Yilan Wu, Bo Qian, Tingyao Li, Yiming Qin, Zhouyu Guan, Tingli Chen, Yali Jia, Ping Zhang, Dian Zeng, Sayoko Moroi, Rajiv Raman, Benjamin Sommer Thinggaard, Frederik Pedersen, José Alogo Obiang Ñehe, Tengku Ain Kamalden, Yukun Zhou, Yixiao Jin, Huating Li, An Ran Ran, Dawei Yang, Ziyao Meng, Qingsheng Peng, Ying Feng Zheng, Dingqiao Wang, Hongwei Ji, Pengxiao Zang, Changchang Yin, Jie Shen, Youxin Chen, Weihong Yu, Rongping Dai, Chenxi Zhang, Xinyu Zhao, Xiangning Wang, Yan Chen, Qiang Wu, Hongbin Xie, Simon K. H. Szeto, Julia Y. Y. Chan, Victor T. T. Chan, Hua-Tao Xie, Ruili Wei, Jin Li, Weizhi Ma, Lei Zhu, Hongqiu Wang, Huazhu Fu, Wenxiao Wang, Shan Lin, Zejun Xu, Nian Guan, Xiao Zhang, Andrzej Grzybowski, Monika Gołębiowska-Bogaj, Maciej Gawęcki, Adrian Smedowski, Wojciech Szaraniec, You Wu, Yang Wen, Xiang Chen, Yuanqi Yao, Lee-Ling Lim, Carol Y. Cheung, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Jakob Grauslund, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Sobha Sivaprasad, Pearse A. Keane, Ya Xing Wang, Yih-Chung Tham, Ching-Yu Cheng, Tien Yin Wong, Bin Sheng
{"title":"眼保健基金会的临床援助模型:随机对照试验","authors":"Yilan Wu, Bo Qian, Tingyao Li, Yiming Qin, Zhouyu Guan, Tingli Chen, Yali Jia, Ping Zhang, Dian Zeng, Sayoko Moroi, Rajiv Raman, Benjamin Sommer Thinggaard, Frederik Pedersen, José Alogo Obiang Ñehe, Tengku Ain Kamalden, Yukun Zhou, Yixiao Jin, Huating Li, An Ran Ran, Dawei Yang, Ziyao Meng, Qingsheng Peng, Ying Feng Zheng, Dingqiao Wang, Hongwei Ji, Pengxiao Zang, Changchang Yin, Jie Shen, Youxin Chen, Weihong Yu, Rongping Dai, Chenxi Zhang, Xinyu Zhao, Xiangning Wang, Yan Chen, Qiang Wu, Hongbin Xie, Simon K. H. Szeto, Julia Y. Y. Chan, Victor T. T. Chan, Hua-Tao Xie, Ruili Wei, Jin Li, Weizhi Ma, Lei Zhu, Hongqiu Wang, Huazhu Fu, Wenxiao Wang, Shan Lin, Zejun Xu, Nian Guan, Xiao Zhang, Andrzej Grzybowski, Monika Gołębiowska-Bogaj, Maciej Gawęcki, Adrian Smedowski, Wojciech Szaraniec, You Wu, Yang Wen, Xiang Chen, Yuanqi Yao, Lee-Ling Lim, Carol Y. Cheung, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Jakob Grauslund, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Sobha Sivaprasad, Pearse A. Keane, Ya Xing Wang, Yih-Chung Tham, Ching-Yu Cheng, Tien Yin Wong, Bin Sheng","doi":"10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>In the context of an increasing need for clinical assessments of foundation models, we developed EyeFM, a multimodal vision–language eyecare copilot, and conducted a multifaceted evaluation, including retrospective validations, multicountry efficacy validation as a clinical copilot and a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT). EyeFM was pretrained on 14.5 million ocular images from five imaging modalities paired with clinical texts from global, multiethnic datasets. Efficacy validation invited 44 ophthalmologists across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa in primary and specialty care settings, highlighting its utility as a clinical copilot. The RCT—a parallel, single-center, double-masked study—assessed EyeFM as a clinical copilot in retinal disease screening among a high-risk population in China. A total of 668 participants (mean age 57.5 years, 79.5% male) were randomized to 16 ophthalmologists, equally allocated into intervention (with EyeFM copilot) and control (standard care) groups. The primary endpoint indicated that ophthalmologists with EyeFM copilot achieved higher correct diagnostic rate (92.2% versus 75.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and referral rate (92.2% versus 80.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Secondary outcome indicated improved standardization score of clinical reports (median 33 versus 37, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Participant satisfaction with the screening was similar between groups, whereas the intervention group demonstrated higher compliance with self-management (70.1% versus 49.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and referral suggestions (33.7% versus 20.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) at follow-up. Post-deployment evaluations indicated strong user acceptance. Our study provided evidence that implementing EyeFM copilot can improve the performance of ophthalmologists and the outcome of patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2500095518.</p>","PeriodicalId":19037,"journal":{"name":"Nature Medicine","volume":"23 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":50.0000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An eyecare foundation model for clinical assistance: a randomized controlled trial\",\"authors\":\"Yilan Wu, Bo Qian, Tingyao Li, Yiming Qin, Zhouyu Guan, Tingli Chen, Yali Jia, Ping Zhang, Dian Zeng, Sayoko Moroi, Rajiv Raman, Benjamin Sommer Thinggaard, Frederik Pedersen, José Alogo Obiang Ñehe, Tengku Ain Kamalden, Yukun Zhou, Yixiao Jin, Huating Li, An Ran Ran, Dawei Yang, Ziyao Meng, Qingsheng Peng, Ying Feng Zheng, Dingqiao Wang, Hongwei Ji, Pengxiao Zang, Changchang Yin, Jie Shen, Youxin Chen, Weihong Yu, Rongping Dai, Chenxi Zhang, Xinyu Zhao, Xiangning Wang, Yan Chen, Qiang Wu, Hongbin Xie, Simon K. H. Szeto, Julia Y. Y. Chan, Victor T. T. Chan, Hua-Tao Xie, Ruili Wei, Jin Li, Weizhi Ma, Lei Zhu, Hongqiu Wang, Huazhu Fu, Wenxiao Wang, Shan Lin, Zejun Xu, Nian Guan, Xiao Zhang, Andrzej Grzybowski, Monika Gołębiowska-Bogaj, Maciej Gawęcki, Adrian Smedowski, Wojciech Szaraniec, You Wu, Yang Wen, Xiang Chen, Yuanqi Yao, Lee-Ling Lim, Carol Y. Cheung, Gavin Siew Wei Tan, Jakob Grauslund, Paisan Ruamviboonsuk, Sobha Sivaprasad, Pearse A. Keane, Ya Xing Wang, Yih-Chung Tham, Ching-Yu Cheng, Tien Yin Wong, Bin Sheng\",\"doi\":\"10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>In the context of an increasing need for clinical assessments of foundation models, we developed EyeFM, a multimodal vision–language eyecare copilot, and conducted a multifaceted evaluation, including retrospective validations, multicountry efficacy validation as a clinical copilot and a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT). EyeFM was pretrained on 14.5 million ocular images from five imaging modalities paired with clinical texts from global, multiethnic datasets. Efficacy validation invited 44 ophthalmologists across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa in primary and specialty care settings, highlighting its utility as a clinical copilot. The RCT—a parallel, single-center, double-masked study—assessed EyeFM as a clinical copilot in retinal disease screening among a high-risk population in China. A total of 668 participants (mean age 57.5 years, 79.5% male) were randomized to 16 ophthalmologists, equally allocated into intervention (with EyeFM copilot) and control (standard care) groups. The primary endpoint indicated that ophthalmologists with EyeFM copilot achieved higher correct diagnostic rate (92.2% versus 75.4%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and referral rate (92.2% versus 80.5%, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Secondary outcome indicated improved standardization score of clinical reports (median 33 versus 37, <i>P</i> < 0.001). Participant satisfaction with the screening was similar between groups, whereas the intervention group demonstrated higher compliance with self-management (70.1% versus 49.1%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) and referral suggestions (33.7% versus 20.2%, <i>P</i> < 0.001) at follow-up. Post-deployment evaluations indicated strong user acceptance. Our study provided evidence that implementing EyeFM copilot can improve the performance of ophthalmologists and the outcome of patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2500095518.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":19037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":50.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nature Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nature Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1038/s41591-025-03900-7","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BIOCHEMISTRY & MOLECULAR BIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
An eyecare foundation model for clinical assistance: a randomized controlled trial
In the context of an increasing need for clinical assessments of foundation models, we developed EyeFM, a multimodal vision–language eyecare copilot, and conducted a multifaceted evaluation, including retrospective validations, multicountry efficacy validation as a clinical copilot and a double-masked randomized controlled trial (RCT). EyeFM was pretrained on 14.5 million ocular images from five imaging modalities paired with clinical texts from global, multiethnic datasets. Efficacy validation invited 44 ophthalmologists across North America, Europe, Asia and Africa in primary and specialty care settings, highlighting its utility as a clinical copilot. The RCT—a parallel, single-center, double-masked study—assessed EyeFM as a clinical copilot in retinal disease screening among a high-risk population in China. A total of 668 participants (mean age 57.5 years, 79.5% male) were randomized to 16 ophthalmologists, equally allocated into intervention (with EyeFM copilot) and control (standard care) groups. The primary endpoint indicated that ophthalmologists with EyeFM copilot achieved higher correct diagnostic rate (92.2% versus 75.4%, P < 0.001) and referral rate (92.2% versus 80.5%, P < 0.001). Secondary outcome indicated improved standardization score of clinical reports (median 33 versus 37, P < 0.001). Participant satisfaction with the screening was similar between groups, whereas the intervention group demonstrated higher compliance with self-management (70.1% versus 49.1%, P < 0.001) and referral suggestions (33.7% versus 20.2%, P < 0.001) at follow-up. Post-deployment evaluations indicated strong user acceptance. Our study provided evidence that implementing EyeFM copilot can improve the performance of ophthalmologists and the outcome of patients. Chinese Clinical Trial Registry registration: ChiCTR2500095518.
期刊介绍:
Nature Medicine is a monthly journal publishing original peer-reviewed research in all areas of medicine. The publication focuses on originality, timeliness, interdisciplinary interest, and the impact on improving human health. In addition to research articles, Nature Medicine also publishes commissioned content such as News, Reviews, and Perspectives. This content aims to provide context for the latest advances in translational and clinical research, reaching a wide audience of M.D. and Ph.D. readers. All editorial decisions for the journal are made by a team of full-time professional editors.
Nature Medicine consider all types of clinical research, including:
-Case-reports and small case series
-Clinical trials, whether phase 1, 2, 3 or 4
-Observational studies
-Meta-analyses
-Biomarker studies
-Public and global health studies
Nature Medicine is also committed to facilitating communication between translational and clinical researchers. As such, we consider “hybrid” studies with preclinical and translational findings reported alongside data from clinical studies.