中国老年乳腺癌患者的选择与年轻女性有何不同?

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 SURGERY
To-ki Dacita Suen MBChB, MS in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery (UEA), MScHSM (CUHK), MRCSEd, FRACS, FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK, 孫杜琪, Ava Kwong MBBS(Lon), BSc(St Andrews), PhD, FRCS (Edin), FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK, 鄺靄慧
{"title":"中国老年乳腺癌患者的选择与年轻女性有何不同?","authors":"To-ki Dacita Suen MBChB, MS in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery (UEA), MScHSM (CUHK), MRCSEd, FRACS, FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK,&nbsp;孫杜琪,&nbsp;Ava Kwong MBBS(Lon), BSc(St Andrews), PhD, FRCS (Edin), FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK,&nbsp;鄺靄慧","doi":"10.1111/1744-1633.70003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Introduction</h3>\n \n <p>This study aims to investigate how the preferences of older women are different from their young counterparts.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Methods</h3>\n \n <p>Female patients with operable breast cancer diagnosed between September 2009 and August 2015 were recruited. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire to score the importance of a list of items while deciding the surgical option (0 = entirely not important and 5 = extremely important).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>During the study period, 911 female patients with primary operable breast cancer received surgery in our unit. Of these, 837 patients had completed the questionnaire (participation rate 91.9%), among which 112 patients (13.4%) were aged 70 years and above. Concerns about a complete cure from cancer (mean score 4.64, standard deviation 0.62) and recurrence (mean score 4.65, standard deviation 0.66) were the two top-ranked items considered important by patients. Patients in the older age group assigned less importance to physical considerations (<i>P</i> &lt; .001), complete cure from cancer (<i>P</i> = .042), and role of spouse and friends (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) as compared with their young counterparts. By contrast, older patients considered side effects (<i>P</i> = .013) and accessibility of radiation (<i>P</i> = .002) as more important.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Identifying the factors influencing breast cancer treatment decisions helps healthcare professionals provide adequate information and support to older women in their decision-making process.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":51190,"journal":{"name":"Surgical Practice","volume":"29 3","pages":"146-153"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-1633.70003","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How do the preferences of older Chinese women with operable breast cancer differ from their younger counterparts?\",\"authors\":\"To-ki Dacita Suen MBChB, MS in Oncoplastic Breast Surgery (UEA), MScHSM (CUHK), MRCSEd, FRACS, FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK,&nbsp;孫杜琪,&nbsp;Ava Kwong MBBS(Lon), BSc(St Andrews), PhD, FRCS (Edin), FHKAM (Surgery), FCSHK,&nbsp;鄺靄慧\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/1744-1633.70003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Introduction</h3>\\n \\n <p>This study aims to investigate how the preferences of older women are different from their young counterparts.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>Female patients with operable breast cancer diagnosed between September 2009 and August 2015 were recruited. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire to score the importance of a list of items while deciding the surgical option (0 = entirely not important and 5 = extremely important).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>During the study period, 911 female patients with primary operable breast cancer received surgery in our unit. Of these, 837 patients had completed the questionnaire (participation rate 91.9%), among which 112 patients (13.4%) were aged 70 years and above. Concerns about a complete cure from cancer (mean score 4.64, standard deviation 0.62) and recurrence (mean score 4.65, standard deviation 0.66) were the two top-ranked items considered important by patients. Patients in the older age group assigned less importance to physical considerations (<i>P</i> &lt; .001), complete cure from cancer (<i>P</i> = .042), and role of spouse and friends (<i>P</i> &lt; .001) as compared with their young counterparts. By contrast, older patients considered side effects (<i>P</i> = .013) and accessibility of radiation (<i>P</i> = .002) as more important.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Identifying the factors influencing breast cancer treatment decisions helps healthcare professionals provide adequate information and support to older women in their decision-making process.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":51190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"volume\":\"29 3\",\"pages\":\"146-153\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/1744-1633.70003\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Surgical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.70003\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"SURGERY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Surgical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1744-1633.70003","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"SURGERY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在调查老年女性与年轻女性的偏好有何不同。方法选取2009年9月至2015年8月诊断为可手术乳腺癌的女性患者。参与者被邀请完成一份问卷,在决定手术方案时对一系列项目的重要性进行评分(0 =完全不重要,5 =极其重要)。结果研究期间,我单位共有911例原发性可手术乳腺癌女性患者接受手术治疗。其中837例患者完成了问卷调查,参与率为91.9%,其中年龄在70岁及以上的患者112例,占13.4%。癌症完全治愈(平均评分4.64,标准差0.62)和复发(平均评分4.65,标准差0.66)是患者认为最重要的两个问题。老年患者对身体因素的重视程度较低(P <)001),完全治愈癌症(P =。042),以及配偶和朋友的角色(P < .001)。相比之下,老年患者认为副作用(P = 0.013)和放疗的可及性(P = 0.002)更为重要。结论明确影响乳腺癌治疗决策的因素有助于医护人员在老年妇女的治疗决策过程中提供充分的信息和支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

How do the preferences of older Chinese women with operable breast cancer differ from their younger counterparts?

How do the preferences of older Chinese women with operable breast cancer differ from their younger counterparts?

Introduction

This study aims to investigate how the preferences of older women are different from their young counterparts.

Methods

Female patients with operable breast cancer diagnosed between September 2009 and August 2015 were recruited. Participants were invited to complete a questionnaire to score the importance of a list of items while deciding the surgical option (0 = entirely not important and 5 = extremely important).

Results

During the study period, 911 female patients with primary operable breast cancer received surgery in our unit. Of these, 837 patients had completed the questionnaire (participation rate 91.9%), among which 112 patients (13.4%) were aged 70 years and above. Concerns about a complete cure from cancer (mean score 4.64, standard deviation 0.62) and recurrence (mean score 4.65, standard deviation 0.66) were the two top-ranked items considered important by patients. Patients in the older age group assigned less importance to physical considerations (P < .001), complete cure from cancer (P = .042), and role of spouse and friends (P < .001) as compared with their young counterparts. By contrast, older patients considered side effects (P = .013) and accessibility of radiation (P = .002) as more important.

Conclusion

Identifying the factors influencing breast cancer treatment decisions helps healthcare professionals provide adequate information and support to older women in their decision-making process.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Surgical Practice
Surgical Practice 医学-外科
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
74
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Surgical Practice is a peer-reviewed quarterly journal, which is dedicated to the art and science of advances in clinical practice and research in surgery. Surgical Practice publishes papers in all fields of surgery and surgery-related disciplines. It consists of sections of history, leading articles, reviews, original papers, discussion papers, education, case reports, short notes on surgical techniques and letters to the Editor.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信