Anna Trullenque‐Eriksson, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, Cristiano Tomasi, Tord Berglundh, Jan Derks
{"title":"糖尿病与种植体周围炎之间的关系:来自瑞典一项基于登记的研究的证据","authors":"Anna Trullenque‐Eriksson, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, Cristiano Tomasi, Tord Berglundh, Jan Derks","doi":"10.1111/jcpe.70023","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"AimTo evaluate the association between diabetes (types 1 and 2) and peri‐implantitis through a register‐based cohort study.MethodsFour groups of individuals with dental implants were identified using multiple Swedish nationwide registers—two groups with diabetes (type 1, T1D; type 2, T2D) and two groups without diabetes (non‐T1D, non‐T2D). Longitudinal data from 2010 to 2020 were analysed. Peri‐implantitis was defined as any registered treatment of peri‐implantitis. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 18,975) was evaluated using covariate‐adjusted logistic regression analyses. Incidence (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2030) was compared using survival analyses across groups matched by age, gender, education, income and the number of implants, through propensity scores.ResultsPeri‐implantitis was more frequent among those with T1D compared to non‐T1D (21.1% vs. 15.2%; OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05–2.04), whereas the prevalence was similar in T2D and non‐T2D (20.5% vs. 18.2%; OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.16). The hazard ratios for incident peri‐implantitis were 1.52 (95% CI: 0.96–2.42) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.02–1.82) for T1D and T2D, respectively.ConclusionsT1D and T2D were associated with a higher risk for peri‐implantitis. While the elevated risk for peri‐implantitis in T1D was particularly apparent in prevalence estimates, the association for T2D was evident mainly in terms of incidence.","PeriodicalId":15380,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","volume":"27 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":6.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Association Between Diabetes and Peri‐Implantitis: Evidence From a Swedish Register‐Based Study\",\"authors\":\"Anna Trullenque‐Eriksson, Fernando Valentim Bitencourt, Cristiano Tomasi, Tord Berglundh, Jan Derks\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jcpe.70023\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"AimTo evaluate the association between diabetes (types 1 and 2) and peri‐implantitis through a register‐based cohort study.MethodsFour groups of individuals with dental implants were identified using multiple Swedish nationwide registers—two groups with diabetes (type 1, T1D; type 2, T2D) and two groups without diabetes (non‐T1D, non‐T2D). Longitudinal data from 2010 to 2020 were analysed. Peri‐implantitis was defined as any registered treatment of peri‐implantitis. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 18,975) was evaluated using covariate‐adjusted logistic regression analyses. Incidence (<jats:italic>n</jats:italic> = 2030) was compared using survival analyses across groups matched by age, gender, education, income and the number of implants, through propensity scores.ResultsPeri‐implantitis was more frequent among those with T1D compared to non‐T1D (21.1% vs. 15.2%; OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05–2.04), whereas the prevalence was similar in T2D and non‐T2D (20.5% vs. 18.2%; OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.16). The hazard ratios for incident peri‐implantitis were 1.52 (95% CI: 0.96–2.42) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.02–1.82) for T1D and T2D, respectively.ConclusionsT1D and T2D were associated with a higher risk for peri‐implantitis. While the elevated risk for peri‐implantitis in T1D was particularly apparent in prevalence estimates, the association for T2D was evident mainly in terms of incidence.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15380,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"volume\":\"27 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Clinical Periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70023\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Clinical Periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jcpe.70023","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
Association Between Diabetes and Peri‐Implantitis: Evidence From a Swedish Register‐Based Study
AimTo evaluate the association between diabetes (types 1 and 2) and peri‐implantitis through a register‐based cohort study.MethodsFour groups of individuals with dental implants were identified using multiple Swedish nationwide registers—two groups with diabetes (type 1, T1D; type 2, T2D) and two groups without diabetes (non‐T1D, non‐T2D). Longitudinal data from 2010 to 2020 were analysed. Peri‐implantitis was defined as any registered treatment of peri‐implantitis. Prevalence of peri‐implantitis (n = 18,975) was evaluated using covariate‐adjusted logistic regression analyses. Incidence (n = 2030) was compared using survival analyses across groups matched by age, gender, education, income and the number of implants, through propensity scores.ResultsPeri‐implantitis was more frequent among those with T1D compared to non‐T1D (21.1% vs. 15.2%; OR 1.46, 95% CI: 1.05–2.04), whereas the prevalence was similar in T2D and non‐T2D (20.5% vs. 18.2%; OR 1.06, 95% CI: 0.98–1.16). The hazard ratios for incident peri‐implantitis were 1.52 (95% CI: 0.96–2.42) and 1.36 (95% CI: 1.02–1.82) for T1D and T2D, respectively.ConclusionsT1D and T2D were associated with a higher risk for peri‐implantitis. While the elevated risk for peri‐implantitis in T1D was particularly apparent in prevalence estimates, the association for T2D was evident mainly in terms of incidence.
期刊介绍:
Journal of Clinical Periodontology was founded by the British, Dutch, French, German, Scandinavian, and Swiss Societies of Periodontology.
The aim of the Journal of Clinical Periodontology is to provide the platform for exchange of scientific and clinical progress in the field of Periodontology and allied disciplines, and to do so at the highest possible level. The Journal also aims to facilitate the application of new scientific knowledge to the daily practice of the concerned disciplines and addresses both practicing clinicians and academics. The Journal is the official publication of the European Federation of Periodontology but wishes to retain its international scope.
The Journal publishes original contributions of high scientific merit in the fields of periodontology and implant dentistry. Its scope encompasses the physiology and pathology of the periodontium, the tissue integration of dental implants, the biology and the modulation of periodontal and alveolar bone healing and regeneration, diagnosis, epidemiology, prevention and therapy of periodontal disease, the clinical aspects of tooth replacement with dental implants, and the comprehensive rehabilitation of the periodontal patient. Review articles by experts on new developments in basic and applied periodontal science and associated dental disciplines, advances in periodontal or implant techniques and procedures, and case reports which illustrate important new information are also welcome.