{"title":"三维颅面形态学使用面部扫描仪预测牙周组织的尺寸","authors":"Kaijin Lin, Yongqing Guo, Minqian Zheng, Yue Tang, Jin Yang, Dong Wu, Jianbin Guo","doi":"10.1002/jper.70006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BackgroundDespite growing interest in dentofacial interactions, evidence linking three‐dimensional (3D) craniofacial morphology to periodontal phenotypes remains sparse. This cross‐sectional study aimed to investigate correlations between maxillary anterior periodontal parameters and 3D craniofacial morphology in a Chinese population.MethodsParticipants underwent cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans to quantify bone thickness (BT) (at 2 mm [BT<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>] and 4 mm [BT<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>] apical to the alveolar crest), gingival thickness (GT) (at cemento‐enamel junction [GT<jats:sub>cej</jats:sub>] and bone crest [GT<jats:sub>bc</jats:sub>]), and periodontal supra‐crestal tissue height (PSTH). A 3D facial scanner measured vertical dimensions (facial height [FH], morphological facial height [MFH], nasal height [NH], lip height [LH]), and proportional indices (facial index [FI], morphological facial index [MFI], nasal index [NI], and lip index [LI]). Pearson correlations were performed to determine relationships between periodontal and craniofacial variables with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsA total of 96 adults (576 maxillary anterior teeth) participated in this study. NI, FH, MFH, and NH correlated positively with BT<jats:sub>1</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05) and BT<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05). Craniofacial indices (FI, MFI, and NI) exhibited significant positive associations with GT<jats:sub>cej</jats:sub> and GT<jats:sub>bc</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05), except lip‐related parameters. FI and MFI showed significant correlations with PSTH (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05).ConclusionsBrachyfacial morphology and broader/shorter nasal dimensions were found associated with thinner gingiva, reduced alveolar bone, and lower PSTH in the maxillary anterior region. These findings highlight craniofacial morphology as a potential predictor of periodontal vulnerability.Plain Language SummaryPeople with shorter, broader facial structures tend to have thinner gum and bone tissues around teeth compared to those with longer, narrower faces, meaning their facial shape could help dentists predict and personalize treatments to avoid gum problems or implant issues.","PeriodicalId":16716,"journal":{"name":"Journal of periodontology","volume":"139 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.8000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Three‐dimensional craniofacial morphology predicts periodontal tissue dimensions using the facial scanner\",\"authors\":\"Kaijin Lin, Yongqing Guo, Minqian Zheng, Yue Tang, Jin Yang, Dong Wu, Jianbin Guo\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/jper.70006\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BackgroundDespite growing interest in dentofacial interactions, evidence linking three‐dimensional (3D) craniofacial morphology to periodontal phenotypes remains sparse. This cross‐sectional study aimed to investigate correlations between maxillary anterior periodontal parameters and 3D craniofacial morphology in a Chinese population.MethodsParticipants underwent cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans to quantify bone thickness (BT) (at 2 mm [BT<jats:sub>1</jats:sub>] and 4 mm [BT<jats:sub>2</jats:sub>] apical to the alveolar crest), gingival thickness (GT) (at cemento‐enamel junction [GT<jats:sub>cej</jats:sub>] and bone crest [GT<jats:sub>bc</jats:sub>]), and periodontal supra‐crestal tissue height (PSTH). A 3D facial scanner measured vertical dimensions (facial height [FH], morphological facial height [MFH], nasal height [NH], lip height [LH]), and proportional indices (facial index [FI], morphological facial index [MFI], nasal index [NI], and lip index [LI]). Pearson correlations were performed to determine relationships between periodontal and craniofacial variables with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (<jats:italic>α</jats:italic> = 0.05).ResultsA total of 96 adults (576 maxillary anterior teeth) participated in this study. NI, FH, MFH, and NH correlated positively with BT<jats:sub>1</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05) and BT<jats:sub>2</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05). Craniofacial indices (FI, MFI, and NI) exhibited significant positive associations with GT<jats:sub>cej</jats:sub> and GT<jats:sub>bc</jats:sub> (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05), except lip‐related parameters. FI and MFI showed significant correlations with PSTH (<jats:italic>r</jats:italic> > 0.3, <jats:italic>p </jats:italic>< 0.05).ConclusionsBrachyfacial morphology and broader/shorter nasal dimensions were found associated with thinner gingiva, reduced alveolar bone, and lower PSTH in the maxillary anterior region. These findings highlight craniofacial morphology as a potential predictor of periodontal vulnerability.Plain Language SummaryPeople with shorter, broader facial structures tend to have thinner gum and bone tissues around teeth compared to those with longer, narrower faces, meaning their facial shape could help dentists predict and personalize treatments to avoid gum problems or implant issues.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16716,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"volume\":\"139 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of periodontology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70006\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of periodontology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/jper.70006","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
尽管人们对牙面相互作用的兴趣越来越大,但将三维(3D)颅面形态与牙周表型联系起来的证据仍然很少。本横断面研究旨在探讨中国人群上颌前牙周参数与三维颅面形态之间的相关性。方法通过锥形束计算机断层扫描(CBCT)和口腔内扫描来量化骨厚度(2 mm [BT1]和4 mm [BT2]尖牙槽嵴),牙龈厚度(GT)(在牙骨质-牙釉质交界处[GTcej]和骨嵴[GTbc])和牙周嵴上组织高度(PSTH)。3D面部扫描仪测量了垂直尺寸(面部高度[FH]、形态面部高度[MFH]、鼻高[NH]、唇高[LH])和比例指数(面部指数[FI]、形态面部指数[MFI]、鼻指数[NI]和嘴唇指数[LI])。采用Pearson相关性来确定牙周和颅面变量之间的关系,并对多重比较进行Bonferroni校正(α = 0.05)。结果共96例成人上颌前牙576颗。NI、FH、MFH、NH与BT1 (r > 0.3, p < 0.05)、BT2 (r > 0.3, p < 0.05)呈正相关。颅面指数(FI、MFI和NI)与GTcej和GTbc呈显著正相关(r > 0.3, p < 0.05),但唇相关参数除外。FI、MFI与PSTH呈显著相关(r > 0.3, p < 0.05)。结论近面形态和鼻宽/鼻短与上颌前区牙龈变薄、牙槽骨减少、PSTH降低有关。这些发现强调颅面形态是牙周易损性的潜在预测因子。与长脸窄脸的人相比,短脸宽脸的人牙齿周围的牙龈和骨组织往往更薄,这意味着他们的脸型可以帮助牙医预测和个性化治疗,以避免牙龈问题或种植问题。
Three‐dimensional craniofacial morphology predicts periodontal tissue dimensions using the facial scanner
BackgroundDespite growing interest in dentofacial interactions, evidence linking three‐dimensional (3D) craniofacial morphology to periodontal phenotypes remains sparse. This cross‐sectional study aimed to investigate correlations between maxillary anterior periodontal parameters and 3D craniofacial morphology in a Chinese population.MethodsParticipants underwent cone‐beam computed tomography (CBCT) and intraoral scans to quantify bone thickness (BT) (at 2 mm [BT1] and 4 mm [BT2] apical to the alveolar crest), gingival thickness (GT) (at cemento‐enamel junction [GTcej] and bone crest [GTbc]), and periodontal supra‐crestal tissue height (PSTH). A 3D facial scanner measured vertical dimensions (facial height [FH], morphological facial height [MFH], nasal height [NH], lip height [LH]), and proportional indices (facial index [FI], morphological facial index [MFI], nasal index [NI], and lip index [LI]). Pearson correlations were performed to determine relationships between periodontal and craniofacial variables with Bonferroni correction for multiple comparisons (α = 0.05).ResultsA total of 96 adults (576 maxillary anterior teeth) participated in this study. NI, FH, MFH, and NH correlated positively with BT1 (r > 0.3, p < 0.05) and BT2 (r > 0.3, p < 0.05). Craniofacial indices (FI, MFI, and NI) exhibited significant positive associations with GTcej and GTbc (r > 0.3, p < 0.05), except lip‐related parameters. FI and MFI showed significant correlations with PSTH (r > 0.3, p < 0.05).ConclusionsBrachyfacial morphology and broader/shorter nasal dimensions were found associated with thinner gingiva, reduced alveolar bone, and lower PSTH in the maxillary anterior region. These findings highlight craniofacial morphology as a potential predictor of periodontal vulnerability.Plain Language SummaryPeople with shorter, broader facial structures tend to have thinner gum and bone tissues around teeth compared to those with longer, narrower faces, meaning their facial shape could help dentists predict and personalize treatments to avoid gum problems or implant issues.