评估加拿大区域气候模式风速的性能

IF 2.8 3区 地球科学 Q2 METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES
Michael Morris, Emilia Diaconescu
{"title":"评估加拿大区域气候模式风速的性能","authors":"Michael Morris,&nbsp;Emilia Diaconescu","doi":"10.1002/joc.8912","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.</p>","PeriodicalId":13779,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Climatology","volume":"45 10","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8912","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada\",\"authors\":\"Michael Morris,&nbsp;Emilia Diaconescu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/joc.8912\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"volume\":\"45 10\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/joc.8912\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Climatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8912\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Climatology","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://rmets.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/joc.8912","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"METEOROLOGY & ATMOSPHERIC SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人为引起的气候变化正在重塑加拿大各地的风力模式,给风能和基础设施规划等部门带来了重大挑战。本研究通过分析不同区域气候模式(RCM)的输出,评估了区域气候模式(RCM)模拟加拿大近地面风速(WS)的能力,这些RCM集合降低了CMIP5全球气候模式(GCM)的输出,包括NA-CORDEX多模式集合(0.22°分辨率)和CanRCM4单模式大集合(0.44°分辨率)。将这些RCM输出与观测数据、两个再分析数据集(ERA5和AgERA5)以及CMIP5和CMIP6的GCM集合进行比较。评估考察了模型复制历史WS分布、平均和极端WS偏差、趋势和时间变异性的能力。研究结果表明,尽管rcm具有较高的空间分辨率,但它们相对于GCM组合的附加价值有限,这引起了人们对rcm衍生的WS预估在没有进一步偏差调整或统计降尺度的情况下用于气候服务的可靠性的担忧。rcm和gcm都无法准确模拟WS趋势,这降低了对未来WS预测的信心,可能导致风险评估不足,对气候变化对能源和基础设施等重要部门的影响准备不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada

Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada

Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada

Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada

Assessing the Performance of Regional Climate Model Wind Speeds Over Canada

Human-induced climate change is reshaping wind patterns across Canada, posing significant challenges for sectors such as wind energy and infrastructure planning. This study assesses the capability of regional climate models (RCMs) in simulating near-surface wind speed (WS) across Canada by analysing outputs from various RCM ensembles, which downscale CMIP5 global climate model (GCM) output, including the NA-CORDEX multi-model ensemble (at 0.22° resolution) and the CanRCM4 single-model large ensemble (at 0.44° resolution). These RCM outputs are compared against observational data, two reanalysis data sets (ERA5 and AgERA5), and GCM ensembles from CMIP5 and CMIP6. The evaluation examines the models' ability to replicate historical WS distributions, biases in mean and extreme WS, trends and temporal variability. The findings reveal that, despite the higher spatial resolution of RCMs, their added value over the GCM ensembles is limited, raising concerns about the reliability of RCM-derived WS projections for climate services without further bias adjustment or statistical downscaling. The inability of both RCMs and GCMs to accurately simulate WS trends diminishes confidence in future WS projections, potentially leading to inadequate risk assessments and insufficient preparation for the impacts of climate change on vital sectors like energy and infrastructure.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
International Journal of Climatology
International Journal of Climatology 地学-气象与大气科学
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
7.70%
发文量
417
审稿时长
4 months
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Climatology aims to span the well established but rapidly growing field of climatology, through the publication of research papers, short communications, major reviews of progress and reviews of new books and reports in the area of climate science. The Journal’s main role is to stimulate and report research in climatology, from the expansive fields of the atmospheric, biophysical, engineering and social sciences. Coverage includes: Climate system science; Local to global scale climate observations and modelling; Seasonal to interannual climate prediction; Climatic variability and climate change; Synoptic, dynamic and urban climatology, hydroclimatology, human bioclimatology, ecoclimatology, dendroclimatology, palaeoclimatology, marine climatology and atmosphere-ocean interactions; Application of climatological knowledge to environmental assessment and management and economic production; Climate and society interactions
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信