{"title":"评估加拿大区域气候模式风速的性能","authors":"Michael Morris, Emilia Diaconescu","doi":"10.1002/joc.8912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8912","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada\",\"authors\":\"Michael Morris, Emilia Diaconescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":\"45 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8912\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada
Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.
期刊介绍:
The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions