斯洛伐克疫苗接种态度检查(VAX)量表和试点研究的验证

IF 2.2 Q3 IMMUNOLOGY
Martin Novák , Jana Zibolenová , Peter Vyšehradský , Romana Ulbrichtová , Eva Malobická , Eliška Štefanová , Ján Mikas , Adriana Mečochová , Henrieta Hudečková , Viera Švihrová
{"title":"斯洛伐克疫苗接种态度检查(VAX)量表和试点研究的验证","authors":"Martin Novák ,&nbsp;Jana Zibolenová ,&nbsp;Peter Vyšehradský ,&nbsp;Romana Ulbrichtová ,&nbsp;Eva Malobická ,&nbsp;Eliška Štefanová ,&nbsp;Ján Mikas ,&nbsp;Adriana Mečochová ,&nbsp;Henrieta Hudečková ,&nbsp;Viera Švihrová","doi":"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100715","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases poses a significant global public health challenge, exacerbated by the rise of anti-vaccination attitudes. The aim of this study was to validate the Slovak version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) questionnaire and to examine the attitudes towards vaccination in Slovakia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The VAX scale questionnaire, translated into Slovak and validated, was used for the survey. The VAX scale uses 12 statements assessing anti-vaccination attitudes. Each statement is scored on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher total score indicates more negative attitudes towards vaccinations. Our questionnaire also included demographic questions (age, gender, residence, education level, profession, and economic activity). For validation, the questionnaire was translated into the Slovak using forward and backward translations. The validation survey was conducted on the sample size of 115 participants. Correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, internal consistency was tested. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess validity. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted in March 2023 with a sample size of 473 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The VAX scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.925) and reliability. The results of the CFA were comparable to findings from other languages versions. The pilot study revealed that parents, non-healthcare professionals, and older individuals exhibited higher anti-vaccination attitudes. In contrast, healthcare professionals had the lowest VAX scores, reflecting more pro-vaccination attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the need for targeted educational and communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy. By identifying demographic patterns and potential hotspots of vaccine skepticism, public health initiatives can be better tailored to improve vaccination rates. The validated Slovak VAX scale provides a reliable tool for ongoing assessment and intervention efforts.</div></div>","PeriodicalId":43021,"journal":{"name":"Vaccine: X","volume":"26 ","pages":"Article 100715"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The validation of the Slovak vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale and pilot study\",\"authors\":\"Martin Novák ,&nbsp;Jana Zibolenová ,&nbsp;Peter Vyšehradský ,&nbsp;Romana Ulbrichtová ,&nbsp;Eva Malobická ,&nbsp;Eliška Štefanová ,&nbsp;Ján Mikas ,&nbsp;Adriana Mečochová ,&nbsp;Henrieta Hudečková ,&nbsp;Viera Švihrová\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jvacx.2025.100715\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction</h3><div>The resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases poses a significant global public health challenge, exacerbated by the rise of anti-vaccination attitudes. The aim of this study was to validate the Slovak version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) questionnaire and to examine the attitudes towards vaccination in Slovakia.</div></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><div>The VAX scale questionnaire, translated into Slovak and validated, was used for the survey. The VAX scale uses 12 statements assessing anti-vaccination attitudes. Each statement is scored on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher total score indicates more negative attitudes towards vaccinations. Our questionnaire also included demographic questions (age, gender, residence, education level, profession, and economic activity). For validation, the questionnaire was translated into the Slovak using forward and backward translations. The validation survey was conducted on the sample size of 115 participants. Correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, internal consistency was tested. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess validity. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted in March 2023 with a sample size of 473 participants.</div></div><div><h3>Results</h3><div>The VAX scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.925) and reliability. The results of the CFA were comparable to findings from other languages versions. The pilot study revealed that parents, non-healthcare professionals, and older individuals exhibited higher anti-vaccination attitudes. In contrast, healthcare professionals had the lowest VAX scores, reflecting more pro-vaccination attitudes.</div></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><div>These findings highlight the need for targeted educational and communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy. By identifying demographic patterns and potential hotspots of vaccine skepticism, public health initiatives can be better tailored to improve vaccination rates. The validated Slovak VAX scale provides a reliable tool for ongoing assessment and intervention efforts.</div></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":43021,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"volume\":\"26 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100715\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Vaccine: X\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225001093\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"IMMUNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vaccine: X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2590136225001093","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"IMMUNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

疫苗可预防疾病的死灰复燃对全球公共卫生构成重大挑战,反疫苗接种态度的上升加剧了这一挑战。本研究的目的是验证斯洛伐克版本的疫苗接种态度检查(VAX)问卷,并检查斯洛伐克对疫苗接种的态度。方法采用VAX量表问卷,经斯洛伐克文翻译并验证。VAX量表使用12个陈述来评估反对接种疫苗的态度。每个陈述都以6分的李克特量表得分,总分越高表明对疫苗接种的负面态度越强烈。我们的问卷还包括人口统计问题(年龄、性别、居住地、教育水平、职业和经济活动)。为了验证,使用正向和反向翻译将问卷翻译成斯洛伐克文。验证性调查的样本量为115人。采用Pearson相关系数计算相关性,检验内部一致性。验证性因子分析(CFA)评估效度。随后,在2023年3月进行了一项试点研究,样本量为473名参与者。结果VAX量表具有较强的内部一致性(Cronbach’s alpha = 0.925)和信度。CFA的结果与其他语言版本的结果相当。初步研究显示,父母、非卫生保健专业人员和老年人表现出更高的反疫苗接种态度。相比之下,医疗保健专业人员的VAX得分最低,反映出更赞成接种疫苗的态度。结论这些发现突出了有针对性的教育和传播策略来解决疫苗犹豫的必要性。通过确定人口统计模式和疫苗怀疑的潜在热点,可以更好地调整公共卫生举措,以提高疫苗接种率。经过验证的斯洛伐克VAX量表为正在进行的评估和干预工作提供了可靠的工具。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The validation of the Slovak vaccination attitudes examination (VAX) scale and pilot study

Introduction

The resurgence of vaccine-preventable diseases poses a significant global public health challenge, exacerbated by the rise of anti-vaccination attitudes. The aim of this study was to validate the Slovak version of the Vaccination Attitudes Examination (VAX) questionnaire and to examine the attitudes towards vaccination in Slovakia.

Methods

The VAX scale questionnaire, translated into Slovak and validated, was used for the survey. The VAX scale uses 12 statements assessing anti-vaccination attitudes. Each statement is scored on a 6-point Likert scale, with higher total score indicates more negative attitudes towards vaccinations. Our questionnaire also included demographic questions (age, gender, residence, education level, profession, and economic activity). For validation, the questionnaire was translated into the Slovak using forward and backward translations. The validation survey was conducted on the sample size of 115 participants. Correlation was calculated using Pearson's correlation coefficient, internal consistency was tested. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was performed to assess validity. Subsequently, a pilot study was conducted in March 2023 with a sample size of 473 participants.

Results

The VAX scale demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.925) and reliability. The results of the CFA were comparable to findings from other languages versions. The pilot study revealed that parents, non-healthcare professionals, and older individuals exhibited higher anti-vaccination attitudes. In contrast, healthcare professionals had the lowest VAX scores, reflecting more pro-vaccination attitudes.

Conclusion

These findings highlight the need for targeted educational and communication strategies to address vaccine hesitancy. By identifying demographic patterns and potential hotspots of vaccine skepticism, public health initiatives can be better tailored to improve vaccination rates. The validated Slovak VAX scale provides a reliable tool for ongoing assessment and intervention efforts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Vaccine: X
Vaccine: X Multiple-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
2.60%
发文量
102
审稿时长
13 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信