结构可靠度分析的概率密度演化方法:平行贝叶斯主动学习视角

IF 4.8 2区 工程技术 Q1 COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS
Tong Zhou , Tong Guo , Jize Zhang
{"title":"结构可靠度分析的概率密度演化方法:平行贝叶斯主动学习视角","authors":"Tong Zhou ,&nbsp;Tong Guo ,&nbsp;Jize Zhang","doi":"10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107936","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>While probability density evolution method (PDEM) paired with active learning shows strong promise for structural reliability analysis, its broader adoption is hindered by unresolved theoretical limitations and computational inefficiencies. In this work, we present the first attempt at casting a Bayesian inference perspective for evaluating failure probability in PDEM. First, it quantifies epistemic uncertainty through a posterior mean and a provable upper bound of variance (UBV) of failure probability, overcoming limitations of the traditional frequentist approaches. Then, three critical ingredients of parallel active learning paradigm are designed: (i) A multi-point learning function called the upper bound of variance reduction (UBVR) is analytically deduced to quantify the impact of adding <span><math><mi>k</mi><mo>(</mo><mo>≥</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span> new samples. (ii) Batch enrichment process is achieved via a principled stepwise maximization strategy of UBVR, eliminating the need for those goal-inconsistent batch selection strategies. (iii) A hybrid convergence criterion is defined by continuously monitoring the instantaneous value of UBV. The proposed method offers a comprehensive framework for fusing Bayesian inference of failure probability and parallel active learning in PDEM. It is tested on five examples and compared against several existing parallel active learning reliability methods. Results indicate that the proposed approach matches similar accuracy to state-of-the-art methods with great computational cost savings.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50626,"journal":{"name":"Computers & Structures","volume":"317 ","pages":"Article 107936"},"PeriodicalIF":4.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Probability density evolution method for structural reliability analysis: A parallel Bayesian active learning perspective\",\"authors\":\"Tong Zhou ,&nbsp;Tong Guo ,&nbsp;Jize Zhang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.compstruc.2025.107936\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>While probability density evolution method (PDEM) paired with active learning shows strong promise for structural reliability analysis, its broader adoption is hindered by unresolved theoretical limitations and computational inefficiencies. In this work, we present the first attempt at casting a Bayesian inference perspective for evaluating failure probability in PDEM. First, it quantifies epistemic uncertainty through a posterior mean and a provable upper bound of variance (UBV) of failure probability, overcoming limitations of the traditional frequentist approaches. Then, three critical ingredients of parallel active learning paradigm are designed: (i) A multi-point learning function called the upper bound of variance reduction (UBVR) is analytically deduced to quantify the impact of adding <span><math><mi>k</mi><mo>(</mo><mo>≥</mo><mn>1</mn><mo>)</mo></math></span> new samples. (ii) Batch enrichment process is achieved via a principled stepwise maximization strategy of UBVR, eliminating the need for those goal-inconsistent batch selection strategies. (iii) A hybrid convergence criterion is defined by continuously monitoring the instantaneous value of UBV. The proposed method offers a comprehensive framework for fusing Bayesian inference of failure probability and parallel active learning in PDEM. It is tested on five examples and compared against several existing parallel active learning reliability methods. Results indicate that the proposed approach matches similar accuracy to state-of-the-art methods with great computational cost savings.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Computers & Structures\",\"volume\":\"317 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107936\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Computers & Structures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045794925002949\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Computers & Structures","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0045794925002949","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, INTERDISCIPLINARY APPLICATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

虽然概率密度进化方法(PDEM)与主动学习相结合,在结构可靠性分析中显示出强大的前景,但其广泛应用受到未解决的理论限制和计算效率低下的阻碍。在这项工作中,我们首次尝试用贝叶斯推理的角度来评估PDEM的失效概率。首先,该方法通过故障概率的后验均值和可证明方差上界(UBV)来量化认知不确定性,克服了传统频率论方法的局限性;然后,设计了并行主动学习范式的三个关键要素:(1)分析推导了一个称为方差缩减上界(UBVR)的多点学习函数,以量化增加k(≥1)个新样本的影响。(ii)批量富集过程通过UBVR的原则性逐步最大化策略实现,消除了那些目标不一致的批量选择策略的需要。(iii)通过连续监测UBV的瞬时值,定义混合收敛准则。该方法为PDEM中贝叶斯失效概率推理与并行主动学习的融合提供了一个全面的框架。通过5个实例进行了测试,并与现有的几种并行主动学习可靠性方法进行了比较。结果表明,该方法与最先进的方法具有相似的精度,并且节省了大量的计算成本。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Probability density evolution method for structural reliability analysis: A parallel Bayesian active learning perspective
While probability density evolution method (PDEM) paired with active learning shows strong promise for structural reliability analysis, its broader adoption is hindered by unresolved theoretical limitations and computational inefficiencies. In this work, we present the first attempt at casting a Bayesian inference perspective for evaluating failure probability in PDEM. First, it quantifies epistemic uncertainty through a posterior mean and a provable upper bound of variance (UBV) of failure probability, overcoming limitations of the traditional frequentist approaches. Then, three critical ingredients of parallel active learning paradigm are designed: (i) A multi-point learning function called the upper bound of variance reduction (UBVR) is analytically deduced to quantify the impact of adding k(1) new samples. (ii) Batch enrichment process is achieved via a principled stepwise maximization strategy of UBVR, eliminating the need for those goal-inconsistent batch selection strategies. (iii) A hybrid convergence criterion is defined by continuously monitoring the instantaneous value of UBV. The proposed method offers a comprehensive framework for fusing Bayesian inference of failure probability and parallel active learning in PDEM. It is tested on five examples and compared against several existing parallel active learning reliability methods. Results indicate that the proposed approach matches similar accuracy to state-of-the-art methods with great computational cost savings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Computers & Structures
Computers & Structures 工程技术-工程:土木
CiteScore
8.80
自引率
6.40%
发文量
122
审稿时长
33 days
期刊介绍: Computers & Structures publishes advances in the development and use of computational methods for the solution of problems in engineering and the sciences. The range of appropriate contributions is wide, and includes papers on establishing appropriate mathematical models and their numerical solution in all areas of mechanics. The journal also includes articles that present a substantial review of a field in the topics of the journal.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信