environmentally friendly raw material extraction and refinement techniques, such as glycine leaching and ionic liquids, in line with Life Cycle Assessment principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12. RQ2 indicated that single-crystalline silicon (SC-Si) (19 to 48 GJ/kW), gallium arsenide (GaAs) (10 to 20 GJ/kW), and concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) (4.3 to 13 GJ/kW) had the highest energy demands. RQ3 found that SC-Si (1–4 years), copper indium selenide (1.87–9.44 years), and organic PV cells (0.2–4 years) had the longest EPBTs. RQ4 identified the highest GWP in SC-Si (40 to 60 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh), GaAs (40 to 70 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh), and perovskite solar cells (20 to 60 g CO<sub>2</sub>-eq/kWh). RQ5 showed that CPV technology had the highest outdoor efficiency at 33 %. After a thorough review, we proposed future research directions, including a list of recyclables, reusable, and disposable materials to enhance PV sustainability, evaluating energy consumption across additional life cycle stages, and developing methods to extend panel lifespan, reduce replacements, and<!--> <!-->minimize<!--> <!-->waste.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Solar Energy\",\"volume\":\"301 \",\"pages\":\"Article 113927\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Solar Energy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25006905\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENERGY & FUELS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Solar Energy","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038092X25006905","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENERGY & FUELS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
光伏(PV)系统由于其低碳排放和可再生性,为化石燃料提供了一种可持续的替代品。该调查遵循了系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(PRISMA)方法,并提出了五个研究问题(RQs),以确定太阳能光伏技术中可持续的原材料提取和精炼方法。它旨在确定在能源消耗、能源回收期(EPBT)和全球变暖潜能值(GWP/CO2排放量)方面表现最佳的光伏系统,以及最有效的户外光伏系统。RQ1介绍了符合生命周期评估原则和可持续发展目标12的环境友好型原料提取和精制技术,如甘氨酸浸出和离子液体。RQ2表明,单晶硅(SC-Si) (19 ~ 48 GJ/kW)、砷化镓(GaAs) (10 ~ 20 GJ/kW)和聚光光伏(CPV) (4.3 ~ 13 GJ/kW)的能量需求最高。RQ3发现SC-Si(1-4年)、硒化铜铟(1.87-9.44年)和有机PV电池(0.2-4年)的epbt最长。RQ4发现SC-Si (40 ~ 60 g CO2-eq/kWh)、GaAs (40 ~ 70 g CO2-eq/kWh)和钙钛矿太阳能电池(20 ~ 60 g CO2-eq/kWh)的GWP最高。RQ5显示CPV技术的室外效率最高,为33%。经过全面审查,我们提出了未来的研究方向,包括可回收、可重复使用和一次性材料的清单,以提高光伏的可持续性,评估额外生命周期阶段的能源消耗,以及开发延长面板寿命、减少更换和最大限度减少浪费的方法。
Comprehensive review of the material life cycle and sustainability of solar photovoltaic panels
Photovoltaic (PV) systems provide a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels due to their low carbon emissions and renewability. This survey followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methods and proposed five research questions (RQs) to identify sustainable raw material extraction and refinement methods in solar PV technologies. It aimed to determine the best-performing PV systems regarding energy consumption, energy payback time (EPBT), and global warming potential (GWP/CO2 emissions) across generations, as well as the most efficient PV systems for outdoor use. RQ1 presented environmentally friendly raw material extraction and refinement techniques, such as glycine leaching and ionic liquids, in line with Life Cycle Assessment principles and Sustainable Development Goal 12. RQ2 indicated that single-crystalline silicon (SC-Si) (19 to 48 GJ/kW), gallium arsenide (GaAs) (10 to 20 GJ/kW), and concentrated photovoltaics (CPV) (4.3 to 13 GJ/kW) had the highest energy demands. RQ3 found that SC-Si (1–4 years), copper indium selenide (1.87–9.44 years), and organic PV cells (0.2–4 years) had the longest EPBTs. RQ4 identified the highest GWP in SC-Si (40 to 60 g CO2-eq/kWh), GaAs (40 to 70 g CO2-eq/kWh), and perovskite solar cells (20 to 60 g CO2-eq/kWh). RQ5 showed that CPV technology had the highest outdoor efficiency at 33 %. After a thorough review, we proposed future research directions, including a list of recyclables, reusable, and disposable materials to enhance PV sustainability, evaluating energy consumption across additional life cycle stages, and developing methods to extend panel lifespan, reduce replacements, and minimize waste.
期刊介绍:
Solar Energy welcomes manuscripts presenting information not previously published in journals on any aspect of solar energy research, development, application, measurement or policy. The term "solar energy" in this context includes the indirect uses such as wind energy and biomass