Ben Van Calster, Maarten van Smeden, Wouter van Amsterdam, Maarten Coemans, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg
{"title":"可靠和有用的临床预测模型的敌人:对统计和科学挑战的回顾","authors":"Ben Van Calster, Maarten van Smeden, Wouter van Amsterdam, Maarten Coemans, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg","doi":"10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.","PeriodicalId":48855,"journal":{"name":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":8.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges\",\"authors\":\"Ben Van Calster, Maarten van Smeden, Wouter van Amsterdam, Maarten Coemans, Laure Wynants, Ewout W. Steyerberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48855,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":8.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"100\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"数学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application","FirstCategoryId":"100","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-statistics-042324-123749","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"数学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MATHEMATICS, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The Enemies of Reliable and Useful Clinical Prediction Models: A Review of Statistical and Scientific Challenges
The current status of applied clinical prediction modeling is poor. Many models are developed with suboptimal methods and are not evaluated, and hence have little impact on clinical care. We review 12 challenges—provocatively labeled enemies—that jeopardize the creation of prediction models that make it to clinical practice to improve treatment decisions and clinical outcomes for individual patients. The challenges cover four areas: context, data, design and analysis, and scientific culture. We provide negative examples and recommendations for improvement, but also highlight positive examples and developments. Greater awareness of the complexities surrounding clinical prediction modeling is needed among researchers, funding agencies, health professionals as end users, and all of us as potential patients. To improve the utility of prediction models for healthcare and society, we need fewer but better models as well as more resources for model validation, impact assessment, and implementation.
期刊介绍:
The Annual Review of Statistics and Its Application publishes comprehensive review articles focusing on methodological advancements in statistics and the utilization of computational tools facilitating these advancements. It is abstracted and indexed in Scopus, Science Citation Index Expanded, and Inspec.