行人自动紧急制动系统检测和减速的昼夜性能差异

IF 6.2 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS
Zeinab Bayati, Asad J. Khattak, Nastaran Moradloo
{"title":"行人自动紧急制动系统检测和减速的昼夜性能差异","authors":"Zeinab Bayati,&nbsp;Asad J. Khattak,&nbsp;Nastaran Moradloo","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108221","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>The alarming increase in pedestrian fatalities highlights the urgent need for effective protection technologies. One such technology is the Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (P-AEB) system, a driver assistance feature that provides temporary braking support to help prevent crashes. Despite their availability, the effectiveness of the P-AEB system varies significantly, necessitating continuous performance evaluations under various conditions, especially during nighttime, when 75% of fatal pedestrian crashes occur. This study evaluates the effectiveness of P-AEB systems under varying visibility conditions by analyzing 2,494 tests, comprising 1,654 nighttime tests and 840 daytime tests, conducted with 42 vehicles manufactured between 2021 and 2024. The experimental data were sourced from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. A random-effects Heckman sample selection model estimates the detection probabilities and deceleration rates, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity across vehicles and test scenarios. The results show that the detection rates were approximately 98% during the day, 87% at night under low-beam headlights, and 93% at night under high-beam headlights. Despite detection, crashes still occurred in 23% of low beam tests, compared to just 10% during the day. Additionally, crashes at night generally occurred at higher speeds. Furthermore, the model’s results show that halogen low beams can reduce detection capability by up to 43% compared to daytime, underscoring the need for improved P-AEB performance under low-light conditions. This study also incorporates pedestrian movement and vehicle characteristics, such as fuel type and size, revealing their notable association with P-AEB performance. The findings aim to improve pedestrian safety by enhancing P-AEB system effectiveness across varying lighting conditions.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"221 ","pages":"Article 108221"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Day and night performance differences in detection and deceleration by pedestrian automatic emergency braking systems\",\"authors\":\"Zeinab Bayati,&nbsp;Asad J. Khattak,&nbsp;Nastaran Moradloo\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2025.108221\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>The alarming increase in pedestrian fatalities highlights the urgent need for effective protection technologies. One such technology is the Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (P-AEB) system, a driver assistance feature that provides temporary braking support to help prevent crashes. Despite their availability, the effectiveness of the P-AEB system varies significantly, necessitating continuous performance evaluations under various conditions, especially during nighttime, when 75% of fatal pedestrian crashes occur. This study evaluates the effectiveness of P-AEB systems under varying visibility conditions by analyzing 2,494 tests, comprising 1,654 nighttime tests and 840 daytime tests, conducted with 42 vehicles manufactured between 2021 and 2024. The experimental data were sourced from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. A random-effects Heckman sample selection model estimates the detection probabilities and deceleration rates, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity across vehicles and test scenarios. The results show that the detection rates were approximately 98% during the day, 87% at night under low-beam headlights, and 93% at night under high-beam headlights. Despite detection, crashes still occurred in 23% of low beam tests, compared to just 10% during the day. Additionally, crashes at night generally occurred at higher speeds. Furthermore, the model’s results show that halogen low beams can reduce detection capability by up to 43% compared to daytime, underscoring the need for improved P-AEB performance under low-light conditions. This study also incorporates pedestrian movement and vehicle characteristics, such as fuel type and size, revealing their notable association with P-AEB performance. The findings aim to improve pedestrian safety by enhancing P-AEB system effectiveness across varying lighting conditions.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"221 \",\"pages\":\"Article 108221\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003094\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457525003094","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

行人死亡人数的惊人增长凸显了对有效保护技术的迫切需求。其中一项技术是行人自动紧急制动(P-AEB)系统,这是一种驾驶员辅助功能,可以提供临时制动支持,帮助防止碰撞。尽管P-AEB系统可用,但其有效性差异很大,需要在各种条件下进行持续的性能评估,特别是在夜间,因为75%的致命行人碰撞发生在夜间。该研究分析了2021年至2024年生产的42辆汽车进行的2494次试验(1654次夜间试验和840次日间试验),评估了P-AEB系统在不同能见度条件下的有效性。实验数据来源于公路安全保险协会。随机效应Heckman样本选择模型估计检测概率和减速率,考虑到车辆和测试场景之间未观察到的异质性。结果表明,在白天、夜间、远光灯下,车辆的检测率分别为98%、87%和93%。尽管有检测,但仍有23%的低光束测试发生碰撞,而白天只有10%。此外,夜间的撞车事故通常发生在高速行驶的情况下。此外,该模型的结果表明,与白天相比,卤素低光束可以降低高达43%的探测能力,这强调了在低光条件下改进P-AEB性能的必要性。该研究还纳入了行人运动和车辆特征,如燃料类型和大小,揭示了它们与P-AEB性能的显著关联。研究结果旨在通过提高P-AEB系统在不同照明条件下的有效性来提高行人安全。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Day and night performance differences in detection and deceleration by pedestrian automatic emergency braking systems
The alarming increase in pedestrian fatalities highlights the urgent need for effective protection technologies. One such technology is the Pedestrian Automatic Emergency Braking (P-AEB) system, a driver assistance feature that provides temporary braking support to help prevent crashes. Despite their availability, the effectiveness of the P-AEB system varies significantly, necessitating continuous performance evaluations under various conditions, especially during nighttime, when 75% of fatal pedestrian crashes occur. This study evaluates the effectiveness of P-AEB systems under varying visibility conditions by analyzing 2,494 tests, comprising 1,654 nighttime tests and 840 daytime tests, conducted with 42 vehicles manufactured between 2021 and 2024. The experimental data were sourced from the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety. A random-effects Heckman sample selection model estimates the detection probabilities and deceleration rates, accounting for unobserved heterogeneity across vehicles and test scenarios. The results show that the detection rates were approximately 98% during the day, 87% at night under low-beam headlights, and 93% at night under high-beam headlights. Despite detection, crashes still occurred in 23% of low beam tests, compared to just 10% during the day. Additionally, crashes at night generally occurred at higher speeds. Furthermore, the model’s results show that halogen low beams can reduce detection capability by up to 43% compared to daytime, underscoring the need for improved P-AEB performance under low-light conditions. This study also incorporates pedestrian movement and vehicle characteristics, such as fuel type and size, revealing their notable association with P-AEB performance. The findings aim to improve pedestrian safety by enhancing P-AEB system effectiveness across varying lighting conditions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信