褐藻的化学成分及其化学分类意义

IF 2 4区生物学 Q4 BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology Pub Date : 2025-08-30 DOI:10.1016/j.bse.2025.105118

Xin-Xin Liang , Ming-Hao Mao , Si-Cheng Jin , Jia-Yi Zhang , Lei Wu , Jiao-Ying Qu , Jiao-Jiao Pan , Xiang-Guo Meng

{"title":"褐藻的化学成分及其化学分类意义","authors":"Xin-Xin Liang , Ming-Hao Mao , Si-Cheng Jin , Jia-Yi Zhang , Lei Wu , Jiao-Ying Qu , Jiao-Jiao Pan , Xiang-Guo Meng","doi":"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105118","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>A phytochemical investigation of Alchornea rugosa resulted in the isolation of one stilbene glycoside (1), four megastigmane-type sesquiterpenes (2–5), nine flavonoids (6–14) and four phenols (15–18). These compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic methods and comparing their data to those reported in the literature. Among them, compounds 1, 2, and 12–15 were first isolated from Euphorbiaceae family. Compounds 3–6, 8, 11, and 18 were initially obtained from the genus Alchornea, while compounds 7, 9, 10, 16, and 17 have not been previously isolated from this species. In addition, the chemotaxonomic significance of the isolated compounds was discussed.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":8799,"journal":{"name":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","volume":"123 ","pages":"Article 105118"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chemical constituents of Alchornea rugosa and their chemotaxonomic significance\",\"authors\":\"Xin-Xin Liang , Ming-Hao Mao , Si-Cheng Jin , Jia-Yi Zhang , Lei Wu , Jiao-Ying Qu , Jiao-Jiao Pan , Xiang-Guo Meng\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.bse.2025.105118\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>A phytochemical investigation of Alchornea rugosa resulted in the isolation of one stilbene glycoside (1), four megastigmane-type sesquiterpenes (2–5), nine flavonoids (6–14) and four phenols (15–18). These compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic methods and comparing their data to those reported in the literature. Among them, compounds 1, 2, and 12–15 were first isolated from Euphorbiaceae family. Compounds 3–6, 8, 11, and 18 were initially obtained from the genus Alchornea, while compounds 7, 9, 10, 16, and 17 have not been previously isolated from this species. In addition, the chemotaxonomic significance of the isolated compounds was discussed.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":8799,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"volume\":\"123 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105118\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030519782500167X\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biochemical Systematics and Ecology","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S030519782500167X","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

从褐藻中分离出1个二苯乙烯苷(1)、4个大芪甲素型倍半萜（2-5）、9个黄酮类（6-14）和4个酚类（15-18）。这些化合物用光谱方法进行了鉴定，并与文献报道的数据进行了比较。其中化合物1、2、12 ~ 15为首次从大戟科中分离得到。化合物3 ~ 6、8、11、18为首次从该属植物中分离得到，化合物7、9、10、16、17为首次从该植物中分离得到。此外，还讨论了分离化合物的化学分类意义。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

Chemical constituents of Alchornea rugosa and their chemotaxonomic significance

查看原文本刊更多论文

Chemical constituents of Alchornea rugosa and their chemotaxonomic significance

A phytochemical investigation of Alchornea rugosa resulted in the isolation of one stilbene glycoside (1), four megastigmane-type sesquiterpenes (2–5), nine flavonoids (6–14) and four phenols (15–18). These compounds were elucidated using spectroscopic methods and comparing their data to those reported in the literature. Among them, compounds 1, 2, and 12–15 were first isolated from Euphorbiaceae family. Compounds 3–6, 8, 11, and 18 were initially obtained from the genus Alchornea, while compounds 7, 9, 10, 16, and 17 have not been previously isolated from this species. In addition, the chemotaxonomic significance of the isolated compounds was discussed.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Biochemical Systematics and Ecology 生物-进化生物学

CiteScore

3.00

自引率

12.50%

发文量

147

审稿时长

43 days

期刊介绍： Biochemical Systematics and Ecology is devoted to the publication of original papers and reviews, both submitted and invited, in two subject areas: I) the application of biochemistry to problems relating to systematic biology of organisms (biochemical systematics); II) the role of biochemistry in interactions between organisms or between an organism and its environment (biochemical ecology). In the Biochemical Systematics subject area, comparative studies of the distribution of (secondary) metabolites within a wider taxon (e.g. genus or family) are welcome. Comparative studies, encompassing multiple accessions of each of the taxa within their distribution are particularly encouraged. Welcome are also studies combining classical chemosystematic studies (such as comparative HPLC-MS or GC-MS investigations) with (macro-) molecular phylogenetic studies. Studies that involve the comparative use of compounds to help differentiate among species such as adulterants or substitutes that illustrate the applied use of chemosystematics are welcome. In contrast, studies solely employing macromolecular phylogenetic techniques (gene sequences, RAPD studies etc.) will be considered out of scope. Discouraged are manuscripts that report known or new compounds from a single source taxon without addressing a systematic hypothesis. Also considered out of scope are studies using outdated and hard to reproduce macromolecular techniques such as RAPDs in combination with standard chemosystematic techniques such as GC-FID and GC-MS.