深入挖掘:评估美国国内钴矿开采的权衡

IF 10.2 2区 经济学 0 ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES
Chava Makman, Brandon Marc Finn
{"title":"深入挖掘:评估美国国内钴矿开采的权衡","authors":"Chava Makman,&nbsp;Brandon Marc Finn","doi":"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105729","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>Cobalt is a critical mineral for the global shift to decarbonized energy systems. Cobalt supply chains, however, raise urgent questions about their stability and environmental impact, and are embroiled in human rights issues. Recent U.S. federal initiatives have intensified efforts to onshore critical mineral mining. The goals of onshoring include securing domestic sources and reducing China's dominance over mineral supply chains. Although large cobalt deposits are rare in the U.S., southeastern Idaho has a significant and untapped source. Accessing U.S domestic reserves of cobalt, like other critical minerals, involves complex trade-offs at the intersection of decarbonization, national security, and global supply chain dynamics. Drawing on qualitative interviews with diverse stakeholders, this study unpacks these trade-offs and challenges. These interrelated challenges include environmental degradation, access and quality of reserves, economic interests, and the disproportionate risks of mining to Indigenous communities. We integrate expert and community perspectives to highlight the profound moral complexities at the core of U.S. critical mineral onshoring efforts, exemplified through cobalt mining. We urge policymakers and scholars to grapple with the layered consequences of cobalt mining and demonstrate that sustainability questions must necessarily be considered across geographies and contexts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":20970,"journal":{"name":"Resources Policy","volume":"109 ","pages":"Article 105729"},"PeriodicalIF":10.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Digging deeper: Assessing the trade-offs of domestic cobalt mining in the United States of America\",\"authors\":\"Chava Makman,&nbsp;Brandon Marc Finn\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.resourpol.2025.105729\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>Cobalt is a critical mineral for the global shift to decarbonized energy systems. Cobalt supply chains, however, raise urgent questions about their stability and environmental impact, and are embroiled in human rights issues. Recent U.S. federal initiatives have intensified efforts to onshore critical mineral mining. The goals of onshoring include securing domestic sources and reducing China's dominance over mineral supply chains. Although large cobalt deposits are rare in the U.S., southeastern Idaho has a significant and untapped source. Accessing U.S domestic reserves of cobalt, like other critical minerals, involves complex trade-offs at the intersection of decarbonization, national security, and global supply chain dynamics. Drawing on qualitative interviews with diverse stakeholders, this study unpacks these trade-offs and challenges. These interrelated challenges include environmental degradation, access and quality of reserves, economic interests, and the disproportionate risks of mining to Indigenous communities. We integrate expert and community perspectives to highlight the profound moral complexities at the core of U.S. critical mineral onshoring efforts, exemplified through cobalt mining. We urge policymakers and scholars to grapple with the layered consequences of cobalt mining and demonstrate that sustainability questions must necessarily be considered across geographies and contexts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":20970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Resources Policy\",\"volume\":\"109 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105729\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":10.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Resources Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002715\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Resources Policy","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0301420725002715","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

钴是全球向脱碳能源系统转变的关键矿物。然而,钴供应链引发了关于其稳定性和环境影响的紧迫问题,并卷入了人权问题。最近,美国联邦政府加大了对陆上关键矿产开采的努力。在岸的目标包括确保国内资源和削弱中国在矿产供应链上的主导地位。虽然大型钴矿床在美国很少见,但爱达荷州东南部有一个重要的未开发资源。与其他重要矿产一样,开采美国国内的钴储量涉及到脱碳、国家安全和全球供应链动态的复杂权衡。通过对不同利益相关者的定性访谈,本研究揭示了这些权衡和挑战。这些相互关联的挑战包括环境退化、储量的获取和质量、经济利益以及采矿对土著社区造成的不成比例的风险。我们整合了专家和社区的观点,以突出美国关键矿产在岸工作的核心深刻的道德复杂性,以钴开采为例。我们敦促政策制定者和学者努力解决钴开采的分层后果,并证明必须跨地域和背景考虑可持续性问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Digging deeper: Assessing the trade-offs of domestic cobalt mining in the United States of America
Cobalt is a critical mineral for the global shift to decarbonized energy systems. Cobalt supply chains, however, raise urgent questions about their stability and environmental impact, and are embroiled in human rights issues. Recent U.S. federal initiatives have intensified efforts to onshore critical mineral mining. The goals of onshoring include securing domestic sources and reducing China's dominance over mineral supply chains. Although large cobalt deposits are rare in the U.S., southeastern Idaho has a significant and untapped source. Accessing U.S domestic reserves of cobalt, like other critical minerals, involves complex trade-offs at the intersection of decarbonization, national security, and global supply chain dynamics. Drawing on qualitative interviews with diverse stakeholders, this study unpacks these trade-offs and challenges. These interrelated challenges include environmental degradation, access and quality of reserves, economic interests, and the disproportionate risks of mining to Indigenous communities. We integrate expert and community perspectives to highlight the profound moral complexities at the core of U.S. critical mineral onshoring efforts, exemplified through cobalt mining. We urge policymakers and scholars to grapple with the layered consequences of cobalt mining and demonstrate that sustainability questions must necessarily be considered across geographies and contexts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Resources Policy
Resources Policy ENVIRONMENTAL STUDIES-
CiteScore
13.40
自引率
23.50%
发文量
602
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: Resources Policy is an international journal focused on the economics and policy aspects of mineral and fossil fuel extraction, production, and utilization. It targets individuals in academia, government, and industry. The journal seeks original research submissions analyzing public policy, economics, social science, geography, and finance in the fields of mining, non-fuel minerals, energy minerals, fossil fuels, and metals. Mineral economics topics covered include mineral market analysis, price analysis, project evaluation, mining and sustainable development, mineral resource rents, resource curse, mineral wealth and corruption, mineral taxation and regulation, strategic minerals and their supply, and the impact of mineral development on local communities and indigenous populations. The journal specifically excludes papers with agriculture, forestry, or fisheries as their primary focus.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信