基于遥感与机制模型的农业景观防护林孔隙度与防风效果空间评价

IF 5.7 1区 农林科学 Q1 AGRONOMY
Xing Zhang , Bolin Fu , Rongxin Deng , Ying Li , Jingwen Li , Jianwu Jiang , Jing Tang
{"title":"基于遥感与机制模型的农业景观防护林孔隙度与防风效果空间评价","authors":"Xing Zhang ,&nbsp;Bolin Fu ,&nbsp;Rongxin Deng ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Jingwen Li ,&nbsp;Jianwu Jiang ,&nbsp;Jing Tang","doi":"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110822","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Shelterbelts serve critical functions in protecting agricultural ecosystems through soil erosion mitigation, wind damage reduction, and enhancement of farming system resilience. However, traditional evaluations of windbreak effectiveness have predominantly focused on localized zones close to shelterbelts, overlooking spatial heterogeneity and impeding landscape-level assessments. To fill this gap, this study first explored the relationship between shelterbelt structural parameters and remote sensing pixel, and further improved the method for extracting shelterbelt width by pixel decomposition. Then, we examined the influence of key shelterbelt parameters on porosity, and developed a mechanistic model to quantify shelterbelt porosity. We calculated the friction coefficient of shelterbelts and constructed a windbreak speed attenuation model within spatial computation domain based on porosity. Finally, by integrating regional prevailing wind direction and farmland distribution, we proposed the Windbreak Effectiveness Index (WEI) to assess shelterbelt protection in agricultural landscapes. The principal findings are summarized as follows: (1) The dimidiate pixel model reliably estimated shelterbelt fractional coverage across different ages (R² = 0.764, RMSE = 0.151), while the improved width extraction method demonstrated strong alignment with field measurements (R² = 0.758, RMSE = 2.12 m, MAE = 1.78 m) with minimal directional bias. (2) The developed mechanistic porosity model accurately characterized structural complexity of shelterbelt (R² = 0.775, RMSE = 0.066). Remote sensing data effectively captured porosity spatial variations (R² = 0.759, RMSE = 0.071) to extract shelterbelt horizontal structural parameters. (3) The friction coefficient effectively quantified wind speed attenuation near shelterbelts (R² = 0.628, RMSE = 0.080). The proposed WEI demonstrated to be a robust index for spatially revealing windbreak performance, with optimal windbreak effectiveness reaching 53.13 % in the study area. This research proposes a novel spatial framework for evaluating windbreak effectiveness of shelterbelt, offering actionable methods for optimizing shelterbelt design and management across agricultural landscapes.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50839,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","volume":"374 ","pages":"Article 110822"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrating remote sensing and mechanistic model for spatial evaluation of shelterbelt porosity and windbreak effectiveness in agricultural landscapes\",\"authors\":\"Xing Zhang ,&nbsp;Bolin Fu ,&nbsp;Rongxin Deng ,&nbsp;Ying Li ,&nbsp;Jingwen Li ,&nbsp;Jianwu Jiang ,&nbsp;Jing Tang\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agrformet.2025.110822\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Shelterbelts serve critical functions in protecting agricultural ecosystems through soil erosion mitigation, wind damage reduction, and enhancement of farming system resilience. However, traditional evaluations of windbreak effectiveness have predominantly focused on localized zones close to shelterbelts, overlooking spatial heterogeneity and impeding landscape-level assessments. To fill this gap, this study first explored the relationship between shelterbelt structural parameters and remote sensing pixel, and further improved the method for extracting shelterbelt width by pixel decomposition. Then, we examined the influence of key shelterbelt parameters on porosity, and developed a mechanistic model to quantify shelterbelt porosity. We calculated the friction coefficient of shelterbelts and constructed a windbreak speed attenuation model within spatial computation domain based on porosity. Finally, by integrating regional prevailing wind direction and farmland distribution, we proposed the Windbreak Effectiveness Index (WEI) to assess shelterbelt protection in agricultural landscapes. The principal findings are summarized as follows: (1) The dimidiate pixel model reliably estimated shelterbelt fractional coverage across different ages (R² = 0.764, RMSE = 0.151), while the improved width extraction method demonstrated strong alignment with field measurements (R² = 0.758, RMSE = 2.12 m, MAE = 1.78 m) with minimal directional bias. (2) The developed mechanistic porosity model accurately characterized structural complexity of shelterbelt (R² = 0.775, RMSE = 0.066). Remote sensing data effectively captured porosity spatial variations (R² = 0.759, RMSE = 0.071) to extract shelterbelt horizontal structural parameters. (3) The friction coefficient effectively quantified wind speed attenuation near shelterbelts (R² = 0.628, RMSE = 0.080). The proposed WEI demonstrated to be a robust index for spatially revealing windbreak performance, with optimal windbreak effectiveness reaching 53.13 % in the study area. This research proposes a novel spatial framework for evaluating windbreak effectiveness of shelterbelt, offering actionable methods for optimizing shelterbelt design and management across agricultural landscapes.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"volume\":\"374 \",\"pages\":\"Article 110822\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004411\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRONOMY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural and Forest Meteorology","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0168192325004411","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRONOMY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

防护林通过减缓土壤侵蚀、减少风害和增强农业系统恢复力,在保护农业生态系统方面发挥着关键作用。然而,传统的防风林有效性评估主要集中在靠近防护林的局部区域,忽视了空间异质性,阻碍了景观水平的评估。为了填补这一空白,本研究首先探索了林带结构参数与遥感像元之间的关系,并进一步改进了利用像元分解提取林带宽度的方法。在此基础上,研究了林带关键参数对孔隙度的影响,建立了林带孔隙度量化的机理模型。计算了防护林的摩擦系数,建立了基于孔隙度的空间计算域内防风林速度衰减模型。最后,结合区域主导风向和农田分布,提出了用于评价农业景观防护林保护效果的防风效能指数(WEI)。主要研究结果如下:(1)中间像元模型对不同年龄的林带覆盖度估算结果可靠(R²= 0.764,RMSE = 0.151),改进的林带宽度提取方法与野外测量结果吻合较好(R²= 0.758,RMSE = 2.12 m, MAE = 1.78 m),且方向偏差最小。(2)建立的机制孔隙度模型较准确地表征了林带的结构复杂性(R²= 0.775,RMSE = 0.066)。遥感数据有效捕获孔隙度空间变化(R²= 0.759,RMSE = 0.071),提取林带水平结构参数。(3)摩擦系数能有效量化防护林附近风速衰减(R²= 0.628,RMSE = 0.080)。结果表明,该方法具有较强的防风林有效性,研究区最优防风林有效性可达53.13%。本研究提出了一种新的评估防护林防风效果的空间框架,为优化农业景观防护林的设计和管理提供了可行的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrating remote sensing and mechanistic model for spatial evaluation of shelterbelt porosity and windbreak effectiveness in agricultural landscapes
Shelterbelts serve critical functions in protecting agricultural ecosystems through soil erosion mitigation, wind damage reduction, and enhancement of farming system resilience. However, traditional evaluations of windbreak effectiveness have predominantly focused on localized zones close to shelterbelts, overlooking spatial heterogeneity and impeding landscape-level assessments. To fill this gap, this study first explored the relationship between shelterbelt structural parameters and remote sensing pixel, and further improved the method for extracting shelterbelt width by pixel decomposition. Then, we examined the influence of key shelterbelt parameters on porosity, and developed a mechanistic model to quantify shelterbelt porosity. We calculated the friction coefficient of shelterbelts and constructed a windbreak speed attenuation model within spatial computation domain based on porosity. Finally, by integrating regional prevailing wind direction and farmland distribution, we proposed the Windbreak Effectiveness Index (WEI) to assess shelterbelt protection in agricultural landscapes. The principal findings are summarized as follows: (1) The dimidiate pixel model reliably estimated shelterbelt fractional coverage across different ages (R² = 0.764, RMSE = 0.151), while the improved width extraction method demonstrated strong alignment with field measurements (R² = 0.758, RMSE = 2.12 m, MAE = 1.78 m) with minimal directional bias. (2) The developed mechanistic porosity model accurately characterized structural complexity of shelterbelt (R² = 0.775, RMSE = 0.066). Remote sensing data effectively captured porosity spatial variations (R² = 0.759, RMSE = 0.071) to extract shelterbelt horizontal structural parameters. (3) The friction coefficient effectively quantified wind speed attenuation near shelterbelts (R² = 0.628, RMSE = 0.080). The proposed WEI demonstrated to be a robust index for spatially revealing windbreak performance, with optimal windbreak effectiveness reaching 53.13 % in the study area. This research proposes a novel spatial framework for evaluating windbreak effectiveness of shelterbelt, offering actionable methods for optimizing shelterbelt design and management across agricultural landscapes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
10.30
自引率
9.70%
发文量
415
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Agricultural and Forest Meteorology is an international journal for the publication of original articles and reviews on the inter-relationship between meteorology, agriculture, forestry, and natural ecosystems. Emphasis is on basic and applied scientific research relevant to practical problems in the field of plant and soil sciences, ecology and biogeochemistry as affected by weather as well as climate variability and change. Theoretical models should be tested against experimental data. Articles must appeal to an international audience. Special issues devoted to single topics are also published. Typical topics include canopy micrometeorology (e.g. canopy radiation transfer, turbulence near the ground, evapotranspiration, energy balance, fluxes of trace gases), micrometeorological instrumentation (e.g., sensors for trace gases, flux measurement instruments, radiation measurement techniques), aerobiology (e.g. the dispersion of pollen, spores, insects and pesticides), biometeorology (e.g. the effect of weather and climate on plant distribution, crop yield, water-use efficiency, and plant phenology), forest-fire/weather interactions, and feedbacks from vegetation to weather and the climate system.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信