1级层压和装饰建筑材料的不燃性试验标准

IF 3.3 3区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
Tzu-Yan Tseng , Ming-Yuan Lei , Chen-Ming Hsiao , Kuang-Chung Tsai
{"title":"1级层压和装饰建筑材料的不燃性试验标准","authors":"Tzu-Yan Tseng ,&nbsp;Ming-Yuan Lei ,&nbsp;Chen-Ming Hsiao ,&nbsp;Kuang-Chung Tsai","doi":"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104519","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><div>In Taiwan, the non-combustibility test for building materials has been changed from CNS 6532 (based on JIS 1321) to CNS 15694 (based on ISO 1182), but the non-combustibility performance is still ranked using the “old” criteria of CNS 6532. There consequently exists a need to evaluate the feasibility of existing criteria. This study analyzed the differences of the two non-combustibility test methods, i.e. CNS 6532 and CNS 15694, and discussed the criteria applying ISO 1182 in other countries. A series of experiments is conducted to evaluate whether the current criteria can adequately rank the non-combustibility performance of building materials. Ten specimens selected from laminated and decorated building materials are tested for the comparative experiment since their “reaction to fire” performance may be complicated.</div><div>Our analysis demonstrates that the thermal environment in CNS 6532 and CNS15694 are different. CNS 15694 specifies that no automatic thermostatic can be used to control the furnace during testing but CNS 6532 does not. The temperatures for CNS 6532 tests return closer to the furnace setting temperature. Accordingly, the criteria for CNS 6532 cannot be used for CNS 15694. Additionally, the experimental results show that there is no significant difference in mass loss percentage. Further, for ensuring better confirmation of fire safety, a stricter assessment is recommended. Conclusively, this study recommends that the criteria for a non-combustibility test should comply with the Japanese standard, although the duration of flame is not included.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":50445,"journal":{"name":"Fire Safety Journal","volume":"157 ","pages":"Article 104519"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Criteria for non-combustibility tests for class 1 laminated and decorated building materials\",\"authors\":\"Tzu-Yan Tseng ,&nbsp;Ming-Yuan Lei ,&nbsp;Chen-Ming Hsiao ,&nbsp;Kuang-Chung Tsai\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.firesaf.2025.104519\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><div>In Taiwan, the non-combustibility test for building materials has been changed from CNS 6532 (based on JIS 1321) to CNS 15694 (based on ISO 1182), but the non-combustibility performance is still ranked using the “old” criteria of CNS 6532. There consequently exists a need to evaluate the feasibility of existing criteria. This study analyzed the differences of the two non-combustibility test methods, i.e. CNS 6532 and CNS 15694, and discussed the criteria applying ISO 1182 in other countries. A series of experiments is conducted to evaluate whether the current criteria can adequately rank the non-combustibility performance of building materials. Ten specimens selected from laminated and decorated building materials are tested for the comparative experiment since their “reaction to fire” performance may be complicated.</div><div>Our analysis demonstrates that the thermal environment in CNS 6532 and CNS15694 are different. CNS 15694 specifies that no automatic thermostatic can be used to control the furnace during testing but CNS 6532 does not. The temperatures for CNS 6532 tests return closer to the furnace setting temperature. Accordingly, the criteria for CNS 6532 cannot be used for CNS 15694. Additionally, the experimental results show that there is no significant difference in mass loss percentage. Further, for ensuring better confirmation of fire safety, a stricter assessment is recommended. Conclusively, this study recommends that the criteria for a non-combustibility test should comply with the Japanese standard, although the duration of flame is not included.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50445,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"volume\":\"157 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104519\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Fire Safety Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001833\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Fire Safety Journal","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0379711225001833","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在台湾,建筑材料的不燃性测试已由CNS 6532(基于JIS 1321)更改为CNS 15694(基于ISO 1182),但不燃性性能仍使用CNS 6532的“旧”标准进行排名。因此,有必要评价现有标准的可行性。本研究分析了CNS 6532和CNS 15694两种不燃性测试方法的差异,并讨论了其他国家采用ISO 1182的标准。通过一系列的实验来评价现行标准是否能够对建筑材料的不燃性进行充分的分级。由于叠层和装饰建筑材料的“火反应”性能可能比较复杂,因此选择10个试件进行对比试验。分析表明,CNS 6532和CNS15694的热环境是不同的。CNS 15694规定在测试过程中不能使用自动恒温器来控制炉子,但CNS 6532没有规定。CNS 6532测试的温度更接近炉膛设定温度。因此,CNS 6532的标准不能用于CNS 15694。此外,实验结果表明,质量损失率没有显著差异。此外,为了确保更好地确认消防安全,建议进行更严格的评估。最后,本研究建议不燃性测试的标准应符合日本标准,尽管不包括火焰持续时间。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Criteria for non-combustibility tests for class 1 laminated and decorated building materials
In Taiwan, the non-combustibility test for building materials has been changed from CNS 6532 (based on JIS 1321) to CNS 15694 (based on ISO 1182), but the non-combustibility performance is still ranked using the “old” criteria of CNS 6532. There consequently exists a need to evaluate the feasibility of existing criteria. This study analyzed the differences of the two non-combustibility test methods, i.e. CNS 6532 and CNS 15694, and discussed the criteria applying ISO 1182 in other countries. A series of experiments is conducted to evaluate whether the current criteria can adequately rank the non-combustibility performance of building materials. Ten specimens selected from laminated and decorated building materials are tested for the comparative experiment since their “reaction to fire” performance may be complicated.
Our analysis demonstrates that the thermal environment in CNS 6532 and CNS15694 are different. CNS 15694 specifies that no automatic thermostatic can be used to control the furnace during testing but CNS 6532 does not. The temperatures for CNS 6532 tests return closer to the furnace setting temperature. Accordingly, the criteria for CNS 6532 cannot be used for CNS 15694. Additionally, the experimental results show that there is no significant difference in mass loss percentage. Further, for ensuring better confirmation of fire safety, a stricter assessment is recommended. Conclusively, this study recommends that the criteria for a non-combustibility test should comply with the Japanese standard, although the duration of flame is not included.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Fire Safety Journal
Fire Safety Journal 工程技术-材料科学:综合
CiteScore
5.70
自引率
9.70%
发文量
153
审稿时长
60 days
期刊介绍: Fire Safety Journal is the leading publication dealing with all aspects of fire safety engineering. Its scope is purposefully wide, as it is deemed important to encourage papers from all sources within this multidisciplinary subject, thus providing a forum for its further development as a distinct engineering discipline. This is an essential step towards gaining a status equal to that enjoyed by the other engineering disciplines.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信