Shirin Taravati, Sahar Tehrani, Masoumeh Khataminia, Vahid Rakhshan
{"title":"全麻单次治疗与多次治疗对恒磨牙龋状态的影响:非随机临床试验","authors":"Shirin Taravati, Sahar Tehrani, Masoumeh Khataminia, Vahid Rakhshan","doi":"10.1002/cre2.70187","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>Effects of treatment under general anesthesia versus several sessions of at-office treatment on the transition of caries prevalence from primary to permanent dentitions have not been assessed. Moreover, other gaps exist in the literature.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\n \n <p>This 4-group non-randomized clinical trial was performed on 280 children 8–10 years old in 4 groups, including both negative and positive controls: children with a history of caries in primary teeth who were (1) treated routinely in office (<i>n</i> = 60) versus (2) under general anesthesia versus (<i>n</i> = 110) (3) similar children undergoing no treatment versus (positive control, <i>n</i> = 60) (4) children without a history of primary teeth caries (negative caries, <i>n</i> = 50). A clinical assessment was performed to assess dmft (caries and restoration statuses of primary teeth), OHI-S (oral hygiene), and ICDAS indexes (caries and restoration statuses of permanent molars). Data were analyzed (α = 0.05).</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>There were significant, positive correlations among dmft, caries component of ICDAS, and OHI-S (<i>p</i>-values = 0.000). The dmft scores were significantly different across 4 groups (Kruskal–Wallis <i>p</i> = 0.000), with children treated under general anesthesia followed by in-office treatment and no-treatment positive control group having the highest dmft scores (all Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.013). The ICDAS-caries of the general anesthesia group was significantly greater than the negative control, but also significantly smaller than both positive control and in-office treatment group (all Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.009). Groups were different in terms of OHI-S (Kruskal–Wallis <i>p</i> = 0.000); hygiene was the worst in positive-control and in-office groups, followed by the anesthesia group and the negative control.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\n \n <p>Although children who underwent treatment with general anesthesia had the worst dmft scores, treatment under general anesthesia considerably reduced caries of their permanent first molars (as indicated by ICDAS scores) and oral hygiene (as indicated by OHI-S) compared to children who were treated routinely in the office. Primary tooth caries might be a decisive predictor of permanent molar caries formation.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":10203,"journal":{"name":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","volume":"11 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2025-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70187","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of Single-Session Treatment of Primary Teeth Under General Anesthesia Versus At-Office Multi-session Treatment on Permanent Molar Caries Status: Nonrandomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Shirin Taravati, Sahar Tehrani, Masoumeh Khataminia, Vahid Rakhshan\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cre2.70187\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>Effects of treatment under general anesthesia versus several sessions of at-office treatment on the transition of caries prevalence from primary to permanent dentitions have not been assessed. Moreover, other gaps exist in the literature.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Material and Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>This 4-group non-randomized clinical trial was performed on 280 children 8–10 years old in 4 groups, including both negative and positive controls: children with a history of caries in primary teeth who were (1) treated routinely in office (<i>n</i> = 60) versus (2) under general anesthesia versus (<i>n</i> = 110) (3) similar children undergoing no treatment versus (positive control, <i>n</i> = 60) (4) children without a history of primary teeth caries (negative caries, <i>n</i> = 50). A clinical assessment was performed to assess dmft (caries and restoration statuses of primary teeth), OHI-S (oral hygiene), and ICDAS indexes (caries and restoration statuses of permanent molars). Data were analyzed (α = 0.05).</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>There were significant, positive correlations among dmft, caries component of ICDAS, and OHI-S (<i>p</i>-values = 0.000). The dmft scores were significantly different across 4 groups (Kruskal–Wallis <i>p</i> = 0.000), with children treated under general anesthesia followed by in-office treatment and no-treatment positive control group having the highest dmft scores (all Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.013). The ICDAS-caries of the general anesthesia group was significantly greater than the negative control, but also significantly smaller than both positive control and in-office treatment group (all Bonferroni-adjusted <i>p</i>-values ≤ 0.009). Groups were different in terms of OHI-S (Kruskal–Wallis <i>p</i> = 0.000); hygiene was the worst in positive-control and in-office groups, followed by the anesthesia group and the negative control.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusions</h3>\\n \\n <p>Although children who underwent treatment with general anesthesia had the worst dmft scores, treatment under general anesthesia considerably reduced caries of their permanent first molars (as indicated by ICDAS scores) and oral hygiene (as indicated by OHI-S) compared to children who were treated routinely in the office. Primary tooth caries might be a decisive predictor of permanent molar caries formation.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":10203,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2025-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1002/cre2.70187\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70187\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical and Experimental Dental Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cre2.70187","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
目的:全麻治疗与几次门诊治疗对龋病从原牙向恒牙转变的影响尚未评估。此外,文献中还存在其他空白。材料与方法将280名8 ~ 10岁儿童分为4组进行非随机临床试验,包括阴性对照和阳性对照:有乳牙龋齿病史的儿童(1)在诊所常规治疗(n = 60)与(2)全身麻醉与(n = 110)(3)相似的儿童未接受治疗与(阳性对照,n = 60)(4)无乳牙龋齿史的儿童(阴性龋齿,n = 50)。进行临床评估,评估dmft(乳牙龋齿和修复状态)、ohi(口腔卫生)和ICDAS指数(恒磨牙龋齿和修复状态)。对数据进行分析(α = 0.05)。结果dmft、ICDAS龋齿成分与OHI-S呈显著正相关(p值= 0.000)。4组间dmft评分差异有统计学意义(Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.000),其中全麻醉后再进行办公室治疗组和未进行治疗的阳性对照组dmft评分最高(经bonferroni校正p值均≤0.013)。全麻组icdas龋率显著大于阴性对照组,但也显著小于阳性对照组和住院治疗组(经bonferroni校正p值均≤0.009)。各组在OHI-S方面存在差异(Kruskal-Wallis p = 0.000);阳性对照组和办公室组的卫生状况最差,其次是麻醉组和阴性对照组。结论:虽然接受全麻治疗的儿童dmft评分最差,但与在办公室常规治疗的儿童相比,全麻治疗显著减少了第一恒磨牙的龋齿(根据ICDAS评分)和口腔卫生(根据OHI-S)。乳牙龋齿可能是恒磨牙龋齿形成的决定性预测因素。
Effects of Single-Session Treatment of Primary Teeth Under General Anesthesia Versus At-Office Multi-session Treatment on Permanent Molar Caries Status: Nonrandomized Clinical Trial
Objectives
Effects of treatment under general anesthesia versus several sessions of at-office treatment on the transition of caries prevalence from primary to permanent dentitions have not been assessed. Moreover, other gaps exist in the literature.
Material and Methods
This 4-group non-randomized clinical trial was performed on 280 children 8–10 years old in 4 groups, including both negative and positive controls: children with a history of caries in primary teeth who were (1) treated routinely in office (n = 60) versus (2) under general anesthesia versus (n = 110) (3) similar children undergoing no treatment versus (positive control, n = 60) (4) children without a history of primary teeth caries (negative caries, n = 50). A clinical assessment was performed to assess dmft (caries and restoration statuses of primary teeth), OHI-S (oral hygiene), and ICDAS indexes (caries and restoration statuses of permanent molars). Data were analyzed (α = 0.05).
Results
There were significant, positive correlations among dmft, caries component of ICDAS, and OHI-S (p-values = 0.000). The dmft scores were significantly different across 4 groups (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.000), with children treated under general anesthesia followed by in-office treatment and no-treatment positive control group having the highest dmft scores (all Bonferroni-adjusted p-values ≤ 0.013). The ICDAS-caries of the general anesthesia group was significantly greater than the negative control, but also significantly smaller than both positive control and in-office treatment group (all Bonferroni-adjusted p-values ≤ 0.009). Groups were different in terms of OHI-S (Kruskal–Wallis p = 0.000); hygiene was the worst in positive-control and in-office groups, followed by the anesthesia group and the negative control.
Conclusions
Although children who underwent treatment with general anesthesia had the worst dmft scores, treatment under general anesthesia considerably reduced caries of their permanent first molars (as indicated by ICDAS scores) and oral hygiene (as indicated by OHI-S) compared to children who were treated routinely in the office. Primary tooth caries might be a decisive predictor of permanent molar caries formation.
期刊介绍:
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research aims to provide open access peer-reviewed publications of high scientific quality representing original clinical, diagnostic or experimental work within all disciplines and fields of oral medicine and dentistry. The scope of Clinical and Experimental Dental Research comprises original research material on the anatomy, physiology and pathology of oro-facial, oro-pharyngeal and maxillofacial tissues, and functions and dysfunctions within the stomatognathic system, and the epidemiology, aetiology, prevention, diagnosis, prognosis and therapy of diseases and conditions that have an effect on the homeostasis of the mouth, jaws, and closely associated structures, as well as the healing and regeneration and the clinical aspects of replacement of hard and soft tissues with biomaterials, and the rehabilitation of stomatognathic functions. Studies that bring new knowledge on how to advance health on the individual or public health levels, including interactions between oral and general health and ill-health are welcome.