法医人类学专业标准的发展

IF 2 2区 生物学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
Eric J. Bartelink, Nicholas V. Passalacqua, Wendy E. P. McQuade
{"title":"法医人类学专业标准的发展","authors":"Eric J. Bartelink,&nbsp;Nicholas V. Passalacqua,&nbsp;Wendy E. P. McQuade","doi":"10.1002/ajpa.70117","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n <p>Over the past 50 years, forensic anthropology has grown and matured into a specialized discipline within anthropology. Because of the potential legal ramifications of conducting casework, it is imperative that forensic anthropology practitioners are aware of their role within the medicolegal system, have received the proper education, mentorship, training, and certification within the discipline, and adhere to published national forensic anthropology standards and best practices. In this paper, we outline the development of professional standards in forensic anthropology in the United States. We review the key milestones in the professionalization of forensic anthropology as a discipline, including its development within the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) and the implementation of board certification of practitioners by the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. We next discuss the key organizations involved in the drafting of forensic anthropology standards, including the pioneering efforts of the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology and the current work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology-administered Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC). We then discuss the critical role of the AAFS's Academy Standards Board, the standards development organization chosen by the OSAC Forensic Anthropology Subcommittee, which is responsible for further developing and publishing consensus-based national standards and best practices. The development of national standards for forensic anthropology has contributed to the professionalization of the discipline so that practitioners are <i>ideally</i> meeting minimum requirements to improve the reliability, consistency, and transparency of forensic anthropology casework.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":29759,"journal":{"name":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","volume":"188 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Development of Professional Standards in Forensic Anthropology\",\"authors\":\"Eric J. Bartelink,&nbsp;Nicholas V. Passalacqua,&nbsp;Wendy E. P. McQuade\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ajpa.70117\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n <p>Over the past 50 years, forensic anthropology has grown and matured into a specialized discipline within anthropology. Because of the potential legal ramifications of conducting casework, it is imperative that forensic anthropology practitioners are aware of their role within the medicolegal system, have received the proper education, mentorship, training, and certification within the discipline, and adhere to published national forensic anthropology standards and best practices. In this paper, we outline the development of professional standards in forensic anthropology in the United States. We review the key milestones in the professionalization of forensic anthropology as a discipline, including its development within the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) and the implementation of board certification of practitioners by the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. We next discuss the key organizations involved in the drafting of forensic anthropology standards, including the pioneering efforts of the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology and the current work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology-administered Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC). We then discuss the critical role of the AAFS's Academy Standards Board, the standards development organization chosen by the OSAC Forensic Anthropology Subcommittee, which is responsible for further developing and publishing consensus-based national standards and best practices. The development of national standards for forensic anthropology has contributed to the professionalization of the discipline so that practitioners are <i>ideally</i> meeting minimum requirements to improve the reliability, consistency, and transparency of forensic anthropology casework.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":29759,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"volume\":\"188 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"American Journal of Biological Anthropology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70117\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"American Journal of Biological Anthropology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ajpa.70117","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在过去的50年里,法医人类学已经成长为人类学中的一门专业学科。由于开展个案工作的潜在法律后果,法医人类学从业者必须意识到他们在医学法律体系中的角色,接受适当的教育、指导、培训和学科内的认证,并遵守已公布的国家法医人类学标准和最佳实践。在本文中,我们概述了美国法医人类学专业标准的发展。我们回顾了法医人类学作为一门学科的专业化的关键里程碑,包括它在美国法医科学院(AAFS)的发展和美国法医人类学委员会对从业者的董事会认证的实施。接下来,我们将讨论参与起草法医人类学标准的关键组织,包括法医人类学科学工作组的开创性努力,以及美国国家标准与技术研究所管理的法医科学领域委员会组织(OSAC)的当前工作。然后,我们讨论了AAFS学院标准委员会的关键作用,该委员会是由OSAC法医人类学小组委员会选择的标准制定组织,负责进一步制定和发布基于共识的国家标准和最佳实践。法医人类学国家标准的制定促进了该学科的专业化,因此从业人员可以理想地满足最低要求,以提高法医人类学案例工作的可靠性、一致性和透明度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Development of Professional Standards in Forensic Anthropology

Over the past 50 years, forensic anthropology has grown and matured into a specialized discipline within anthropology. Because of the potential legal ramifications of conducting casework, it is imperative that forensic anthropology practitioners are aware of their role within the medicolegal system, have received the proper education, mentorship, training, and certification within the discipline, and adhere to published national forensic anthropology standards and best practices. In this paper, we outline the development of professional standards in forensic anthropology in the United States. We review the key milestones in the professionalization of forensic anthropology as a discipline, including its development within the American Academy of Forensic Sciences (AAFS) and the implementation of board certification of practitioners by the American Board of Forensic Anthropology. We next discuss the key organizations involved in the drafting of forensic anthropology standards, including the pioneering efforts of the Scientific Working Group for Forensic Anthropology and the current work of the National Institute of Standards and Technology-administered Organization of Scientific Area Committees for Forensic Science (OSAC). We then discuss the critical role of the AAFS's Academy Standards Board, the standards development organization chosen by the OSAC Forensic Anthropology Subcommittee, which is responsible for further developing and publishing consensus-based national standards and best practices. The development of national standards for forensic anthropology has contributed to the professionalization of the discipline so that practitioners are ideally meeting minimum requirements to improve the reliability, consistency, and transparency of forensic anthropology casework.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信